PRINCIPLES AND APPROACHES TO NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES AND APPROACHES TO NATURAL RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT
Overview
Environmental resources (natural resources) are the
materials that occur naturally in the environment and
they have use
value naturally or
after being subject
to certain degree modification or process.
They are sources
of raw materials used
by the society (McKinney and
Schoch, 1996).
On the other hand Waugh (1995) defined natural
resources as features which are needed and used by people. Literally the term
resources is synonymous to natural
resources, some individuals
broaden the meaning
to even accommodate human
resources.
These materials include all types of matter and
energy that are used to build and run society such as soil, minerals, water,
coal and all other naturally occurring materials. Materials that have been located
and can
profitably be extracted
at the present
market price form
a subset of
natural resource termed Reserves.
The resources are exploitable under current economic and technological
conditions. The materials that have been located but cannot be extracted
profitably at the present time are simply called resources which are as good as
undiscovered raw materials.
These are tangible and non- tangible elements of the
bio-physical environment necessary for the production of certain basic commodities
or necessary for the livelihoods of human beings. They consist of all things
that do not fall under man- made creations, thus what we see around us that
take the course without the interventions of human beings is what would account
as natural resources. A natural resource should be of a good quality and able
to be transformed into values that satisfy human needs.
They include the components of the Mother Nature
like: Land / Soil, Water, Air, Minerals/ Precious Stones, Forests / Vegetation,
Wildlife/ Animals.
Natural resources are also considered as commodities
which are valuable and they occur in nature and can be used to create wealth.
Therefore; a commodity becomes a natural
resource when a primary activity associated with it is extraction or
purification.
Resources
Refer to all means of satisfying human needs at a
given time and place. Resources include; Air, Land, Water, Minerals, Forests,
Wildlife, Living things including human beings, Non-living things etc. Are
means of attaining individual or social welfare and they vary over time and
space. They are the attribute of the environment appraised by man to have value
within the social and economic constraints.
How does a resource become a resource?
Elements of the environment become resources when
human beings appraise them to have values and these values depend on :-
·
Human needs and desires
·
Socio - Cultural
·
Economic
Conditions
· Political
·
Biological
This means that, to make an element of the
environment to be a resource, man has to employ his/ her technological and
organizational abilities. His / her actions to make the elements of the
environment to be resources will be constrained by:-
v
Ecological resistances- which demand that a harmonious equilibrium
should be maintained when exploiting the resources available in the
environment. This means that, whenever you utilize resources, you must not
deplete them; therefore, there is a need to balance between exploitation and
regeneration/reproduction of natural resources.
Exploitation of non- renewable resources should
consider the developmental aspect of the country and its exploitation should be
in a way that is friendly to the environmental ecosystems. The renewable
resources must be utilized without damaging their capacity to regenerate
themselves.
The decision to use a resource and the rate of
resource exploitation depends on the Supply and Demand.
Resources Exploitation Rate
Quantity of Resources/Units
S
D
Equilibrium
CATEGORIES OF NATURAL RESOURCES
- Natural resources are
generally classified into three categories (this is according to abundance and
availability)
i.
Continuous natural resources
ii.
Renewable natural resources
iii. Non-
renewable natural resources
i.
Continuous Natural Resources
These are resources which continue to be available
and cannot be degraded even with gross mismanagement. Example: Wind, Gravity,
Geo- thermal energy (heat energy from ground water circulating beneath the
earth’s crust).
Note: Solar energy: belongs in this group though its
reception can be affected by atmospheric pollution.
ii.
Renewable Natural Resources
These are resources that can be replaced within few
humans generation. These resources have ability to replenish themselves after
use. These are resources which are
capable of natural regeneration into useful condition within a time span. These
resources are potentially renewable and could be indefinitely available
provided that their capacity to regenerate is not damaged by natural
catastrophe or human beings.
Once these renewable resources are degraded beyond a
certain critical point, they may not recover thereby become non- renewable
resources.
Renewable resources are classified into:-
·
Living/biotic renewable resources such as ; Plants, Fish, Wildlife etc
· Non
living/abiotic renewable resources such as; Soils, Air etc
iii.
