Frederick Taylor's Scientific Management
Small
business owners and managers can benefit from learning about the theorists
whose work has given rise to many of the leadership approaches as well as the
best (and worst) practices used to guide and grow organizations of all sizes.
By
putting these approaches within a larger historical context, business leaders
can determine which theories best fit their organization and select components
from each philosophy to create a toolkit of effective management strategies
that work for them and their staff.
Here's
a quick overview of five theorists you should know about and their
groundbreaking work.
Frederick Taylor's Scientific Management
Frederick
W. Taylor (1856-1915) was among the first to study worker productivity and how
best to optimize it. Taylor, who had a background in mechanical engineering,
conducted controlled experiments that led him to develop four principles of
scientific management known as "Taylorism." These principles
recommend that the scientific method be used to determine the most efficient
way to perform a task in the workplace instead of simply relying on the
judgment or personal discretion of workers.
Taylor
promoted standardization and specialization by suggesting that workplace tasks
be broken down into a sequence of smaller steps. He concluded that managers
should assign workers to a job that best matched their ability, train them
thoroughly and supervise them to ensure that they worked efficiently.
However,
Taylor's focus on achieving workplace efficiency ignored the humanity of the
individual in favor of finding the optimal way to complete any given task.
Taylor's theory in its purest form isn't practiced much today; however, it did
shine a light on workplace efficiency, the value of training procedures, and
the need for cooperation between workers and managers.
Henri Fayol's Principles of Administrative
Management
Henri
Fayol (1841-1925), a mining engineer and senior executive in France, is
considered to be one of the most influential contributors to modern management
theory. Unlike Taylor, who improved productivity by analyzing workers' actions,
Fayol took a top-down approach.
Fayol
examined an organization through the lens of the managers and the situations
they might encounter. He believed that management has six paramount functions:
to forecast, plan, organize, command, coordinate and control. Fayol developed
14 principles of administration that outline how managers should organize and
interact with employees.
His
comprehensive principles, which have become foundational guidelines in many of
today's workplaces, cover topics ranging from the importance of maintaining an
orderly and clean facility to the value of promoting employee initiative and
teamwork.
Max Weber's Bureaucratic Management
Max
Weber (1864-1920) was a German sociologist who developed the bureaucratic
management theory, which focuses on structuring organizations in a hierarchical
fashion with clear rules of governance.
Weber's
principles for creating an ideal bureaucratic system include a clear division
of labor, a hierarchical chain of command, separation between the personal and
organizational assets of the owner, meticulous record keeping and
documentation, strict and consistent regulations and rules, and the selection
and promotion of employees based on qualifications and not personal
relationships or personalities.
Although
Weber recognized that bureaucracy was a threat to individual freedoms, he still
saw it as the most efficient and rational way of establishing organizations.
Today, the bureaucracy management approach is often perceived as impersonal and
overwhelmed by red tape, but it played a key role in universalizing the
establishment of standards and procedures, which are at the core of most modern
organizations.
Elton Mayo's Human Relations theory
Elton
Mayo (1880-1949) was an Australian born psychologist and Harvard researcher who
helped lay the foundation for the human relations movement. Mayo conducted
experiments aimed at improving productivity among dissatisfied employees at the
Hawthorne plant in Chicago in the 1920s.
He
changed working conditions, including lighting, temperature, break times, and
the length of the workday but observed that regardless of the change, there was
always an increase in productivity. This led Mayo and his team to conclude that
increases in workers' performance weren't due to changes in their environment
but a result of the researchers paying attention to them and of feeling valued
as part of a unified group collaborating in the study.
Mayo's
work led to the recognition of the importance of psychological and social
factors in creating productive organizations. This gave rise to the Human
Relations Theory, which concluded that employees are more motivated by factors,
such as being part of a group and personal attention, than money or even
working conditions. This people-oriented management approach requires managers
to acknowledge the complexity of human nature and the value of social ties in
the workplace.
Although
the validity of the Hawthorne experiments has been questioned in recent years,
Mayo's contributions to management theory are the underpinning of today's focus
on group dynamics and the use of team-building efforts to strengthen work
cultures.
Douglas McGregor's Theories X and Y
Douglas
McGregor (1906-1964) was an American social psychologist who introduced his X
and Y theories in his 1960 book "The Human Side of Enterprise." He
concluded that there are two fundamentally different styles of management that
are guided by managers' perceptions of their team members' motivations. Theory
X is authoritarian in nature and is used by managers who assume that employees
are apathetic or dislike their work. Theory Y is a participative management
style used by managers who believe that workers are self-motivated, responsible
and committed to taking ownership of their work.
While
Theory X leads to micromanaging, Theory Y gives rise to a more collaborative
and decentralized workplace. Theory Y, favored by McGregor, tends to be adopted
by smaller businesses and startups where employees at all levels are part of
the decision-making process and where creativity is encouraged. Large
organizations or those with many staff members may rely more on Theory X in
order to keep everyone focused on meeting organizational goals.
Comments
Post a Comment