An Investigation on Impact of Brand Trust on Customer Repurchase Intension A case of Dangote Industrial Ltd.
STELLA MARIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
(A constituent college of Saint
Augustine University of Tanzania)
FACULTY OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION
An Investigation on Impact of
Brand Trust on Customer Repurchase Intension
A case of Dangote Industrial Ltd.
A Research Proposal Submitted to Faculty of Business
administration in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement of Award of Degree in Business Administration
at Stella Maris University Collage.
MATEZA JUDITH
STE/BBA/123106
2018CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
This
chapter deals with the background of the problem, statement of the problem,
general objectives, specific objectives, and research questions, the scope of
the study, significance of the study, and the definition of the key terms.
1.1Background of the study
In
the business world today, one of the main concerns of marketing managers is
searching for ways to increase sales and profitability products. Successful
brands try to establish a sense of trust because creating strong ties to the
customer is one of the main bases of trade ( Jing et al.,2015).
One
of the most common strategies to achieve this goal is to understand the
relationship between consumer behavior and brand and brand trust and equity,
because the brand trust and equity is often an indication of its quality which
affects the choice of consumers. In recent studies, the importance of emotional
relationship between the customer and the brand has been approved (Gianfranco
Walsh et al., 2015). Ballantyne, Varey,( 2006).strongly emphasize that the
brand equity is not only achieved by the goods and services, but also by
interactions between buyers and sellers.
It
seems that brand trust from the perspective of consumer is an appropriate
starts to assess product equity which contains a lot of interrelated dimensions
such as brand awareness, brand quality, brand association and brand loyalty
(Jing et al., 2015). This relationship includes mutual exchanges between the
brand and consumers by a duplicate set of actions that has many advantages for
both sides (Huang, Kandampully,2012).The goal of any brand is to attract and
retain customers to ensure the success of the brand and the product (Zavattaro
et al., 2015 and it is observed that consumers are looking for brands that have
specific features (Garsvaite, Caruana,2014; Londoño et al., 2016). Brand trust
and equity is a powerful tool to improve marketing productivity (Cai et al.,
2014) and evaluating brand equity is an effective way to measure customers’
satisfaction and brand performance by marketing managers (So, King, 2010; Sung
Ho et al., 2015).
Ballester
and Aleman (2001) expressed, in their study that brand trust constitutes an
important construct in marketing as it affects consumer‘s positive and
favourable attitudes, and results in brand commitment. Also analysed, that
brand trust is a predictor of consumers brand commitment, even stronger than
overall satisfaction. Chaudhuri and Holbrook (2001) examined, and linked Brand
Trust directly to purchase and attitudinal loyalty with the brand. Morgan and
Hunt (1994) projected, Brand trust on the basis of commitment-trust theory
considers trust as a key variable in developing and maintaining enduring and
highly valued brand relationships.
Jian (2003) found, that brand trust and brand
emotion influenced a customer's attitude for brand after studying, in his
research he proof that brand trust will have positive influence to the customer
loyalty.
Thomas (2009) further defined trust as an expectancy
of positive outcomes, outcomes that one can receive based on the expected
action of another party. Trust is defined as the expectation of the parties in
a transaction with any organization during service experience and even it
relates to the risks associated with assuming and acting on such expectations
by the concerned organization. An individual has trust in the occurrence of an
event if he or she expects its occurrence .Trust is the willingness to rely on
another party in the phase of risk. This eagerness comes from an understanding
of the other part based on past experience. It also raises an expectation that
the other party will create a positive outcome, without being affected by the
possibility that the effort may cause a negative outcome (Worchel, 1979). Trust
is an expectation set within particular contextual parameters and constraints.
Lewis and Weigert (1985) argued that trust is not only having the
predictability but also the confidence in the face of risk.
Rusbult,
1980) explains repurchase intention in social psychology perspective as
intention to continue or, to stay in a relationship referred to as relationship
maintenance. Customers‘ Repurchase Intention is referred to as a key to
Defensive Marketing strategies that decides business success (Cronin et al.,
2000). Companies are relying more on defensive strategy as cost of attracting a
prospective customer is becoming more expensive (Barlette, 2007). Companies are
focusing on existing customer to persuade them to make repurchase instead of
opting for an Offensive marketing strategy (Fornell, 1992). Repurchase
Intention refers to the probability or, chance of using the previous service
provider again in the future (Fornell, 1992).
Hellier,
Geursen, Carr and Rickard, (2003) explained that customers‘ intent to rebuy a
particular service depends on present situation and several possible
circumstances. Doina Olaru, Sharon Purchase and Nathan Peterson (2008), stated
that Customers‘ repurchase behavior depend largely on benefit received in their
past encounters. Patterson et al., (1997); Durvasula et al., (2004) stated the
repurchase behavior in related with customer satisfaction or, dissatisfaction.
Wathne
et al., (2001) argued that the customers repurchase intentions mainly depends
on their past experiences during several service encounters and presupposition
of future services. Kaynak, (2003) found that value added benefits will
generate satisfied loyal customers, thus will strengthen the competitive
position. Hong-Youl Ha, Swinder Janda and Siva K. Muthaly (2010), repurchase
intentions show the existing customer‘s self judgment prospective nove to
engage in rebuying from the previous service provider.
