Language change
Introduction
Language
change is one of the
of historical lingustic the
subfield of linguistic that
studies language aspect .Sometimes the term
diachronic is used instead
in the historicl lingistic as very
of referencing to the study of language
at various point in
time as stage ( adrn 2012)
Language
change is the phenomena
by which alteration are made
in the factoes and use
of a language over time .
all natural language
change and language change
affect all ares of langaugae
use .The chanhe sound
change , lexical .semantic .change
and syntiiic changes
Languahe
has developed over a given
we require o theretical
framework means a
model within which
may be started and explained. Ideally such a model
should be capable
of according for all changes
which have taken plpace
in the language by reducing
them a to systematically intergrated
set of rule bynon
1997
Family
tree morden language can be
historicall stemmed from
the internal diversification of
what was onces a single
language with no
neeed to resort
primaly to extrnal factors
as const or
language admixture . the
internal divesity among
morden remorn language forexample
can largel be explain by a process of intternal fragmentation
taking a relatively homogeneous
varity of spoken latin
as strating point . this
procedure know as
the comperative method
was intialy developed
ny the german neo grammirias in the
second half of
nineteeth century and
constrituted to this day
most seccessful approach
in reconstracting the
history language families
The
tree model puresupposses a flawed understanding of languguage
diversification in a nutshell
cladistic tree based represenation
are enntirely based oon the
the fiction tha
main reasonn why language
emerge is the abrupt
division of language
community into separete
social from the
fregmenation of a language into nertwork
of dialets which
remained in result
contact with each other
for an extendend
period of time
There
is one futher aspect
of the neogrammirian model whivh
require discussion namely
the proces whrere by
a single intial system
into a number of independence system
we must in others
words account for th
among into existenxe
of new language
The neogramria
model has said that
language are related
when they have
developed from a common
ancestor and the rulwe where by are
derived from the
ptoto language reseprent
the changes that each
has undergo during the
interrving period now
let us consider the use
Those will
bt definition share the
early rule and differ
only in thise rule two have been
added more recenty .the most
extreme sition would
be the one in which
all the rule were
identical except for a single
upper most rule
posssessed by only one the language
bynon 1977
The
reduction in the number
of language as one moves
backward in time thus
from the principle of share innovation
as indicator of common development
and it is the family try
showing the language which
are orginatyed from same
source
According
to asugustine schleicher
b1872 the reconstruction of proto
indo european culminate
wiyh his publishing
a fable com[posed
in the recondtructed language
his attempt was met with
ridicule , but why we may
ask is not reasonable
to expect of the grammar
of a language
that we should be able
to construst by
means of it grammatical sentences in short
there are clearly many
aspect of the reconstructyion whioch
are extremely tenous it is easy
to condemn schleicher attempt
as imprude and
for failing to distinguish beteewn
languae poarole,But even if we
agrre that reconstruction must
confine its to langue ,what kind of rule
doies this choice
imply provide however by
schleicher would appaer
to be usefull
and perfectly legimite excrise
about excrise about
the language change
The family tree m,odel is closel
linked to the comparative
method ws develpoewd
the neogrammaries in
1860-1880 .the comparitive method
allow us to establishe
relatedness between language
language the evolved
from a cvommon proto
language.these language are
the peresent in famality
descedende from there by
spliting in branches ,this model has served as the
foundation not only langugae
classification c but of language
change in general
The
wave modwl theory
A theoretical
model which postulates
the spread of lingustic innovation from a
center over the sorrounding
terrory much as
a stone trown
into stll water
produce progressivelly wider
and fainter around it point
of impact first proposed by johannes schmidit
in a book on the
internalationship of the
indio european and
has come to be as the wave theory .it
as designed to account for that when
related languiage arte compared a
certain correlation is generally
to be between geographical distance
and lingustic distance situation
must be envisage (
A number of different possible situtuion must be
invisaged
The ideal
case in one which
in undisturbed linguistic
territory that is to
asy on e in which
thre have been no
massive inluxe of immigrants nor
assssimilation of pre
exstinging communalities thre
arise a new politics
and culture center.
The two language which result
will clearly be
more closely related to each other
than either of the
will be to any third
language
The wave model
seeks however to account
not only for such
case of divergent
development but also
diffisution some features
across a number of language ,these are two
related but linguistically district dialect which
are geographical adjent
and whose territories have
become united under
the influence of some political
force with a single
admininitive and culture
center . the common innovation
may also arise
which will serve
to split both prevision
Comments
Post a Comment