Non Renewable Resources / Stock resources
These are the resources that cannot replenish
themselves within a few human generations.
The phrase ‘few human generations’ here is very
essential because some resources are replaceable over a very long geologic time
scales. For example oil, soil, coal and
some
metallic
mineral deposits may
form again if
we wait for thousands
to hundreds of millions of years. However, these rates of
renewal are so many thousands of times slower than the rates of use that, for
all intents, they are nonrenewable on a human time scale.
These resources are available in finite/ limited
quantities or their rate of renewal is so slow that they may be regarded as
available in a fixed quantities. These resources once used are lost forever, as
they are not restored.
The concept of renewability is sometimes blurred.
Very old ground water in desserts may
take
centuries or even
many years to
replace themselves, while
ground water in
rainy tropical areas may
be replaced in
a few days.
Thus deep ground water in desserts is sometimes termed ‘fossil ground
water’ which is in a way non-renewable resource.
NOTE: The major concern of the earth as whole currently
is to switch from the use of non-renewable resources to use of more
environmental friendly renewable resources i.e
use of wind
energy as opposed
to fossil energy
which is so
unfriendly into the environment. Their use therefore pollute
environment. Since non-renewable resources
have time limit
in terms of
their use, prices
tend to fluctuate a great deal
and hence destabilizing many economic processes.
Note :- ANOTHER WAY OF CLASSIFYING THE NATURAL
RESOURCES
Natural resources can be classified according to
their :-
a.
Chemical Nature
i.
Inorganic resources:- Air, water, metallic minerals
ii.
Organic resources:- plants, animals, micro-organisms
iii.
Mixed resources:- soils
b. Abundance
and Availability
i.
Inexhaustible/Renewable
ii.
Exhaustible/Non renewable
iii.
Continuous
c.
Distribution
i.
National resources; Confined to national boundaries e.g. Minerals, land
(soil)
ii.
Multinational resources; Shared by more than one nation e.g. some
rivers, lakes, migratory animals.
iii.
International resource; Shared by all nations e.g. air, solar energy.
Another way of describing Natural Resources include:
a.Geological resources
These include –Minerals, Oils, Gas, Rocks
b.
Hydro-geological resources
Example; -Underground water, Surface water, Ice
c. Atmospheric resources
For example; -Air, Sunlight, Rainfall and its
pattern
d.
Edaphic resources
Example; -Soils, Vast biological wealth in the soil
(fertility)/elements /nutrients
e.
Forest resources
These are such as Vegetation/ plants and their
products
f. Marine and aquatic resources
Example; -Plants, animals, and minerals in marine areas.
g.Animal resources
For example; -Wild animals, Domesticated animals
h.
Microbial resources
-Different types of microbes (microscopic organisms)
(c) NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Natural resource management is a concept that encamp
wise use of natural resources i.e. use that does not compromise the quality of
the resources. Such a use ensures that yield and quality of resources in
question are not compromised in course of their use. When resources are used
caution should be taken not to degrade the same since some resources are non-elastic
(cannot replenish ones
exhausted), ones exhausted
they are gone. Resources should be well timed in terms
of conservation to avoid the risk of overuse and hence exhaustion which equal
to disappearance on human time scale.
Natural Resources management also refers to a
process of decision making whereby natural resources are allocated over space
and time to meet certain needs, desires or aspiration of man/ human being in
particular society. It is the process of decision making that involves the
exploitation of natural resources overtime and space in a particular society/
country with respect to needs and desires of the members of the country. This
is done within the frame work of man’s technological innovations, political and
social institutions, legal, administrative arrangements.
Each society / country has its own rules and
regulations which have to be observed during decision making for natural
resources management.
In our modern societies we have several policies and
legislations governing resources use.
Therefore, decision making for natural resources use
should abide to the policies and legislations of the society concerned.
- The exploitation of any resource depends on the
technological framework of the society or country.
For instance, many rural dwellers depend on fuel
wood as the source of energy, but with change in technology, they may adopt
other sources like electricity, use of stoves, and gases.
