Function/ role of university education institutions
INTRODUCTION
Education
is the transmission of the cultural heritage of any society. It emphasizes
inculcation of the right knowledge, skills, values and attitudes to the younger
generation of a society. Each society sends her children to school to be
trained to become functional members of the society at graduation. Therefore,
education serves the needs of individuals and those of the society (Fafunwa,
1971).
Education
is an instrument par excellence for effecting national development. Nigeria's
philosophy of education is embedded in the knowledge that education is an
instrument for national development. The formulation of ideas, their
integration for national development and the interaction of persons and ideas
are all aspects of education (FRN, 2004).
Education is the process of giving
systematic instruction especially at school and skills and universities.(
Oxford dictionary,2009).
Education is what generation gives to
its younger ones which make them to develop altitudes other behavior which are
positive value to the society which they live.( Fatunwa,1974).
Generally;
Education is the continuous process by which desirable knowledge skills and
altitude are acquired and developed. Through education we achieve social
competence and individual growth.
Function/
role of university education institutions
According
to Nico Cloet,(1993). The University must become a primary tool for Africa’s
development in the new Century. Universities can help develop African
expertise; they can enhance the analysis of African problems; strengthen
domestic institutions; serve as a model environment for the practice of good governance,
conflict resolution and respect for human rights, and enable African academics
to play an active part in the global community of scholars.
Trends
are general directions of events, prevailing tendencies, and current directions
of events, developments and challenges (Offorma, 2010).
When
applied to our discussion, it means prevalent situations of education in
Africa.Since 1980, many sub-Saharan African countries have established
government funded, but also semiautonomous, higher education regulatory
agencies to help governments in the establishment, management, and supervising
of higher education institutions. These agencies ensure that citizens receive
quality higher education and institutions of higher learning help to generate
new knowledge for the improvement of higher education, innovation systems, and
economic development. Experience has shown that these agencies have minimized
direct government micromanagement by acting as midway bodies between the state
and the various higher education institutions of higher learning (Offorma,
2010).
MAINTENANCE
OF QUALITY
Most
sub-Saharan African English-speaking countries have delegated the
responsibility of the maintenance of quality higher education in institutions
of higher learning to these agencies. Current quality assurance mechanisms in
most African countries have two major components: an external regulatory
component based on a government-funded, but autonomous regulatory agency, and
an institutional component within each university. The two components work
together but the agency is the senior partner. The external (regulatory agency)
sets and enforces uniform benchmarks for all university institutions. The
internal unit, usually a quality-assurance office within the university, makes
sure that the benchmarks are implemented. Benchmarks designed by, and specific
to a given institution itself, could also be implemented within that
institution (World Bank 2011).
THE
EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL COMPONENT
The
regulatory frameworks at the external national levels are enforced by
regulatory agencies which oversee the following areas: institutional
accreditation, accreditation of individual programs, merit-based admissions
into higher education institutions, credit accumulation and transfer, the
quality of teaching staff; examination regulations, standardization of academic
awards, research and publications, infrastructure of institutions, education
facilities, and regulating cross-border higher education. Regulatory agencies
realize that the maintenance of quality is best done by the institution itself.
Thus, institutions are asked to have an administrative unit to oversee quality
in all the divisions of university institutions. Universities are asked to
carry out institutional audits on a regular schedule of about 3–5 years in east
and southern Africa to assess performance. These internal audits include
looking at the following areas: the general audits, institutional governance,
the quality of teaching and learning, the quality of the academic staff,
sufficiency of education facilities, research and publications, the quality of
outputs, financial management, relations with the surrounding community, and
other pertinent items.
Regulatory
agencies, in cooperation with institutions, are supposed to carry out an
external institutional audit after an institution has completed the internal
one. The aim of the external audit is to fill any quality gaps identified by
the internal audit. Unfortunately, many regulatory agencies have not fulfilled
their responsibilities of conducting external institutional audits.
