The resolutions of the Berlin conference
INTRODUCTION.
According to Mgina (2014) define partition as to
break something into pieces, also refers to the process whereby African
continent was divided into pieces among imperialist countries in the last
quarter of 19th Century.
Partition of Africa refers to the division of Africa
continent by the European power, which resulted from the scramble /Straggling
of European countries against African continent.(Courtney faal, 2009)
The Partition of Africa began in earnest with the
Berlin conference of 1884-1885, and was the cause of most of African border of
today.
This conference was called by German chancellor Otto
Von Bismarck to settle how European countries would claim colonial land in
Africa and to avoid a war among European nations over Africa territory.
In the conference European countries such as German,
France, Great Britain, Belgium, Portugal,
Netherlands and Spain were invited to the conference. Also USA was invited because of its Interest
in Liberia but did not attend because it had no desire to colonize Africa.
The nations such as Austria-Hungary, Sweden, Norway,
Denmark, Italy, Turkey and Russia were invited because they were considered
minor players in the quest for colonizing Africa .
The task of this conference was to ensure that each
European country that claimed possession over a part of Africa must bring
civilisation in the form of Christianity and trade to each region that would
occupy.
The
resolutions of the Berlin conference were the following;
.The Congo free state was confirmed as the private
ownership of Congo society. Thus, the territory of the Democratic Republic of
Congo today, nearby two million square
kilometres, passed into the hands of the terrors regime established later
because a Belgian colony.
.The 14 Signitory powers have free trade across the
Congo river and lake Malawi and east of this an area south of 5 N.
.Niger and Congo river were free transit of ships
.The states signed an international ban against the
slave trade.
.Any new act of swearing or establishing
protectorate of any portion of the African coast should be notified to the
others signatories of the treaty.
BACK
GROUND OF THE PARTITION OF AFRICA.
The partition of Africa was motivated due to the
scramble of the Imperialist nations against African continent. The scramble for
Africa was the struggle among the European nations to divide African continent
among themselves .Also was the invansion accupation, colonisation and
annexation of African territory by European power during the period of imperialism
between 18881-1914.
Before the scramble and partition of Africa
happened, most European countries had trading contact with African societies
mainly at coast areas and few hinterlands. The country such as French in west
Africa had managed in controlling trade in Senegal colony at Lagos and Sierra
leone for commerce, most of Africans
continent at that time was still under local rulers by 1870s.
The scramble and partition of Africa it was started
at the second half of 19th century were African countries divided into pieces
by the European nations with the aims of exploitation also influenced much with
the industrial revolution when European nations competing in demanding areas
for getting raw materials, market for their industrial manufactured goods, cheap
labour and areas for investments, so they seen the alternative solution is to
go to Africa and find the strategic areas inorder to feed their mother
industries in Europe.
AREAS
IN AFRICA THAT EXPERIENCED INTENSIVE SCRAMLE.
European power scrambled for strategic areas such as
the Nile, Niger and Congo basins as well as Egypt, East Africa and South
Africa. The reasons behind the intensive scramble for these areas were due to
economic potential such as fertile agricultural land, Minerals, Rivers and
Animal products such as ivory and skins, they possessed in comparison with
other areas in Africa by the 19th century. Therefore all major European powers
were interested in them and wished to take control of these areas. Those areas
are following;
Niger
crisis
This crisis involved two major imperialist powers,
namely the British and Franch. Each nation contolled part of the Niger river
and wanted to control trade activities that prevailed on the delta of the river
and its banks. The rivalry between the two imperialist nations created
suspicion that if one of the two nations would control the potential areas in
the interior, and control the trading activities, it would limit the other
access of controlling these potential economic areas. Thus, the two powers found
themselves in the crisis of the scrambling for the Niger river and its delta.
Egypt
and Nile crisis.
This crisis was associated with the controlling of
the Suez canal in Egypt between the French and the British. French was the first European country to have
contact and relations with Egypt since 1798, during the rule of Napoleon
Bonaparte. Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Egypt claiming that he was saving her
from the mumluk Beys from Turkey.
