Illustrate the Portuguese participation in slave trade in Tanzania
STELLAMARISMTWARAUNIVERSITYCOLLEGE (STEMMUCO) (A
Constitute College of Saint Augustine University of Tanzania)
STELLAMARISMTWARAUNIVERSITYCOLLEGE
(STEMConstituteCollegeofSaint
FACULTY OF EDUCATION
UNIT:
HISTORY
COURSE
TITLE:
ECONOMIC HISTORY OF TANZANIA
COURSE
CODE: HI 360
INSTRUCTOR.
: MWALIMU. VICTOR
ASSIGMENT: GROUP 06
SUBMISSION
DATE
FEBR,2021
S/N |
NAMES |
REG:
NO |
SIGNATURE |
1.
|
DIANADEOGRASSAID |
STE/BAED/165185 |
|
2.
|
EUNICE NSONGOMACHARLES |
STE/BAED/164312 |
|
3.
|
GEORGE W NGOMA |
STE/BAED/164163 |
|
4.
|
ISACK
A DANIEL |
STE/BAED/165196 |
|
5.
|
KRISTOMS K MATEMBO |
STE/BAED/164291 |
|
6.
|
MARTINMBUNGU |
STE/BAED/164220 |
|
7.
|
ONESMOYUSTINMALANDO |
STE/BAED/164236 |
|
8.
|
REBECAP.PANKALAS |
STE/BAED/165195 |
|
9.
|
SAID
RAMADHAN NGELANGELA |
STE/BAED/164854 |
|
TASK:
Illustrate the Portuguese participation in
slave trade in Tanzania.
introduction
Oral information is the verbal message which are reported from the past
beyond the present generation Vansina, J(1985), . The message must be oral
statement spoken, sung or called out on
musical instruments. Evaluation is the process which aim at judging the value
nature or characteristics of quality of something or some one . In the arena of
oral information evaluation means to alter information from the past to give it
new meaning or to pass value judgment to oral accounts collected. in evaluating
oral hi Historian uses various rules evaluating oral information
The social and political context of
the oral testimonies has to be known, in evaluating oral
information an historian mist be aware with social status of the informant that
Will help him to determine his or her perspective toward the event(Vansina,
J1985). Example if the oral information is about certain riot which
participated by low class social group independent interviewee is from upper
social context he will explain it in negative way. Political context will be
affect the oral information the same way as social.
cross-checkoral information with
other sources, This process at determining the
accuracy of (something) by checking it with various sources.
Oral information should be ross-checked
with other traditions, . It is not an easy job (using oral traditions as a
historical source but with patience and care and the ability to transcend his
own cultural and educational biases, the historian in Africa can make good use
of oral traditions a comparison of oral and other information from other source
.Mercier,L(1992) says to cross-check the source with other sources
and may be done on the corresponding subject and/or a similar period.
Especially in cross-checking the researcher should be aware of any bias that
may be present in the sources. If documented and oral evidence contradict each
other, the researcher should dig even deeper to determine their accuracy. If
the pattern of evidence is consistent and drawn from more than one viewpoint,
the historical account or interpretation becomes credible
If contradiction between two sets
of information take one of them based on your own reasoning,The
oral information is the product of human memory.Mercier,L(1992) says the suman
memory differ which cause people to view the Same event in different way. In oral
information there is a capability of having different information . Information
may come from people who come from. Different social class and political
contest. When such situation occurred
researcher is free to choose any taking
into consideration the information which appear immediately in the written
source
Use information which coming from
focus group,it involves gathering people from
similar backgrounds or experiences together to discuss a specific topic of
interest, beliefs. In focus group discussion participants are free to talk with
other group members; It generally involves group interviewing in which a small
group of usually 8 to 12 people(Thompson, P. 1988). However to use focus
group discussion require researcher to have different skills such as: to be
flexible and free of biasness and prejudices. A good understanding of the
subject, problem, or topic to be investigated. This includes both theoretical
knowledge and practical experience. Proficiency in the language in which
discussions will be conducted. Focus group discussion cannot be conducted
through an interpreter or by third person, no matter what types of skills
he/she has.
Avoid generalization.is defined as a broad statement or
an idea that is applied to a group of people or things. Often, generalizations
are not entirely true, because there are usually examples of individuals or
situations wherein the generalization does not apply. In this respect,
generalizations can be similar to stereotypes in that they are sometimes wrong.
It is important to consider views and contribution of every individual.
Generalization become problem if a person come from same group but with
different opinion
To Compare different oral account
to look for agreement and disagreement,To examine how expressions of
agreement and disagreement during evaluation deliberation affect participants'
evaluations of their experience. This agreement and disagreement are help
researcher Hence the agreement between the sources can only be due to the fact
that such events really took place or such situations existed(Vansina,
J1985).. Agreement and disagreement may be
in term of chronological order of the work and places also validity of
information. Ta handle this matter is become simple when the researcher had
already conducted focus group discussion
Conclusion
Oral
information is the information which
handed down by word of mouth through narration. Always narrate is the
experienced person like areas which experienced certain historical events like
flood, hunger, war or political event.
According to Yow, R(1994)other
people who trusted when providing oral information are elders who believed to
witness the remote events. Oral information is given down through narration,
songs, poems, formulae, epic poem and interview. Oral information provided by
person who affected by culture, environment, political ideology, religion
believes and so on which forced historian to use various roles to evaluate
findings
References
Mercier,L(1992).. Using Oral History in Community History Projects. Los Angeles: Oral History Association, Pamphlet No. 4,
Thompson, P. (1988) Oral History: The Voice of the Past. Revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press,.
Vansina, J(1985), Oral Tradition as History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,.
Yow, R(1994). Recording Oral History: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.,
Comments
Post a Comment