Example; In Kilimanjaro Rural Area, Kagera Rural Areas, Mbeya Rural
Areas etc
- Natural
resources management is considered as the New Observation/ approach:
Why Considered as New Observation?
1. It
emphasizes on Rationality in the utilization of natural resources.
i.e. - Utilizing while thinking on the future
- Ability to
reasons (logical thinking) for the sustainable use of the resources available,
rather than being governed solely by instinct and personal appetite/
preference.
2. It emphasizes on Ethics over economics when
utilizing the natural resources
- This means that we should not aim at making profit only, but the
quality of resources to be reserved for future use.
- Think of
the sustainable use of natural resources through abiding to the principle and
standards set (policies, laws) for N.R use.
3. It emphasizes
on Ecological conservation over Engineering activities
- We
have to use the resources within the ecological limitations posed by the
environment in a way that we do not deplete the available resources.
Ecology: study of the relationships between living
organisms and their interaction with the environment. The ecological aspect of
the environment should not be disturbed unnecessarily due to application of
science and technology in designing various infrastructures/ things unless
otherwise, example; Construction, use of machines etc.
4. It
emphasizes on involvement of strategies and Legislations or Acts to achieve
certain objectives for the betterment of all people in the society/ country.
The strategies, laws and acts are changing over time and place, therefore, NRM
is considered to be a new observation
5. Resources management emphasizes on the protection
of environmental quality and its enhancement (i.e. the natural resources
existing in the environment).
Therefore, the strategies designed aim at promoting
wise exploitation and restoration of resources (utilization and conservation).
We need to make serious attempts to use natural resources in an efficient
manner, or else they would be depleted as the result of careless use of the
Resources.
The seriousness of the problem can be understood
from the words of one of the American President (Theodore Roosevelt; 26th President in 1900’s) that:-
“…The conservation of natural resources is
fundamental problem, unless we solve that problem, it will avail / help us
little to solve all others…”
Resources value
Various
values are ascribed
to the resources
that occur in the environment.
The care given to any environmental resource is subjective to the value
that the resource users put on such a resource.
For example, huge trees and forests in some villages
in Tanzania are highly valued for their local religious functions they play.
The communities in which such trees or forests occur accord them maximum care.
The
values are drivers
of conservation because
these values force
the individuals to aspire for longevity of the resources concerned.
In most cases individuals refers to only economic
benefits when looking at the value of environmental resources. There are some
other values that are attached to environmental resources summing up to five.
Sometimes these are referred to as five E’s as explained below;
i. Ethical
value referred to as Intrinsic value
This is the value of resource unto itself,
regardless of its value to humans. This justifies existence of mountain
scenery, worm in the wastes etc. If these resources have a right of
existing,
then high intrinsic
value should be
ascribed to them.
Intrinsic values are environmental oriented. The rest of the E’s are referred to as
extrinsic values.
The extrinsic values are the ones which are external
to resources own right to exist, refer instead to the resource’s ability to
provide something for human beings. Such values are anthropocentric (human
centered). Extrinsic values are more utilitarian or practical, than intrinsic
values and therefore tend to be more widely discussed in political and economic
debates on resource management.
ii. Esthetic value (Aesthetic value)
This is the value of resource in making the world
more beautiful, more appealing to the senses and generally more pleasant. The
value one place on a mountain hike in the cool morning air is an example. Some
people place no value to this and would pay northing for it while others find
it indispensable.
iii. Emotional values
This is the value resource beyond sensory enjoyment.
Some people for example develop very strong emotional bonds to certain natural
areas or certain animal or plant species.
This is sometimes called sense of a ‘‘place’’. Many
psychologists consider nature to be important for mental health, especially
children.
iv. Economic value
This is type
of value involved
with tangible products
that can be
bought or sold.
For example food, timber, energy etc. Society needs to focus more on long term economic values,
which actually provide more income over the long run. The value of resources
for tourism, native fruits, or other sustainable products is ultimately
much greater than the value of their
destructive uses.
v.Environmental service values
This is the
value of resources
in providing intangible
services that allow
humans (and other life) to exist
on earth. Plants help to purify air, produce oxygen and plant roots and soil
microbes purify water.