However, French wanted to take control of Egypt's
wealth and defeated the British influence in Egypt. French intention of
controlling Egypt stimulated the British desire to control the Suez canal. The
Suez canal in Egypt was a strategic area to the British, because it was the shortest route to India
and the far East, which were potential
British investment area. The British and the French used the sultan of Turkey
to overthrow khedive Ismail, the Egyptian ruler in 1879, so as to have full
control of Egypt. However the task of taking control of Egypt was achieved by
the British alone, France had political problems at home and had a task of
supresing rebellions in Tunisia at the same time.
By1882, the British managed to take full control of
Egypt. This situation angered the French. They moved south of Egypt in order to
change the course of the Nile river and turn Egypt into a desert, Since Egypt
depended on the Nile river for its survival.
Congo
Crisis.
The Congo area was earlier claimed to be under the
British and the Portuguese influence. However, the French after losing Egypt to
the British in 1882 diverted their attention and interest to West Africa and
Congo. The French occupied portonovo followed by other European powers like
Germany, that claimed Togo, Cameroon, Tanganyika and South-West Africa
(Namibia) to be their areas of influence.
King Leonard II was the ruler of Belgium from 1865
to 1909. He wished to establish a personal empire. This was seeing powerful
European nations like and prestige from the colonies they had occupied. In 1876
king leopard II formed the international Africa Association(IAA). It was
claimed that the major purpose of this association was to abolish slave trade
and introduce free trade and Open up research centre in Africa.
Furthermore, king leopard II send several
expeditions into the interior of Africa. Among them was Henry Morton
Stanley, who in 1879 managed to explore
river Congo. Stanley reported that river Congo had potentials for commerce in
central. Moreover, Stanley falls later on,
created an empire of Congo in 1884. Thus, king Leopard II was able to
acquire rubber from Congo.
East
Africa Crisis.
The scramble and partition of East Africa was
motivated by commercial competition among Europeans, missionary activities in
Buganda and the role of Carl Peters. There was a commercial competition between
the British and the German consul to win the Sultan of Zanzibar so as to
develop trade and communication with the mainland so as to prevent Uganda and
Kenya from being under the control of other European powers, and also wanted to safeguard her Indian
colony which was a source of her industrial raw materials. On the Other hand, Germany was interested in making the
mainland her colony so as to protect the French missionaries in Uganda. King
Leopard II wanted to develop trade routes from the East Coast to the interior
up to Congo. The French and the British wanted to offer protection and support
to their missionaries in Buganda who were threatened by Kabaka Mutesa and the
Muslim. On the other hand, Carl
Peters, a German colonial agent, managed to sign bogus treaties with some
present day Tanzania mainland Chief on behalf of Germany without consulting the
Sultan of Zanzibar. A good example of
such bogus treaties was the agreement made between Carl Peters and Sultan
Mangungo of Msowero near Kilosa which was written in German language.
South
Africa Crisis.
South Africa experienced a scramble for the Dutch
and British. Though the Dutch were the first to settle at the Cape from 1652
and later moved to the interior and settled in Orange free state and Fransual,
the British come later and colonised the Cape and Natural provinces.
The British and the Boers competed for Diamond in
Kimberley and Gold in Witwatersrand. The competition led into the Anglo-Boer
war of 1880-188, and both parties war came to an end.
A map below show the territories which were
experienced intensive scramble.
FACTORS
FOR THE PARTITION OF AFRICA.
According to Larry king and others introduced the
following factors influenced the partition of African continent;
i) The creation
of boundaries. Africa was divided without consideration of local populations or
pre-existing cultural groups. The result was that most African borders were the
products of European geopolitical rivalries rather than West African histry.
This explains why most West African borders were created in European
chancelleries and followed astronomical, mathematical or geographical lines.
