A COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATION
A
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATION
A
community participation in education is not new. Before discussing the ways of
community participation in education, it is important to discuss what community
is in terms of educational points of view.
Communities can be defined by characteristics that members share, such
as culture,v
language, tradition, law, geography, class and race. Some communities are homogeneous while others
are heterogeneous and some unitedv while others
conflictive. Some communities are governed and managed by leaders chosen
democratically who act relatively autonomously from other levels of government,
and some are governed by leaders imposed form above and represent central
authorities. Community participation in
education viewed as an effective means of promotingv
education both in qualitative and qualitative terms. Community is a group structure, whether
formally or informally organized, in whichv member’s plays
roles which are integrated around goals associated with the problems from
collective occupation and utilization of habitudinal space, second, members of
the community have some degree of collective identification with the occupied
space. Lastly, the community has a degree of local autonomy and responsibility.
The third one is communities based on
shared family or educational concerns, whichv include parents
association and similar bodies that are based on families shared concern for
the welfare of students.
Ø The
term participation can be interpreted in various ways depending on the context
that clarifies different degrees or level of participation, and provides
possible definition of the term, including
Ø Involvement
through the mere use of a service (such as enrolling children in school or
using a primary health care facility;
Ø Involvement
through contribution (or extraction) of money, materials and labors
Ø Involvement through ‘attendance’ (e. g. At
parent meeting at schools), implying passive acceptance of decisions made by
others;
Ø Participation
in the delivery of a service, often as a partner with other actors;
Ø Participation
as implementers of delegated powers; and
Ø Participation
in ‘real decision making at every stage’, is including identification of
problems, study of feasibility, planning, implementation, and evaluation.
Activities that Involve Participation Further provides some specific activities
that involve a high degree of participation in a wider development context,
which can also be applied in the education sector, inducing:
. Community people can play as an actor of
promoting quality education in this sense.ü Successful
schools build connections to parents and communities as a way to strengthen
relationship in support of the students, and as a way to better understand
students so that teaching can be tailored to them as individuals communities
offer a wide range of resources that are valuable to school and the families
they serve.
Power to Community Members
•
While increased community participation has been advocated as a way to improve
the quality of public projects and services, evidence from randomized
evaluations provides very mixed results about its effectiveness. While it is
clear that the details and context matter for this type of program, some common
themes about what works are beginning to emerge.
Programs where the community had more direct
control over service providers tended to work better.
• Community involvement is more effective when
people are given specific tasks and training: Training of school committees
improved how these committees handled teachers accountable to them, in India a
program that trained local volunteers to directly intervene in child learning
was very successful. • The program that compared community participation to
centralized monitoring through audits found centralized audits were more
effective in reducing corruption. • Government programs have long incorporated
mechanisms for local oversight, but there is little evidence on the
effectiveness of these programs. Found that 92% of villagers in rural Uttar
Pradesh India were not even aware of the existing Village Education Committee
(VEC), which supposedly monitored teachers and administrators.
• Working with the community on monitoring
tools that revealed just how little children were learning at school, and informing
the community of their rights to push for change prompted no increase activity
by the community, no increased teacher effort and no improvement in education
outcomes. researchers and educators have
long agreed that when parents get involved in education, children try harder
and achieve more at school (e.g., Epstein, 1995). Parents who help and
encourage their children to learn at home, and who help develop positive
attitudes toward school, contribute to the personal growth and academic success
of their children. Various approaches have been developed to help schools gain
greater parent involvement. These approaches have several features in common:
programs that focus on parenting skills and the development of home conditions
that support learning; school-to-home and home-to-school communication about
school programs and children's progress; the use of volunteers at school or in
other locations to support the school and students; and participation by
families in decision-making, governance, and advocacy (Bauch, 1994; D avies,
1991). These approaches, however, were not developed with rural communities in
mind. R ural communities differ from urban and suburban ones, and they also
differ from one another (F lora, Spears, & Swanson, 1992). Parent involvement
programs for rural communities work best when they respond to particular
features of the communities they serve. Beneficial Program Features Taking into
account both the opportunities and challenges posed by conditions of rural
life, educators can work to involve parents by setting up programs that include
features with well documented, positive results (see, e.g., Bauch, 1994;
Davies, 1991; Hinson, 1990; Swick, 1991).
Among the features most often recommended are:
• Parent enrollment in adult education and
parenting education programs;
• Cooperative strategies for extending the
school curriculum beyond the school walls;
•
Efforts to help parents provide learning experiences at home;
•
Home visits by personnel trained to facilitate home-school communication;
• In-classroom involvement of parents,
business leaders, and citizens;
• Summer enrichment programs for both parents
and children;
• Community-based learning; • use of school
facilities for community activities; an • university participation in an
advisory and supportive role.
CONCLUSION
Programs that combine these features are
indeed extensive, recognizing both strengths and weaknesses that parents may
bring to partnerships with their children's schools. Such programs recognize
that parenting improves when parents feel effective in a variety of adult
roles. But they also take into account the fact that schooling improves when a
variety of adults share their talents and model successful strategies of life
management. Moreover, when community and business organizations have a visible
presence in classroom life, students are more likely to see a meaningful
connection between their studies and their eventual success in the workplace.
REFERENCES
Nyirenda, S.D and
Ishumi A.G.(2006). Philosophy of Education: An introduction to concept,
Principles and practices. Dar es salaam,Dar es salaam university press
De Arbodela, . (1991).
‘the Colombian Escuela Nueva Educational Expirience.’’ Bulletin/The Major
project of Education in Latin America and Caribbean (International). No.
26:47-52 Decembe.
Craig, H (1996).
Schools Count: World Bank Project Designs and the Quality of primary Education
in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Fernando, R (1997). “
The Role of NGOs in Promoting Educational Innovation: A Case Study in Latin
America”. In Education and Development: Tradition and Innovation. Volume Four,
Non-Formal and Non- governmental Approaches. Edited by lynch, James; Celia
Modgil and Sohan Modgil. London: Cassell
World Bank, (1995b).
Madagascar: Towards a School-Based Strategy for Improving Primary and Secondary
Education. Washington. DC: world Bank.
UNICEF, (1992).
Strategies to Promote Girl Education: policies and programmes that work. New
York: UNICEF.
Brieger,
W.R (2006). Difinations of community. Johns Hopkins Blooberg School of public
health
Comments
Post a Comment