Some people put all the five values on all
environmental resources. Others put different values on resources like beach
etc.
Logging, mining and other types of harvesting that
destroy the resources are called direct values. Most environmental problems
arise when the resources are appreciated for only their direct value. Placing
only ‘‘direct’’ short term economic value on natural resources artificially
‘‘discount’’ their true value to society and to the future generations.
Environmental service, emotional, esthetic and
ethical values are referred to us indirect
values,
meaning that they
are in ways
that do not
involve direct harvesting
or other destruction of the resources.
More sustainable uses of
resources, such as
extractive forestry and ecotourism,
will be encouraged
and rewarded. As long as
only short term
values
are considered, overuse
and exploitation will
be encouraged and
rewarded.
Incumbent in the resource utilization is sustainability. Thus most often environmental natural
resource managers tend to stress on sustainable utilization of resources. This
is as crucial to natural resources as it ensures longevity and persistent
quality for generations who depend on resource in question.
APPROACHES TO NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
- The process towards
natural resources management requires several approaches including:-
i. Economic approach
ii. Legal approach
iii. Institutional approach
iv. Administrative approach
v. Pedagogic approach
vi. Ecosystem approach
i.
Economic Approach
- This is one of the
approaches used in natural resources management and it is the most common among
others. It is all about the use of the following issues:
a)
Applying Taxation so as to reduce the use of such a resource; example
tax imposition to; charcoal making, fishing, small scale mining etc.
b)
The use of Polluter pays Principle (PPP)
- This requires one to pay
the real cost of pollution that he / she is causing to the environment due to
resources exploitation.
- The polluter pays
principle is the commonly accepted practice that those who produce pollution
should bear the costs of managing it to prevent damage to human health or the
environment.
Example: A factory that produces a potentially
poisonous substance as byproducts of its activities is usually held responsible
for its safe disposal.
c)
Applying user fees Principle
- This requires one to pay
the user fees that have been calculated and set according to the prevailing
standards.
- The user is required to
pay the fees for the use of a particular resource in a specified time. This
reduces high pressure over resources exploitation.
d)
Benefit sharing Principle
- This involves preventing
people from using some reserved areas like forests, national parks, game
reserves etc, and at the end of the day you share the benefits obtained from
such reservation.
e)
The use of Permit System
- This needs the user to
get the permit from the recognized institution/ ministry before using a certain
resource.
- This means that the
resources concerned are restricted towards a random use/ exploitation unless
the user gets the valid permit from the recognized authority.
f)
Conservation System
- This is all about
convincing people to do away with the use of a certain resource in a specified
time under the name of conservation for future benefits.
ii.
Administrative Approach
- This is all about the use of ministry/ ministries
and other organs in environmental resources protection and Natural resources
management.
For example: in Tanzania, this involves the use of
the Ministry of Environment which is in the office of the vice- President. It
also touches; Ministry of energy and minerals/natural resources, Ministry of
water and irrigation, ministry of livestock development and fisheries, National
environmental management council (NEMC) which established as an institution/
organ for environmental management in Tanzania, etc
- In this approach, therefore, there is the need to
establish the Ministry / ministries in which all environmental / natural
resources management issues are delt upon. Different organs can also be
established to facilitate the monitoring and implementation of environmental
guidelines and natural resources management.
iii.
Pedagogic approach
Pedagogy simply means the science or art of
teaching/ providing education using the specified methods/ procedures. It is
concerning with environmental education provision and environmental awareness
creation to the people.
- It entails the use of SEMINARS and WWORKSHOPS to
discuss the environmental resources management. Also through: Classroom
teaching/ curriculum, Conference, Public meetings etc
iv.
Legal Approach
- This is all about the use of LAWS and BY-LAWS to
guide natural resources use thereby conserving them (natural resources).
- It involves the use of Laws made and accepted to
guide the natural resources exploitation.
v.