It was not the first time that the Europeans created
boundaries outside of Europe. In Latin America or South-East Asia, the
Europeans had already created boundaries between their colonies. When African
boundaries were negotiated in Europe, they were considered as part of a
large-scale bargain for territories. The British and the French, for example,
traded territories in West Africa (Los Islands in Guinea and upper Gambia),
South-East Asia (rights to colonise territories surrounding Thailand), the
Pacific (Vanuatu), and fishing rights in the Atlantic to seal their alliance
called the Entente Cordiale in 1904
Most boundaries were created to satisfy the
geopolitical ambitions of European diplomats who wanted to protect or affirm
their respective spheres of influence. Rivers were considered especially worthy
economic resources during this period, which explains how the borders of a
colony such as Gambia were carved along the Gambia River.
The Portuguese who had been present on the coasts of
Africa since the fifteenth century played a particular role in the creation of
borders. They collected and published numerous documents on the history of
their possessions in order to justify their presence in Africa. Historical
precedents were particularly sought after in a period where written documents
were used as legal evidence.
The border treaties signed between Europeans were
often very vague and needed to be adapted on the ground. The lack of
geographical knowledge of Africa on the part of the Europeans meant that
precise borders needed to be delimitated with the help of African populations.
So, at the scale of West Africa, most borders were traced in Europe but, at a
local level, African populations could influence the creation of the colonial
borders. This can be seen in the case of the Bundu kingdom which was used to
separate the two colonies of Senegal and French Sudan (Mali). The northern
boundary of the Sokoto Caliphate and Borno were also used by the British and
the French in their negotiations to separate Nigeria and Niger
After the defeat of Germany during the First World
War, its West African colonies of Togo and Cameroun were divided between the
British and the French under the aegis of the League of Nations. It was an
opportunity for the Ewe populations of Togoland to be reunited with other Ewe
speakers in the British colony of Gold Coast. The First World War was thus the
last opportunity to redraw borders in West Africa.
ii )
Influence of Berlin conference.
This was the second stage in the colonisation of Africa, the stage begun
from 1880s to 1890s, it was
characterised with the intervention of late comers in the process of scramble
and partition of Africa. Forexample Italy and Germs after their unification
they become powerful and industrialised search for raw materials in Africa.
iii) Franco
Prussian war. This was the war between Germany and France which led the taken
of the France provinces Alsace and Lorraine by the German. So through that
situation led France decided to compensate their loosen provinces which were
rich in iron and coal, and this
situation unhence them to come to Africa to find good place of getting raw
materials for their industries, so through that situation it led them scramble
and partition of Africa.
iv) The issue of over population in certain parts of
Europe contributed to the partition of Africa,
European wanted place to settle surplus citizens, the evident when the
British occupied South Africa and some parts of Kenya where the climate and
weather ware favourable for European settlement in those areas compared to gold
coast where the economy was less conductive.
v) Innovation of New weapons which enabled the
Europeans to conquer vast swathes of lands in a very short period of time
whilst African societies did not have the tools to fight efficiently. The
British army’s Martini-Henry breech-loading rifle could hit a target nearly a
mile away, and could be fired 12 times a minute. The Maxim gun could fire 600
rounds a minute. In comparison, many Africans were fighting with single-shot
muskets. Superior weaponry did not mean that many Africans were not able to
defend themselves in a series of localised conflicts. Indeed many resisted
European troops. For example, in modern-day Guinea, Sierra Leone, Mali and
Ivory Coast, Samori Ture fought against the French until his capture in 1898.
The Asante in modern-day Ghana also chose to fight against the British to
defend the Golden Stool. The Bijagó of Guinea-Bissau resisted formal
colonisation and hut taxes until th
Other tools also facilitated the European invasion
at the end of the nineteenth century. The steamboat and the telegraph
accelerated the pace of the colonial conquest as faster travel and
communication meant that European armies could easily distribute troops in
different corners of Africa for short periods. Tropical diseases were brought
under control by scientific discoveries. Before 1860, Europeans in West Africa
were 75% likely to die within 2 years, but the tre
vi) Social crime. Due to the over population in
Europe, a lot of people become
unemployed due to the uses of machines which replace human labours. During the
period many people become jobless, they
engaged in social crime like riots, theft, prostution, rural and urban
migration, bendity and raping. This situation led European countries to look
for the solution elsewhere to settle the paupers and unemployed population.