Jones and Taylor, (2007) deduced that
repurchase intention indicates customer long term relationship with am
organization and aim for his next purchase move with the same. Spreng et al.,
(1995) found that searching a new customer is much costlier than retaining the
old customer, so the continued buying behavior is an important issue of concern
for most of the companies.
Chiu
et al. (2008) observed that Repurchase Intention is usually improved on
customer‘s purchase experiences and trustworthiness of retailers. Kwek, Lau,
and Tan (2010) found that retailers should furnish right information to improve
the level of trust. Zhang, (2011) stated, As Repurchase Intention is mostly
influenced by the relationship quality with the perception of customers.
Seiders
et al, (2005) stated that, repurchase intentions showcase the customer‘s
prospect of repurchasing from the same company. Preis (2003) find increased
customer satisfaction is one factor leading to such increased repurchase
intentions.
1.2.
Statement of the Problem
It
is a promise of brand with their customers to fulfil their expectations. Brand
trust is an important item that helps customer loyal to the brand. Without the
trust on brand customer can’t enter in loyalty set. To build a trust it’s
important for the Consumer to take and asses the information from the product.
Companies can build emotional trust if they can prove that the brand is only
for the customers and meet their expectations (e.g. brand is trustworthiness
and friendly for the family use).Consistent brand demonstrate this specific
behaviour. The customers trust on specified brand functions and willingness to
purchase the brand from the product class (Moormal et al 1993). The vagueness
in the situation can be diminishes by the trust through which customer can rely
on the specific trusted brand product. Brand loyalty is a result of brand trust
or promises that build the highly valued connections Morgan and Hunt 1994,
Chaudhuri and Holbrook, 2001).Some scholars defined commitment as "an
enduring desire to maintain a valued relationship" (Moorman, Zaltman, and
Deshpande 1992).So promises are the cause of constant on going and retaining a
relationship build between company and consumer.
Focusing
on brand trust creates a close
relationship between the brand and the customer and will lead to the selection
of the brand by making a good image of the particular organization and its
services in the mind of consumers. Also, in today's technological age,
customers have more interactions with each other and convey their purchase
information which influence on their brand repurchase decisions.
Many studies show that much research on
the challenge brand, trust and repuchasing. However there is no study that reported
on the Impact of brand trust on customer repurchases intentionin Dangote
Industry Limited which research is going to concentrate on. Therefore this
study intended to bridge the gap by An Assessment of the Impact of brand trust
on customer repurchases intention in Dangote Industry Limited..
1.3 Research Objectives
1.3.1 General Objectives
The
general objective of this study is to investigate on the Impact of brand trust
on customer repurchases intention. A case study of Dangote Industry Limited.
1.3.2 Specific Objectives
i)
To determine the impacts of quality on customers repurchase intention.
(ii)
To determine the impacts of sales promotion on customers repurchase intention.
(iii)
To asses on how price play a mediating role on customers repurchase intention.
1.4 Research Questions
i)
Does quality have an impact on customer’s repurchase intention?
(ii)
Does sales promotion have impacts on customer’s repurchase intention.?
(iii)
Does price play a mediating role on repurchases intention?
1.5 Significance of the Study
The
research will be useful to the Government to put efficiency and effective measures,
policies and effort that will strengthening the companies in providing good
services.
The
research will be useful to University College to make references on study to
see how the college can help the organizations as experts to the growth of the
organizations dealing with.
The
research will useful for me to pursue a Bachelor Degree of Business
Administration as University Student at STELLA MARIAS University College.
1.6. Scope of the study
This
study will deal with is to investigate on the Impact of brand trust on customer
repurchases intention in Dangote Industry Limited. The study will use
respondents from the organization found in Dangote Industry Limited.
1.7 Limitations of the Study
The
researcher expect to face the following challenges when collecting the data and
also a research will find the alternative way so as to solve them, so as to
make sure the data will be successful collected, as follows;
Shortage
of enough time, still the research will be conducted while classes, the
researcher will balance the time and use the time which lesson will not be
conducted so as to collect the data.
Shortage
of fund, because to conduct a research needs fund, but the research will
balance the money for meals so as to make sure the data are successful
collected, analyzed and presented.
Poor cooperation
from the cruel respondents, the researcher will use polite language and
convincing them so as to get the data from the respondents who will not be able
to provide the data.
1.8 Definition of the key term
Brand trust
Brand trust is
an important item that helps customer loyal to the brand. Without the trust on
brand customer can’t enter in loyalty set. To build a trust it’s important for
the Consumer to take and asses the information from the product. Companies can
build emotional trust if they can prove that the brand is only for the
customers and meet their expectations (e.g. brand is trustworthiness and
friendly for the family use).Consistent brand demonstrate this specific
behaviour. The customers trust on specified brand functions and willingness to
purchase the brand from the product class (Moormal et al 1993).
Customer Repurchase intention
Rusbult, 1980)
explains repurchase intention in social psychology perspective as intention to
continue or, to stay in a relationship referred to as relationship maintenance.