Institutional Approach
- This is all about the natural resources management
regimes. It is about
v
Accessibility
v
Utilization
v
Ownership
-The Natural resources management regimes include;
a.
Common property
b.
Public / state property
c. Private property
d.
Open access property
vi. Ecosystem Approach
- It is also known as Ecological management it refer
to the holistic view of the environmental components and the inter-
relationships among them (components)
-It is one of the new ways/ approaches of managing
natural resources that takes into account the entire ecosystem (Ecosystem; A
community of living organisms; plants, animals, and microbes; in conjunction
with non living organisms interacting/linked to each other in the environment)
-It balances recreational use, economic development
and conservation of natural resources in a way that all the needs are met in a
sustainable manner.
-It integrates the scientific knowledge of
ecological relationships within a complex socio- economic and Political
frameworks towards the general goal of protecting the native ecosystems
integrate over the longtime.
-It is the integration of ecological, economic, and
social concerns towards the management of biological and physical systems in
order to safeguard the long term ecological sustainability, natural diversity
and production. i.e. It deals with 3
concerns namely:
a)
Ecological concerns
b)
Economic concerns
c) Social concerns
a.
Ecological Concerns
-Ecology refers to the relationship of the
environmental organism and their environment including human beings.
This means that when planning for the better natural
resources management so as to satisfy the
ecological concerns, these is a need to consider human beings,
environment and other Organisms
You have to take into account that an interaction of
several components within the bio- physical environment can tell much on the
management or sustainability of the mentioned components.
For example:
·
Interaction between human beings and the environment can lead to either
Positive or Negative impacts to the natural resources found in the environment.
Therefore, there is a need for scientific ecological
knowledge on the relationship human beings/ living organisms and the
environment before planning for natural resources management.
b.
Economic Concerns
This means that the production and management of
material wealth like farming, industry and other activities should balance with
the ecological overview/ aspect of the environment.
Simply, it means that “ the rate of economic
exploitation of resources, should balance with the natural resources available
in the environment”
c.
Social Concerns
This is all about the people living together in
communities, human history (lifestyles), population trends, past and future
activities (e.g. Agricultural trends), the Natural resources trends, conflicts
between NR. User’s tec.
Therefore, for better natural resources management
we look critically at the mentioned aspects of social concerns.
Both social and economic concerns are mostly not in favor of the
ecological concerns because: they degrade
the environment(economic activities and social / aspect)
They deplete the Natural resources (Renewable and
Non Renewable Resources).
The ecosystem approach requires the natural resource
management to be observed beyond the observable factors at the present time.
It is a more away from the approach of serving the
endangered species at the time when they are at brink of crisis to conservation
and management of ecosystems at all times.
PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Under this, we shall have a critical look at the
Ecological Principles of Natural Resources Management.
Ecological principles of NRM include all the
principles that are related to land use and the resources found on it (Land)
It is obvious that human activities have a great
impact on the environment and its resources and therefore, are the major source
of change of land and its resources. This change/transformation affects the
ecological and physical systems. Human activities have great impact on the
environment, therefore, are the major source of change of land. This
change/transformation affects the ecological systems and physical systems.
Human activities affects the earth’s efficiency to
provide the goods and services. In most cases the potential ecological
consequences are not taken into consideration when planning for natural
resources management.
In the use of resources, we usually have conflicting
consequences and goals; example; Mining and land, agriculture and forestry,
fishing and water quality/quantity of fish etc
Therefore, the critical challenge for land use and
resources management involves reconciling the conflicting uses and goals.
Ecological Principles are usually used in planning
for Natural resources management to meet the challenges for conflicting
land/resources use, hence reducing the conflicting consequences as the result
of land use and resources exploitation.
The ecological principles help us to understand the
limitations and potentials offered by the environment hence proper planning for
natural resources management.
Therefore, the ecological Principles of Natural
Resources Management include:
i) The Landscape Principle
ii) Species
principle
iii) Time Principle
iv) Place Principle
v) Disturbance
Principle
I. THE LANDSCAPE PRINCIPLE
A landscape; Is a broad area of land with different
types of landforms, life forms, and all manner of things with regards to human
activities.