Forexample, Canada, Australia,
Newzealand, were already exhausted and Africa were seen as the only alternative
to be used, so this situation led the
sparked off the scramble for and partition of Africa.
vii) Economic slump/depression of 1873-1895. This
occur when the world passed through severe economic depression, during the period trade was decline and
profit decreased and at the end some get bankrupt and closing their
business. This situation led European
traders changed their way of prohibit colonisation and encouraged the idea of
decolonisation to their home government by introducing the legitimate trade and
this situation led the scramble and partition of Africa. Also inorder to brush
aside the depression conditions, European
power commenced to re-establish their position in areas in which they already
had set up their administration, especially along the African coast and later
in the interior.
viii) Some African ethics groups were hostile to the
early European explorers, merchants and traders, the European nations therefore
saw the need to ennex those territories where they have their agents so as to
protect their citizens. motivating the partition of Africa, during the industrial revolution machines
replaced human energetic labour, the situation led to unemployment as the
labour force required in the industries were reduced which resulted the
displaced a lot of people in cities and there was high rate of unemployment in
Europe. The European powers therefore
started to look for territories where they can establish industries and to
employ their people to curb the issue of high rate of unemployment. Forexample
in gold coast and other parts of African countries all Europeans industries
employed mostly whites while the local employees were few.
ix) Need areas for investment surplus capital. As
the economy of various European countries particularly Britain expanded and as
more capital was accumulated as the results from the trade with Africans, there
was the need for investment surplus capital, Africa served as the suitable
place to invest in exploitation of natural resources of the continent. For
instance in the gold coast European mining companies and timber firms were
established by whites to exploit the natural resources of the area so as to
serve European interest.
x) European wanted place to serve as the market for
their Industrial manufactured goods. It
was the time when the industrial revolution reached its peak in the continental
Europe particularly in Britain. Market places were needed to sale their products,
this would help to boost the continental economy and surplus goods also would
have ready market in Africa. Forexample in gold coast the European surplised
manufactured goods such as hardware, guns, gun powder, silk products, European blankets and cotton blanket as well
as glass. These goods founded ready market Since they were new and comfortable
for the large African population, not
only that but also British with gold coast as their occupied territory
benefited from this trade as they also obtained products such as gold, ivory,
animal skins and so on. Therefore, this boosted the economy of British
and they were ready to do anything is possible because of profits obtained from
that exploitative trade which in the gold coast (Ghana of today).
xi) Needs for
raw materials to feed their industries. The European territories in Africa
served as a place where raw materials could be easily obtained at relative raw
prices to feed European manufacturing industries,raw materials that were
abundance and obtained by Europeans especially in gold coast Forexample,
gold, ivory, timber,
cotton e.t.c. These products which were in greatest demand in Europe
were changed into finished goods and were sold to both Europe and Africa, this
help in the accumulation of more capital to establish other industries in
Europe. Therefore, to the Europeans Africa was very valuable at that time and
no European nation would allow other European nation to establish trade in the
occupied territories for trade.
xii) Need for national prestige : Possession of
colonies become a test and proof of national superiority before others, European countries struggled to obtain
colonies whether they were rich or not as the way of proving her superiority
and powerful than other. Eg, it was prestigious for Berligium as small country
to colonise Congo as a big country.
xiii) Strategic reason : This also was among the
factor for partition of Africa, Forexample the contest for Egypt between
Britain and France were straggle to in contral over the Suez canal which opened
as easy and short rout to India, the middle and far East. Other strategically
located areas were Cape of South Africa.
xiv)
Evangelical Christianity and humanitarian reasons.They wanted to
spread Christianity into Africa inorder
to check the spread of Islam in the continent particularly North Africa and
some part of west Africa , also Europeans wanted to stop slave trade, provide
education and civilize the World. Apart from that European wanted to spread
western civilisation, culture and western education to Africans, the Europeans they consider African as the
backward and illiterate and they saw it as their responsibility to educate and
civilize backward people after the annexation of Africa territories the
European established schools inorder to educate those barbaric people.