Customers‘ Repurchase Intention is referred to as a key to Defensive Marketing
strategies that decides business success (Cronin et al., 2000). Companies are
relying more on defensive strategy as cost of attracting a prospective customer
is becoming more expensive (Barlette, 2007). Companies are focusing on existing
customer to persuade them to make repurchase instead of opting for an Offensive
marketing strategy (Fornell, 1992) that tries to acquire new customers and
increase the market share. Repurchase Intention refers to the probability or,
chance of using the previous service provider again in the future (Fornell,
1992). Jackson (1985) explained ―repurchase intent‖ is a consumer behavioral
intention that indicates the tendency to stay, continue or, leave the service
from a current supplier. The Repurchase Intention measures can be obtained from
surveys
assessing tendency of current customers to repurchase used or, bought brand,
product/service belonging to the same company.(Cronin et al., 2000).
2.4 Conceptual Framework
Independent variable
Dependent variable
Customer repurchasing intention |
Loyal customer Customer preference Customer commitment |
Brand trust |
Quality Sales
promotion Price
|
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This
chapter presents the related literature review, empirical review, research gap
from information related to the problem of research in the study, and
theoretical frame work.
2.1 Related literature review
Weun,
(1997) found that satisfaction level determines repurchase intention of a
customer that affect customer‘s relationship with a company, its profitability
and even its success. Hellier et al., 2003; Zeithaml et al., (1996) defined
Repurchase Intention as the individual‘s estimation to rebuy a service and
involve in future transaction with the same parent company. Lin et al , 2005,
Cronin et al. (2000) found a direct relationship of perceived value with
word-ofmouth communication and repurchase intentions.
Kuan,
Bock, & Vathanophas, (2008) mentioned that possibility of customer to
repurchase from previous retailer again and again in future. Cronin, Brady, and
Hult (2000) depicted that quality of service quality parameters have direct
significant effect on customers‘ behavioral intentions. Mummalaneni & Meng,
(2009) deduced that the quality of service provided by the company in terms of
timeliness, responsiveness, accuracy, empathy, feedback etc. persuade the
customers to repurchase the products. Ranaweera & Neely (2003) affirmed the
same stating it even inspirit customer retention.
Jackson
(1985) explained ―repurchase intent‖ is a consumer behavioral intention that
indicates the tendency to stay, continue or, leave the service from a current
supplier. The Repurchase Intention measures can be obtained from surveys
assessing tendency of current customers to repurchase used or, bought brand,
product/service belonging to the same company. The ―behavioral intentions‖ and
―repurchase intention‖ are synonymous constructs (Cronin et al., 2000).
Kotler
(1998) observed that customer
satisfaction depends on the extent
to which customers’ expectations about the services are fulfilled and
these expectations are not static.kotler futher
noted that good customer service
among other things entails keeping the promises
made to customers and not guaranteeing things that cannot be possible given the nature
of the operating environment .To
provide an excellent service
to customers the
organization should deliver beyond the expectation s of the customers.
Buil et al., (2013) states that,
A strong brand can make more money based on perception of quality,
uniqueness and its other associations. basic idea of using a brand refers to
the enhancement of the value of a product when the producers realized that
competition through price leads to lower profitability. Profitability reduction
through price competition made them to apply methods to increase loyalty and
brand value.
One of the factors that indicate the individuals’ willingness to
determine the extra costs is the consumers’ perspective towards brand equity
(Zavattaro et al., 2015).
Tolba,
Hassan,(2009) states that,.Brand preference can be the start for the consumers’
decision to buy. Some studies show that there is a positive correlation between
brand preference and consumers’ decision to buy. brand is valuable in the eyes
of customers when customers prefer them to other brands, and have the name of
brand and its attributes in mind for a long time (Kumar et al., 2004). Over
time, services and products become more similar to each other, because
competitors imitate the new products quickly. This makes it difficult for
consumers to differentiate products(Chang et al., 2015).The main purpose of
advertising and promotion operation is to achieve excellence, a place where a
brand is more favorable than its competitors. Brand excellence is essential to
consumers in the purchase of products (Buil et al., 2013).
Belch
Vilch, 2004) stated that, Purchase intention pints to the consumer’s
willingness to purchase the product of a brand . When purchase intention is
higher, it is also more likely to purchase. So, purchase intention is the most
important predictor of purchase behavior (Long- Yi, Jui-chi, 2012). Branding
studies show that brand equity is an important factor in the consumers’
purchase intention increase and encourages them to buy more (Jing et al.,
2015). Purchase intention is one of the steps of purchase intention, because it
studies the behavior of the consumer to purchase a particular brand. Consumer’s
intention to buy a brand is formed not only by the attitude toward the brand, but
also by considering a series of other brands (Shah et al., 2012).
Oliver
(1999) recommended that in most scenarios customers calculate price by
contrasting the benefits or facilities presented by the supplier in exchange
that results in satisfaction or dissatisfaction. In businesses, price is well
thought-out as most important aspect in creating revenues for the
organizations. It affects satisfaction as the consumers evaluate the merits or
benefits received against the given fair price (Cronin et al., 2000).
Malik et al. (2012) found in their research that fair price directly
affects customer satisfaction. Virvalaite et al. (2015) indicated that
fair price is the dominant factor leading towards the customer loyalty. They
also argue that fair price is the most influential element of loyalty than of
satisfaction.