In planning for natural resources management by
using the landscape principle we should consider the land size, shape, quantity
of resources, and spatial relationship of the land cover types.
Usually, the size, shape, and spatial relationship
of the land cover types influence the dynamic of populations, communities and
ecosystems. The kind of organisms that can exist in a particular area are
limited by shape, size, and habitats across the landscape.
For the case of living organisms/resources, we are
urged to consider their population trend, i.e.
o
Population Increase – Immigration and Natality
o
Population Decrease – Emigration and Mortality
Natality
Immigration
Increase
Species Population
Mortality
Emigration
Decrease
A small area usually have less species compared to
the large area. Human beings are also found within the landscape; their
activities may fragment or even change the cover of the land. That is to say,
they have both negative and positive impacts on the landscape.
Example; When
the landscape is fragmented to have small patches, this may reduce or eliminate the population of organisms. Also
may alter the ecosystem process (especially through clearing of Buffer zones,
and Corridors.
Landscape fragmentation may result to positive
effects; it may result to the increase in diversity of species in a particular
area; For instance; Introduction of new species within an area i.e. edge
effect.
With an edge effect, you may have organisms that
prefer the disturbed area; these organisms may flow to the disturbed area
thereby causing the increase of biodiversity to such area.
The large landscapes generally contain more species
compared to the small ones. The better management, therefore, should include
large patches; hence the larger the area the better the management.
II. DISTURBANCE PRINCIPLE
There are manmade and natural disturbances. The
type, duration, and intensity of disturbance shaped the characteristics of the
populations, communities, and ecosystem.
Whatever disturbances that occur, on the area may
affect the community / they may lead to the following:
a.
Changing the number and kinds of species.
b. Causing the losses of
organic matter
c. Affecting the productivity of the
land positively or negatively
d.
Affecting the habitat structure
- Land use after the
natural environment regimes and may initiate new disturbances like soil/ land
degradation/ erosion etc.
Adjacent land use affects natural areas and the
effects may be through the introduction of non- native land species that may
also affect the resources in the environment.
The non- native land species may be exhaustive in
nature and can dominate the area and lead to extinction of other native
species.
Example: In Lake Victoria
*Introduction of spices to fight the hyacinths.
* Introduction of Nile perch.
We can usually minimize the man-made disturbances,
but in most cases natural disturbances cannot be avoided.
E.g. storms, floods, volcanic eruptions, earth
quakes etc.
The ecosystems can just adjust themselves wherever
such disturbances occur; therefore whatever action taken to the natural
disturbances should aim at preventing the impact ( adaption
in the impacts).
III.
SPECIES PRINCIPLE
This principle emphasis on species diversity and
focal species in the whole process of managing the resources.
Focal species are those that provide indication on
how the resources can be managed.
*species diversity
The general consideration is put towards the number
kinds of species in a particular area.
The land with more species is more productive than
that with few species. This means that whatever the disturbances will take
place/ occur; in the area with many species, not all species will die/ migrate;
some will survive.
Therefore, if you want to conserve the land /
environment you need to maintain many but considerate species.
Most of the human activities lower the number of
environmental species/ resources diversity, therefore, there is a need to
diversify the species within the environment.
Note: species principle implies that: in planning
for management and use of resources we need to look at the number and kinds of
species (diversity), and the indications provided by the focal species around
the area.
Principle (man and most important)
Facial species:
The species that can provide the indication on how
the resources can be managed
Keystone species (umbrella and link species
The species (plants or animals) that play a unique
or crucial role in the way the ecosystem functions.
They include:
·
Indicators
·
Ecological engineers
Indicators
Provide the management indication
Tell the status of other resources E.g. Mangrove
plants- wet area
Can be used/ managed for water related activities
e.g. irrigation, fishing etc
Ecological engineers
These include small animals which could alter the
ecological habitats thereby modify the opportunities for other species. E.g.
rodents; termites etc
IV.
TIME PRINCIPLE
When planning for the management and use of
resources in the environment we need to consider diverse time scales for which ecosystems
pass through.
