Education for liberation, according to freire 1970,
Introduction
Education for liberation, according to freire
1970, described education as a process of liberation, which set man free all
kind of inhibitions and limitations, and makes him free to act humanly in the
world. Also
According to Nyerere 1982 say education
has to liberate a man by making him more of a human being because, becoming
aware of his potential as a human being he is in a positive life enhancing
relationship with himself with his neighbors and with his environment. For this
manner Nyerere viewed the purpose of education as liberation and development.
According to him development is of man for man, which should similarly be the
purpose of education.
Nyerere understood education as a tool for liberation
both an individual and the society. A tool which should liberate and individual
socially economically, psychologically cultural, physically, intellectually and
spiritually further education should add valid to learner through effective
transformation that lead to the growth of society and development of a nation.
The main purpose of this work was to examine the concept of education as a tool
for liberation in Nyerere understanding. The work present a theoretical frame
work.
Psycho-physical elements education out to
set both the mind and body of man free from psychological and physical
constraints. It should liberate him/her from the chain of ignorance and enable
him/her to take control over him or her-self and enjoy his or her own
environment. Nyerere argues that when a man succeed to unite his or her wrists
and to liberate his own arms, he can therefore liberate his feet from shackles
by using his hand he further emphasize
that a man can be free from restraints physically and still remain in captive.
If at all his/her mind is limited by altitude and habits that restrict his or
her humanity (Hinzen and hunds dorfer, 1982)
Socio-political aspect education the
learners are expected to acquire the kind of education which will liberate them
from the social and political constraints. The arguments given by Nyerere above
deduces that an educated individual is one who can freely socialize with other
and participate in state affairs consciously, nyerere’s social political
liberation is backed by many other philosopher especially existentialist like
martin Buber with his I-thou: Buber(1984) show how an individual needs other
from his/her existence as he say”
Mental and moral aspects education should
liberate an individual both mentally and morally: mental liberation will enable
an individual to be creative and competent in making use of his her own natural
resources for the development of himself or herself and the society in general
(Gerard, 1993), for Nyerere a man will work with other to use whatever
resources are at hand which may be his or her own knowledge, the knowledge of
other, the land the walir or simply his or her own sweat.
Features of a liberated person Nyerere
tried to show the difference between a liberated and unliberated person by
using two different Swahili words “msomi” ( a person whom education has not
transformed) and asiyeclimika “(a person whom the education has transformed).
According Nyerere, the former is a person who has lead through books and is “a
learner friend” as lawyer say but the lather is a person who has fully intergraded
and applies in life what he or she has studied. The implies the liberated
person is able appropriately use the knowledge acquired to his or her own
situation.
A part of Nyerere views about education for
liberation to Tanzania countries also Paul freire came’s with his views to
cement or to contribute about education for liberation how is potential in
society as follows,
Literacy and conscuntization.
Freire’s literacy method is founder on the
nation of conscuntization and dialogue. It involve teaching adults how to read
and write in relation to the awakening of their consciousness about their
social reality “consciousness is a process of developing consciousness, but
consciousness that is understood to have the power to transform reality” and
sander (1968)
Education
and social change.
Freire’s
literacy method whose key concepts are consciontization and dialogue has
contributed to our understanding of the processes of education and social
change centers on his contention that education cannot be neutral. It can
either be demonstrating or liberating his analysis include a critism of the
banking education (1970)
Freire’s
critism of banking education.
In
his work pedagogy of the oppressed (1970), freire criticisize the banking
conception of education which the labels bourgoes. In this conception of
education, the education thinks and learners are don’t know. The education
speaks and the leaner’s listen quality.
Conclusion:
All in all we can say that Nyerere and freire
views in educational for liberation argue that it is very potential to the
society has Tanzania education hence
Tanzania education is for liberation because it have potential to the
Individual and whole society as Nyerere and freire says.
Freire
.p. pedagogy of the oppressed. New York; the Seabury press 1970
Sander.T.li.
the Paulo freire method; literacy training and conscientization; west coast
south America series Chile. Vol.xv .No. 1.pp.1-17, 1968.
Hinzen.H.
and Hundsdorfer,.V. [1982]
education for liberation and
development ; The Tanzania experience; Retrieved from
http;/Unesdoc. unesco Orglimage/0003/000372/03727800 pdf
Gerard.
[1993]. Ethics, education and development. An Introduction text for students in
African colleges and universities. Dar .es .salaam. East Africa Publisher
Bulber.
M. [1984] I and Thou. Translated by
Ronald Gregor smith. Edinburgh; T&T
clark. Ltd
Comments
Post a Comment