Aaker,
(1996), stated that Brand awareness is the aptitude of a potential purchaser to
categorize or memorize the brand associated to a specific product type. Brand
awareness encompasses a scale from an unclear sensation that the brand is
unknown to faith that it is merely one in the product group. Aaker and Keller
(1990) thought that brands with higher awareness and good image can encourage
brand loyalty in consumers, and the greater the brand awareness is, the greater
the brand trust and purchase intention are to consumers.
Oliver,
1999) stated that, Loyalty is explained as an exceptionally held assurance of a
customer purchasing a particular product repetitively in upcoming time
regardless of the promotion and conditional efforts, and is prone to shifting
of brands. The challenges faced by the firms due to anticipated customers'
needs are: (1)the improved choice, (2) greater value of their money and (3)
increased level of service (Kandampully and Suhartanto, 2000). Loyalty can be
advantageous for both the organizations and the customers. Consumers are
prepared and ready to submit their loyalty and ready to repurchase the products
of the firm that is able to deliver them high value products and services in
contrast to competitors' offerings (Reichheld and Teal, 2001).
According
to Kan, (2002)Trust is the guarantee that a customer will get what he wants
from the organization or the company, instead of what the company offers. Trust
includes hope that other party will generate outstanding returns regardless of
the chances that the action may generatebad returns. Delgado-Ballester and Luis
Munuera-Alemán (2005) suggested that if an organization want to maintain a
long-term relationship with its consumers, it should build trust among the
company and its customer as when trust is involved, both will act at their best
to take advantages of this good relationship and will result in loyalty. Sarwar
et al. (2012) stated that trust has positive relationship with customer
loyalty, but they are unable to find any relationship between trust and
customer loyalty in service industry.
Repurchase
intention indicates the customers' keenness to purchase persistently from the
firm or company.
Lacey
and Morgan (2008) described the repurchase intention as persons' decisions for
purchasing a particular product or service from the identical company/ firm for
second time, keeping in view of his present condition and surroundings.
Customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, perceived value and trust all of these
are the driving forces of consumer repurchases intention (Hellier et al.,
2003). Customer retention is a decisive step for a firm; this in return can
directly impact the firms' bottom line. So most firms seek different ways to
develop more customer retention. Olaru et al. (2008) proposed that
perceived value positively influence the repurchase intention. He also
recommended that repurchase intent will show the way to give suggestions to
others to purchase the same product. Mosavi and Ghaedi (2012) suggested that
trust has a progressive association with repurchase intention. Sarwar et al.
(2012) supported that there is a bond linking trusts and repurchase intend.
Rowley, (2005) stated that Customers demand of differentiated offerings or, benefits at different stages define the level of service satisfaction given to a customer that help in generating loyalty among customers. It‘s a trusted attribute that loyalty is function of two reciprocal actions that is expectation and actual experiences. Brown (1952) referred loyal customer are those who buys more, willing to pay more, and a great supporter of firms. Lip Stein (1959) and Kuehn (1962), defined loyalty as a measure of probability of product repurchase. Oliver (1997) defined Customer Loyalty as a deep commitment which merely get influenced by any situational behavior caused by several marketing efforts of different brands, it shows re-buy intent or re-patronize the same preferred product or service consistently and repeatedly in future.
Hayes (2008) explored that loyal customers are profitability drivers of a company. It even indicates a repurchase commitment and long term relationship. Bowen and Shoemaker, 2003) argued that loyal customers are likely to less price sensitive and do not switch like non-loyal customers. Blackton, (1995) stated that loyal customers are important assets to a company. Tseng, (2007) emphasized on same stating that vendors should keep loyal customers to generate long term profit from them. Hayes, (2008) observed that a company‘s effort to persuade existing customers to repurchase will strengthen its position. Wulf et al. (2001) elaborated the behavioral loyalty construct as a combined measurement of money spent at a retail outlet and repurchasing patterns with the same in comparison of the other outlets. Morgan and Hunt (1994) found buyer‘s commitment and behavioral outcomes of that relationship like acquiescence, propensity to leave and cooperation have a positive significant relationship. Oliver, (1999) & Reichheld and Sasser, (1990) found that growth and profitability is mainly effected by a prime factor and that is customer loyalty. Berry, (1995) suggested in his findings that loyalty ultimately result in improved profitability through reduction in promotional activities and increasing sales. Dwyer et al., (1987) and Hennig -Thurau et al., (2002) observed that markeing expenses on promotional activities reduces due to positive word of mouth publicity by loyal customers.
Customer
Loyalty on repuchasing indicates a long term relationship between customers and
the company that supports increase in sales with no promotional investment.
Faullant et al. (2008), customer satisfaction is an important driver of
loyalty. Lee, Lee, and Feick (2001) examined the cost effect on the
satisfaction and loyalty level in the service and found that switching costs
have a moderating effect on customer loyalty. Hirschman (1970) explained that
Customer Loyalty is a conscious, calculated behavior towards a service or, a
company. Chaffey (2008) defined consumer loyalty as a conduct of customer to
take continued service with a particular company. Kotler and Armstrong (2008)
viewed repeated purchasing behavior as an indicator to measure customer loyalty
to repurchase the product.