ACCREDITATION
OF INSTITUTIONS AND PROGRAMS
Regulatory
agencies have helped governments in the process of establishing universities.
They have done this through a process known as institutional accreditation.
Institutional accreditation—permitting institutions to exist and deliver higher
education—is a tool of quality assurance and therefore relevant to higher
education support. It is a rigorous but necessary exercise and covers all
aspects of institutions ranging from land, staffing, educational facilities,
governance, infrastructure, and the financial health of institutions. All programs taught in universities in most
of sub-Saharan Africa are accredited (or approved) by regulatory agencies. In a
number of countries, agencies inspect the infrastructure and facilities, in
which the programs will be taught, before accrediting a program. In others, the
write-up of the program is considered sufficient. Regulatory agencies ensure
that programs meet minimum requirements, are written in acceptable formats, and
allow the students to get value for money.
INSTRUCTIONAL
AUTONOMY AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM
Most
universities decide that they should have the freedom to manage the governance
of their institutions, without interference by external powers including the
owners of the university to hire and discharge staff, to design and teach
academic programs, to admit students and discontinue them for good cause, to
design and manage their budgets without interference by the owners of the
university, to source for funds from anywhere possible, to make statutes and
regulations that govern the activities of the university, and to be assured of
protection based on a legal framework in the form of statutes or acts of
parliament. Academic freedom on the other hand is the individual freedom of
university workers: to teach; do research; speak and publish without
interference; penalty or intimidation from internal or external authorities. Many
leaders of regulatory agencies accept all the above aspirations but see
themselves as guardians of young institutions that need nurturing to maturity.
Further, they also realize that there are many rogue institutions that should
not be allowed to deliver inferior higher education.
INTERVENTION
BY AGENCIES WILL PROBABLY SHRINK
It
is hoped that areas of intervention into universities by regulatory agencies
will gradually shrink, as African universities develop capacity to deliver
quality education. Until the many universities in sub-Saharan Africa deliver
good quality higher education, regulatory agencies will remain relevant to
steer the latter through the various storms of growth. This task is particularly
vital, as many of the private institutions that have expanded in sub-Saharan
Africa lack capacity to improve higher education. Many of them lack academic
traditions, staff, infrastructure, research capacity, and what it takes to be a
“universal” institution. Many are teaching institutions, their infrastructure meager
and financial bases very poor. They still need the guidance of their founders
and the state represented by regulatory agencies to mature. When they become world
class university institutions, the work of regulatory agencies should narrow
depending on the political dimensions within each state.
CONCLUTION
Therefore,
university education trend increase research outputs through partnerships and
regional collaborations, and allow/facilitate universities to emerge as knowledge
centers of excellence , improve equitable access to higher education across
socio-economic quintiles and across gender, improve the movement of staff and
students across Africa including through a continental ‘accreditation standards
and credit transfer system’ to allow students and staff to switch between
universities and widen their exposure, establish an ‘African university ranking
system’ that recognizes the specific need for
Higher Education in Agriculture and other fields, that would encourage
universities to address those needs, Catalyzing change at Universities in Africa to secure quality training at both
under-and postgraduate levels this implies designing and implementing relevant
and quality research and outreach programmes that justify relevancy of higher
education in socio-economic development.
REFFERENCES
Fafunwa, .B.A. (1971).
New Perspectives in African Education. Lagos: Macmillan & Co.
Offorma, G,C, (2010).
Girl-child Education in Africa.: Catholic Institute for Development. Enugu
Federal Republic of
Nigeria (2004). National policy on education.: NERDC. Lagos.
UNESCO (2000-2010).
Trends and achievements in girls' education
and best practices for promotion of girls' education in Africa.:MDG
publihers
World Bank (2011). Secondary
education.http://web.worldbank.org
Nico Cloete,(1993) The
University System Engine of Development in the New World Economy: MDG publiher
Comments
Post a Comment