xv) European balance of power : European nations
wanted to colonize Africa so as to set their power at equilibrium, which was destroyed by unification of German
and Italy which created new great power at the expense of the old balance of
power determinant. Forexample, France
when defeat in the franco-prussian war in 1870-1871, the France turned
attention to Africa for colonies aiming at revival of their power and compensation
for the lost of provinces of Alsace and Lorraine, also British looked the colonies to murchy
the growing power of German and Italy
xvi) Soil
fertility. This is also among the factor which led Europeans to scramble and
partition of Africa, those fertility soil favored the productions of cash crops
forexample the areas in Zimbabwe,
Botswana, Kenya in Kikuyu high
land and so on were more scrambled and missionaries as agents of colonialism
are the one who invited their home government to take over the colonies. The
areas like Matebele and Shone region of Zimbabwe and mineral potentiality were
more scrambled by British and Portuguese,
they form a joint company known as British South Africa company (BSACO).
xvii) Technological factors that enabled European
colonial expansion, Forexample innovation of steamboat . The number of
technological development took place thus shifted the balance of power in
favour of the European. The discover of steamboat led the transport of goods by
sea. Trade of manufacturing goods tropical foodstuff such as groundnuts, cacao
and palm oil. These steamboat carrying goods between Africa and Europe also
transpoted a ruw generation of explorers.
IMPACTS
OF THE PARTITION OF AFRICA.
According to Mensah explained the impacts of partition of continent into two parts, positive
and negative impacts as a following;
1.
Positive Impacts.
i) The
partition of Africa led to industrialisation in Africa that gave the African
employment opportunities, also
industrial development brought a new technological advancement also mechanisation
grew exponentially during the colonial period Africa, in many places endowed with natural climates
that supported human life without as much support as would be needed in. Eg, Europe developed slower in terms of
technology. The advent of colonisation brough such technology to Africa.
ii) It led
to infrastructure development. The partition of Africa influence many and
different infrastructures to be brought by the European people which is very
advantageous to indigenous Africans. Also this development ensuring effective
transport and communication during that as well as nowadays, Forexample
Railway, roads, sewage system mail delivery system.
iii) In
issue of civilisation also Europeans brought new things to Africans, though
Christianity and Western Education changes the mind and attitudes of African
from their traditional lives. Forexample before the coming of western
civilisation people of Africa prayed under the trees and caves, also Africans
used their traditional Education which was mostly backward means of Education.
iv) Brought a
new system of Government. Colonisation enriched African local forms of
government bringing an alternative to absolute monarchy in some states. African
nation that practiced democracy, it brought about methods by which one could
institutionalise those system so that they become repeatable and less at risk
from loss in times of instability.
v) Brought a
competition. Competition for resources is a proponent of the robustness of a
species, the partition that led to colonisation brought more competition as
population started to grow due to settlement and the growth of formal cities
and economies. Competition led to better ways of doing things and destroy the
notion that one could just sit on land and expect to still own it forever.
vi) Increase
literary skills. The African cultures that had no written script, quickly
learnt how to get them as a result of European educators, in many parts of Africa where a written
language existed, it was previously for
a small elite as it has been in Europe in the middle ages. Besides the
profiteering colonialists came there was also a mixture of religious leaders
bent on doing. some of them did much too education in Africa.
vii) Cultural
diversification. The gene pool that came with new settlers added to the genetic
vigour of the continent from long lost relations who had evolved in a different
way.
2.
Negative impacts.
i) The
partition of Africa laid the foundation for the European to colonize the
African continent. After the partition of the continent among the various
European countries trading in Africa, any territory where a European country
had sphere of influence, legally become a colony for that European country.