Parasuraman
et al, 1988) stated that, service quality contains the exchange of
relationships between salesperson and the purchasers. Due to the better
services provided customer wants to avail the services at shop. This resulted in
the extensive coordination between salesperson and consumer. Service quality
can be defined as the divergence between customer image about the service
presentation and his/her expectations for services. Service quality is an
essential item in building the brand trust and defined in other words as the
decisions that are resultant from estimation process in which customers
differentiate the service provided to them and the services they perceived
(Gronroos (1984). The customer’s decision about the whole performance of the
service product ( Zeithaml 1988). If the quality experienced by the customer is
according to the quality they expect about the brand this resulted in a better
service and perceived quality Gronroos (1988). Some scholars suggested that only
those elements have major effect on brand loyalty that is not intangible but
gives response (Kayaman and Arasli 2007). The quality perceived by the customer
and their satisfaction level the indirect link among brand trust and service
quality can be defined (Chitty et al., 2007).
The
customer’s perception about the product and services quality. It is the
perception of the customer created by the companies through the advertising
publicities, and other social media intend to purchase the product. In general it
is the feeling of customer about product quality and its features provided to
them such a performance and reliability of the product. The promises made by
the brand product to meet the expectations of the customers (Zenithal, 1988).
Basically there are two phases of the quality objective and perceived quality.
According to, Zeithaml (1988) objective quality has no validity and valuations
of the quality. Furthermore from this point of view perceived quality is
significant among them which are also a second phase or part of the quality.
The customer valuations for the product quality and services either product
meets the expectations (Olsen, 2002). It is a relative concept that can change
the people’s experiences and expectations of that product brand.
2.2 Empirical studies
Bramall,
Schoefer, & Mc Kechnie (2004) found that customers‘ needs in acheiveing
satisfaction, long term profitability and the customer‘s retention can be
gained through promise, reputation and offline presence.
Swaen
& Chumpitaz (2008) stated that, there are three major aspects of Customer repurchases which
includes perceived credibility, perceived integrity, and perceived benevolence.
Chiu et al.(2008) concluded e-retailers and online buyers repurchase intentions
mainly depend on purchase experiences during transactions and trust levels
generated by e-retailers. Chiu, Chang, Cheng, and Fang (2008) and Compeau
(2009) found that customers‘ Repurchase Intention in online shopping is having
a significant relationship with customers trust. Chun Ha, Yang-Kyu, &Cho
(2011) affective trust includes the characteristics of openness, benevolence,
liking, honesty, understanding, and respect. Butler (1991) deduced ten
antecedents of customer trust, namely, availability, competence, consistency, discreetness,
fairness, integrity, locality, openness, promise fulfillment and receptivity.
McKnight et al. (1998) mentioned that a person‘s trustworthiness includes
benevolence, honesty, and competence as the core cognitive beliefs that one
individual during evaluation of others.
Practical
studies illustrate that satisfaction is the predecessor of brand trust,
intention to rebuy the product and behavior of brand towards its customers
(Russell- Bennett et al., 2007). Brand trust can increased by the satisfaction of
customer and repeat the purchase of the same product services (LaBarbera and
Mazursky, 1983). In the research repurchase and consumption of the product
leads to the two phases of loyalty that are as, loyalty to purchase and loyalty
towards attitude or behavior through which it can be determined either
consumers will purchase those services or move to other that are more
preferable (Bennett, Härtel, and McColl- Kennedy, 2005)
Lu
and Lin (2002) analyze customer purchasing behaviors in Internet media under the
structure of “belief-attitude-behavior tendency”. The cognition part of
“belief-attitude-behavior tendency” relates to the cognition of brand equity,
these include three parts: the cognition of products and service content, the
cognition of the servicescape in which products and services are provided and
the cognition of hardware facilities for providing products and services. These
three factors will directly impact the customer attitude toward products and
services, meanwhile customer cognition and attitude will affect repurchase
behaviors.
Chung
(2002) studies the impact of brand image and country of origin on brand
evaluation, purchase attitude and purchase intention. Conclusions show, in most
product categories, brand image is more important than country of origin.
Ataman and Ulengin (2003) think brand image is the major reason that customers
make choices from different brands. Hsieh et al. (2004) consider the corporate
image and country of origin have significant impact on customer choice, while local
culture features and traditions can adjust the effect of product image. Oliver
(2010) thinks customer satisfaction is the concentrated performance of customer
expectation on quality, the perception of actual quality, the perceived service
quality, the perception of brand image and the perception of cost performance.
Cronin
et al. (2000) consider service contact, service environment and product quality
will influence the overall customer perceived service quality; while the level
of perceived quality will influence customer satisfaction and customer value;
perceived quality, customer satisfaction, customer value will have impact on
customer post-purchase behaviors. The study of Olsen (2002) verifies that
satisfaction is the mediator between perceived quality and repurchase
intention.
Baker
and Crompton (2000) make an analysis on tourism, indicating customer perceived
quality is not in significant correlation with complaining behaviors, but is in
significant positive correlation with repurchase intention, customer loyalty
and willingness to pay premium price. Sivadas and Baker-Prewitt (2000) receive
different conclusions in a study of the department store industry: service
quality influences the customer attitude orientation and satisfaction of the
department store industry, while satisfaction has impact on attitude
orientation, repurchase and recommendation but no direct impact on department
store loyalty.
Bearden
and Teel (1983) discover in a study of automobile services, attitude plays a
mediator role on the impact of customer satisfaction on purchase intention.
Jones and Sasser (1995) consider the relationship between customer satisfaction
and customer repurchase behaviors will be influenced by the competitive
condition in the industry. Spreng and Mackoy (1996) think satisfaction has
significant impact on brand attitude and brand loyalty. Fournier (1998) studies
the impact of six kinds of customer-brand relationships on customer repurchase
intention, habitual purchase and the willingness of WOM communication. Roberts
et al. (2003) analyze the impact of customer-enterprise and customer-brand
relationship on customer behaviors, suggesting the services provided by
companies in the service industry influence the formation of relationship to
some extent.
The
study of Chaudhuri and Holbrook (2002) discover, an active emotional response
against a brand has a relatively high positive correlation will brand loyalty
and will reduce the customer sensibility on price. Ataman and Ulengin (2003)
consider customer-brand relationship to be the key factor that influences
customer acceptance and recognition degree of a brand. Erdem and Swait (2004)
study the impact of brand trustworthiness and brand expertise on customer
choice in different product categories, proving brand trustworthiness has
greater impact on customers.
Bertoncelj
and Moisescu (2010) points out that one way to persuade the customers and
increase the market share is to create a powerful brand and reinforce it which
would lead to establish long-term and interactive relationships among
stakeholders and more importantly the customers. In addition, some researchers
believe that focusing on some features of brand could be as an important factor
in persuading the customers and success of organisations.
Many
factors are involved in the purchase intention of a customer and having them in
mind could persuade the customer to use and buy the brand. They include brand
personality (Aggarwal,
2004),
brand equity (Aaker, 1991) and eWOM (Park & Lee, 2009).
Rekom,
Jacobs and Verlegh (2006) believed that when customers know the product quality
self-right and competitors can easily copy the product features, the strong
brand identity and personality can be high valuable in shaping of brand equity.
The
research by Roberts et al. (2003) verifies that perceived quality influences
post-purchase behaviors indirectly by influencing relationships. Zeithaml et
al. (1996) think overall perceived quality has a significant relationship with
customer behavioral intentions.
In
a study entitled “Studying the effect of brand equity on consumer response,
Hosseini et al. (2009) concluded that there is a positive significant
relationship between the four dimensions of loyalty, quality, awareness and
willingness to spread brand.
Karbaspour
,Yardel (2009) conducted a study entitled “Evaluation of brand equity and the
affecting factors from the consumer’s perspective. The results showed that
brand loyalty and association factor have direct impact on brand equity, and
the factor of perceived quality has indirect impact on brand equity through
loyalty.
In a study entitled “Evaluation of the impact
of brand equity on the continuation and promotion of customer relationship in
the banking industry” Bavarsad et al. (2013) found that the willingness of
customers to adopt Internet banking services is under the direct influence of
brand equity.
In
a study entitled “Evaluation of the impact of brand equity on the consumer
behavior in cellphone and computer shopping malls”, Anaraki et al.
(2013)discussed the proposed model and confirmed the role of brand equity
dimensions on customer reactions.
2.3 Research gap
Many studies show that much research on
the challenge brand, trust and repuchasing. However there is no study that reported
on the Impact of brand trust on customer
repurchases intentionin Dangote Industry Limited which research is going to
concentrate on. Therefore this study intended to bridge the gap by An Assessment of the Impact of brand trust
on customer repurchases intention in Dangote Industry Limited.
2.4 Theoretical framework
2.4.1 Social Exchange Theory
Social
Exchange Theory (Thibaut and Kelley, 1959) explains repurchase intention in
social psychology perspective as intention to continue or, to stay in a
relationship referred to as relationship maintenance. Customers‘ Repurchase
Intention is referred to as a key to Defensive Marketing strategies that
decides business success (Cronin et al., 2000). Companies are relying more on
defensive strategy as cost of attracting a prospective customer is becoming
more expensive (Barlette, 2007). Companies are focusing on existing customer to
persuade them to make repurchase instead of opting for an Offensive marketing
strategy (Fornell, 1992) that tries to acquire new customers and increase the market
share.
2.4.2
Motivation Theory:
A
motivated and qualified workforce is crucial to increase productivity and the
quality of the organisational services in order to achieve organizational
objectives. The challenge and dilemma for many managers is how to create this
type of motivation (Dieleman and Toonen, 2006:1). While there are many theories
surrounding the notion of motivation, two distinct areas of motivation are
usually mixed (Dieleman and Toonen, 2006:1). That is the emphasis placed on
motivation to be rooted in a job and motivation to perform (Dieleman and Toonen
2006:1). Both are very vital and managers have to critically understand the
impact of their activities in both areas (Dieleman and Toonen 2006:1).
Motivation
is significant because even people with the required knowledge, skills, and
abilities will perform poorly if they are not motivated to devote their time
and effort to work (Harris in Milapo, 2001: 29). Workers have needs which a
workplace must fulfil in order to avoid demotivation. When workers lack
motivation they tend to resort to anti-work behaviours such as
absenteeism,
negligence of duty, late-coming, failure to meet deadlines, display of open
frustration and all these factors work negative to the performance and
credibility of an organization. Organizations need to place all efforts to
ensure that incentives such as intrinsic motivators, extrinsic motivators and
performance management approaches are used in order to retain, attract,
increase workers efforts, satisfaction and commitment.. Therefore, motivation
theory will be basis for this study because achieving higher levels of
performance on ensuring customer care in order customer to repurchase requires
attending to how best individuals can be motivated through quality services,
incentives and performance management approaches. thus will bring satsification
of customer.