Also they started to send their people as governor and Officers to govern their
new colonies in Africa. Therefore any other European country could not trade in
that colony without the permission of the governor of that colony.
ii) The
partition of Africa led to the poor demarcation of the territories in Africa by
the European is a contributing factor to the various boarder discussion between
African states which can sometimes degenerate into wars. For instance, the
Agecher strip, where the Bobo resides
illustrates the problems caused by the poor fixing of the boarders. Another is
the conflict between Nigeria and Cameroon over the Bukassi Peninsular. Also
Tanzania and Uganda fought over the Kagera land. All these are proofs of
conflicts as a result of the poor demarcation of boarders among the African
countries by the European.
iii)
Partition of continent destroy the indigenous political institutions of
the people. After the partition the European nations trading in Africa used
subtle means and Sometime force to establish their political control over the
newly acquired territory. In some cases African resisted. Even those states who
were persuaded by the European were deceived to accept European protection and
support against their neighboring aggressive state. For instance, Asantes had
to fight and resist the British for about 50 years until their final defeat in
the famous "yaaAsantewaa" war in 11990-1901.
iV) African
land was taken with food scarcity. This is because European take land, Cattle
and food produced by Africans. All this land have been used by whites to
introduce new farming system which was cash crops production. Forexample Kikuyu
high land in Kenya.
V) The
partition of Africa led to war. Forexample British Matebele war, Rhodes gained control of the minerals mines
in Matebele land and with the help of South Africa Company exploited the
mineral wealth in the area sparking the rebellion of the Matebeles against the
British. The British-Matebeles war ended with Britain easily slaughtering
thousand of Africans with the help of the machine guns.
vi) Led the
Killing of African leaders. Those leaders who could have made African strong
because of their influence, were killed
by colonisers or they arrested, this situation left the society divided and
unorganised.
vii) Africans
were subjected to the colonial experience including force labour, land
alienation, taxation, poor wages, discrimination, corporal punishment, rape and
murder. All of these were done so as to strengthen their exploitation in order
to make African inferior.
viii) Colonialists
used the divide and rule theory, this theory brought about division in the
African traditional society and setup.
Divided as we were acted to the advantage of our oppressors and
opportunists we who penetrated in the veins of our trade and agriculture and
stole pieces of land.
ix) Partition
of Africa led to the spread of diseases. Europeans came with diseases such as
measles, chicken pox, small pox, polics
that were unheard before.
x) Most
Africans were forced to fight in First World War and Second World War by
colonialists, which were their imperialist war but not our war. The African
fighters were not rewarded or their families except for badges that they
participated in helping wherever.
xi)
Destruction of indigenous Africans culture, Forexample Africans were
forced to drop their dressing codes, cut their hair and traumatised in their
own land. Also African religious ideologies rendered useless and backward,
thus, forced to drop them.
xii)
Destruction of African system of agriculture which in most parts of
Africa depend much on food crops for their survival, for instance Africans were
engaged in production of millets, maize and other root foods, and were
introduced cash crops production including cotton, sisal, coffee that feeds for
the imperialistic industries as a raw materials.
xiii) The partition of Africa led the Europeans to
come with mass murder weapons such a bombs and guns which were used in
defeating Africans resistance. For example, guns and bombs were used in maji
maji resistance whereby Africans were killed with their poor and inefficient
weapons.
xiv) Moreover, the bringing together of different
ethnic groups to form countries with no sense of national unity is another
effect of the partition of Africa. This has led to inter-ethnic wars in many
African countries over the years.Cases of inter-ethnic wars among Africans of
the same nation such as the war between the Hutus and the Tutsis in Rwanda
where thousands of people died and the conflict between the Kokomba’s and the
Nanumba’s of the northern part of Ghana serves as evidence. There also another
conflict in Ghana between the Alavanyo and the Nkonya of the Volta region of
Ghana over lands. All these inter-ethnic wars could have been avoided if
Africans were allowed to develop their social and political structures of their
own and form nation-states on their own without any external influence from
Europ
CONCLUTION.
The above points cleary demonstrate the background
as well as causes and impacts of the partition of African continent. Due to
that it prove that, even if there were an exploitation between foreigners
against Africans but some African development would not reached naturally in
that high level of development but influenced by the coming of foreign from
western world during the period of industrial revolu
Comments
Post a Comment