2.3.1THEORY OF REASONED ACTION
(TRA)
TRA is proposed by Fishbein and Ajzen (1975)
and is widely used in the consumer behavior literature and purchase intention
studies (i.e. Botha & Atkins, 2005; Beadnell, Baker, Gillmore, Morrison,
Huang & Stielstra, 2008; Alsughayir & Albarq, 2013). This theory
assumes an individual's intention to perform a behavior as a function of; his
or her attitude towards that behaviour in a special situation; the norms
governing the behavior in such situation and the motivation to follow these
norms (subjective norms).
Since
TRA is very instrumental and practical where the individual is personally
responsible for his or her purchase intentions (Hakkak, Vahdati, & Mousavi
Nejad, 2015), it seems that it is a suitable framework to study the effects of
brand trust on customers' repurchase intentions.
2.3.2 PRODUCT EVALUATION MODEL
(PEM).
Chung
and Pysarchik (2000) believed that TRA may not be absolutely accurate and
others such as Collen & Hoekstra (2001) stated that the other external
variables could be used to explain the purchase intention.
One
of these variables is the perceived value of customer which is clearly provided
in PEM proposed by Dodds, Monroe and Grewal (1991) and has been recently noted
as a constant factor in predicting the repurchase intention (Chi, Yeh &
Tsai, 2011; Ainscough, Trocchia & Gum, 2009). This model regards the
repurchase intention as a function of the perceived value and indicates that
the customer's perception of quality and credibility initially influences on
the perceived value and then, this perceived value affects on their evaluation
of the repurchase intention. It should be noted that if the customers do not
maintain a good attitude toward the product or ignore the behavioral norms,
then they will not have any tendency to repurchase. Therefore, we tried to
combine TRA and PEM to evaluate and predict the customers' intentions more
accurately. Moreover, a range of attitude, subjective norms and perceived value
are considered to evaluate the customers' intentions.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
3.0
Introduction
This chapter deals with research design,
research approach, targeted population, sampling techniques, sample size, area
of study, data collection techniques and data analysis and approach.
3.1
Research Design
Research design is the framework that has
been created to seek answers to research questions. (Creswell, J.W (2012). Therefore,
the research design refers to the overall strategy that you choose to
integrate the different components of the study in a coherent and logical way. Therefore a researcher will use descriptive
design in order to make comparisons among the respondents so as to attain
accurate information from the respondents, and to assess the impact of brand trust on customer repurchases intention in Dangote
Industry Limited.
3.2 Research Approach
Research approach refers to the arrangement
of conditions for collection and analysis of data in manner that aims to
combine relevance to the research purpose with (Kothari 2004). The study will
applied mixed research approach which is defined as a procedure of collecting,
analysis and mixing both, qualitative data and quantitative data in a single
study to understand a research a problem. Mixed
method research is a methodology for conducting research that involves
collecting, analyzing and integrating (or mixing) quantitative and qualitative
research (and data) in a single study. (Creswell et al 2003)The
importance of using mixed approach provides a more complete and comprehensive
understanding of the research problem, also helps to explain findings.
The qualitative data will be presented in
words while quantitative data will presented in statistics through tables and
numbers. Through this procedure the researcher will be able to obtain accurate
data which will be easily to describe, analyze and present them.
3.3
Targeted Population
A population is a summation of all the
organism of the same group or space, who lives in the some geographical area
and have the capability of interbreeding or group of people of an individual
from which sample size are taken for measurement example army, students and
teachers (Donald 2006). Therefore, the population of study will marketing
department, supply department and customers.
Kothari (2004) defines sample as a collection
of some parts of the population on the basis of which judgment is made small
enough to convenient data collection and large enough to be true representative
of the population from which it had been selected. Sample size refers to
the number of items to be selected from the universe to constitute a sample
(Kothari2004). The study will comprise of 50 respondents; as 10 sales persons,
8 distributors, and 32 transporter/driver. This study will be having total of
(50) respondents. All respondents will be given questioner by the researcher by
using the instruments which will be provided.
Table
1 Shows a Chart of Respondents who will be used
S/N |
|
RESPONDENTS |
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS |
1 |
|
Sales persons |
10 |
2 |
|
Transporter/drivers |
32 |
3 |
|
Distributors |
8 |
|
|
TOTAL |
50 |
Source : researcher 2017
3.5 Sampling and sampling
techniques.
Sampling
is a procedure a researcher uses to gather people, places or things to study.
It is a process of collecting a number of individuals or objects from a
population such that the selected group contain elements of representative of
the characteristics found in the inter group (Kombo and Tromp, 2006). Sampling
techniques is the procedure used to select sample, Kothari (2004). This study will use purposive sampling
techniques.
This involves on picking unity of most
relevant or knowledge in the subject matter and study them (Omari, 2011).This
is choosing the particular units of the universe for constituting a sample on
the basis that they are selected out of the huge one would by typical or
represent the whole (Kothari, 2004), Hence this technique will be
used by a researcher to select the drivers
of Dangote trucks, distributors of Dangote cements and sales persons of Dangote, because these respondents have detail information about the impact
of brand trust on customer repurchases intention.
This
study will be conducted in Dangote industry limited. This is saturated in Mtwara region in southern part of
Tanzania. The Municipal is boarded by Indian Ocean in East and Mtwara district
council in all other direction. The region occupies 16720 km or 1.9% of
Tanzania mainland area of 8859 87 square km. Mtwara-Mikindani Municipality
council is one among six district council of Mtwara region. Other districts
includeTandahimba, Newal, Masasi, Nanyamba and Mtwara rural district (Municipal
profile 2008). The main
economic activities are; fishing, mining, agriculture, industries and trade
development. The
study will be conducted so as to identify the Impact of brand trust on customer
repurchases intention in Dangote Industry Limited.
3.5
Data collection instruments
The study will use both primary
data and secondary data collection methods during the study. Kothari (1990)
defines primary data as those data which are collected a fresh and for the
first time and thus happen to be original in character. Also Secondary data are
those data which have already collected by other researchers, documentary
review Kothari (2004) Therefore, this will involve data from respondents
through questionnaires and interview as well as documentary review.
3.5.1 Interview
Kothari
(2004) contends that Interview is very useful because it carries out at the
same time to the respondents and interviewer. Is the method of collecting data
which involve presentation of oral-verbal stimuli and reply in terms of
oral-verbal responses. This method will help the researcher to get information
from respondents because it paves the way to oral discussion between the
respondents and interviewer or a researcher. This
is because it allows the respondents who have detailed information and
knowledge to give more explanation to the research problem. Both structured and unstructured
interview will be used so as to obtain data from the respondents as far as to
collect the data or information from the targeted population. In
this study, this method will be used to interview marketing depertment and
supply department, because the researcher need explanation in details as they
will be the key informants in this study for the purpose of knowing their
suggestions and opinions towards the Impact of brand trust on
customer repurchases intention in Dangote Industry Limited.
3.5.2
Questionnaire
Kothari
(2004) state that questionnaires; are questions that have to be filled by the
respondents. in this study
questionnaires will be used to ask customers, marketing department and supply
department, the researcher will need details to be fulfilled to the question
papers. The researcher will use two types of questionnaires, the closed form
and open form questions. The closed form questions demand for short check mark
responses to show one’s reply yes/no or items demands brief statement
to fill an empty line. The open form questions need the free responses
of the participants own words, it aims at collecting the participants’ ideas
towards the problem in the questions. The
questions will be addressing the
specific objectives of the study and research questions.
3.5.3.
Documentary Source
The researcher will collect data
from different documentary sources which had already been collected by other
researchers. Researcher will visit Library to gather data that are already in
existence and form the base for general review to develop and understand on the
situation. Also information will be gathered from published and unpublished
document such as past report on research done on similar subject. However,
researcher collected secondary information such as organization structure,
mission, and vision. The main aim of getting secondary data is to compare with,
and complement the primary data about the Impact of brand trust on customer
repurchases intention.
3.8 Data Analysis and Presentation.
Data
analysis is the process of interpreting data, data processing entails;
editing,coding and classification (Kothari,2004). Therefore, data analysis refers to the process
of bringing orders,
structure and meaning to the mass. Hence the
study will use mixed approach method due to the fact that qualitative method
involves description and explanation while quantitative method used average,
chart and percentage in analyzing data. The data obtained from the field of
study will be coded and analyzed through content analysis by which explanation
provided by respondents will be analyzed through its contents in relation to
the study objectives. MS-excel will be used to prepare table that show the
finding result through frequency and percentages.
3.9 Validity and reliability of data
3.9.1 Validity
Validity is the degree to which results obtained from the analysis of the
data actually represents the phenomenon under study. Kothari (2004) states that
validity measures the accuracy of the instruments in obtaining the anticipated
data which can meet the objectives of the study. To ensure validity, the
researcher will Data will be collected from the reliable
sources.
3.9.2
Reliability
According
to Saunders et al. (2003) reliability refers to the degree to which data
collection method or methods yield consistent findings, similar observations
would be made or conclusions reached by other researchers or there is
transparency in how sense is made from the raw data. Kothari (2004) defines
reliability as the ability of a measuring instrument to provide consistent
results. The followings will be used as ways so as to ensure consistency
results, as: different respondents will be asked the same questions in
different times to see if they would produce the same answers when asked
several times, ad questionnaire will be divided into parts in order for
respondents to concentrate more on each question.
2.3.1.2. Price
In
view of Smith and Carsky (1996) in today’s markets, price is the most salient
factor contributing to making choices. Assuncao and Robert (1990) is of the
view that when faced with a buying decision in a product category consumers
observe a price and considers their current budget position towards that
product before making a purchase decision. In most cases when a consumer is
exposed to alternatives there is a tendency to select a product that maximizes
greatest utility based on the available brands. Price alone in the absence of
other cues is a powerful contributing factor in considering how the brands were
perceived. Consumers face brands with varying prices and perceived quality
levels and they make a choice consistent with the relative value attached to
both attributes.
s
Comments
Post a Comment