Usually resources/ ecosystem change with time, ie
·
Seasonal changes
·
Year to year changes
·
Succesional changes (plant succession - the way plants come up)
Human activities may have a great role in altering
the ecosystems / resources with regards to time.
When you look at a particular ecosystem in terms of
species composition, structure and the state, is always the function of the
events that took place in the past (overtime)
What you see may not necessarily reveal/ show the
prevailing conditions, but they may be prevailing conditions.
Some events may take place today but their effects
may be seen much later.
For instance; the impacts due to random land use may
be experienced after a longtime hence, the current land uses impact influence
the future land uses.
V.
THE PLACE PRINCIPLE
Normally any area or location has its own local
environment.
The local environment is the result of the variation
of several factors like:
o Soils
o
Climate
o
Hydrology
o Biotic
interactions etc
o
Living organisms
The local environment influence the ecological
processes, abundance and distribution of species in a particular area.
Usually the local environmental conditions lead to
the natural occurrence of specific ecosystems structure; only those species
which are adapted to the environmental constraints will strive / fight to stay
in that particular area.
Therefore: the unique conditions of a place may be
more important for conservation/ management. Area with endemic species (species
found within a particular area) are always unique and they need to be
conserved.
The land use which can’t be maintained within the
constraints of the environment should be avoided because it can lead to the
degradation of the environment.
Conclusion:
Generally the ecological principles of NRM provide
the basic for specifying and understanding of the ecological concerns for
ecosystem use. They are the checklists for decision making in the whole process
of natural resources management.
Resources Utilization
Resource utilization needs to be addressed
thoroughly because even ubiquitous resources may quickly go extinct if misused.
Uncontrolled use of natural resource may result into wastage of
the same resource
and the population
that depends on
it may easily
fall in scarcity of
resources. Key issue
that is worth
to note and
that needs consideration
in resource utilization is increase in longevity of resource use. The
resource should be used for the longest
time possible without
compromising its quality
i.e sustainable resource use.
Sustainable Resource Utilization
Sustainable resource utilization means resource use
process that bears within it elements of perpetual aspects of
the same resources.
Some impacts that
emanate from resource misuse are
permanent with far
reaching fatal impacts.
With sustainable resource utilization the
resource use by
the present generation
should not deny
the right for
the future generation to use the same resources. Hence sustainable
resource utilization means utilization of resources rationally on the basis
that they can support the present and future generations.
The major aim of sustainable resource utilization is
to attain sustainable development in which
resources are used
in solving the
current problems without
jeopardizing the possibility for
the future generation
to exist. In other words sustainable utilization of resources
is the utilization
of resources while
observing resource management
and conservation principles for the resources to last longer.
The basic resources of the world that are likely to
subject the earth into crisis unless they are
used with great
care are water,
air, forests, minerals,
agricultural land, special ecosystems and tourism resources.
Below is a description of how some of these resources can be used to ensure
longevity and maintain yield.
(i) Water resources
Water
must be considered
in terms of
quality, quantity and
accessibility. For instance
lakes,
rivers, swamps, underground
waters are necessary
to support population
and economic development of
the people. The
critical shortage of
water inhibits economic development and directly damage people
as diseases may erupt. Major economic
sectors like transport, agriculture and industries depend on water at one point
for proper function.
Sustainable utilization of water involves channeling
and absorbing excess water, efficient
distribution
of the available
water, avoiding disposing
wastes in water
bodies that
interfere
with water quality,
avoid cultivation along
river banks and
at river sources.
Water reservoirs should be constructed to tap rain
water to avoid risk of shortage during dry period.
(ii) Minerals like iron ores
Minerals
like copper, tin,
mica; diamond, gold
etc. have greater contribution
towards
economic
development hence these
nonrenewable resources need
to be managed
properly. When managed properly mines will yield
economic products for a long time.
Governments
and companies involved
in mining activities
should have proper
environmental
rehabilitation projects, like
revetment of the
soil, planting of
trees,
enacting
laws and regulations
to reinforce mining
companies to rehabilitate
land when
mining activities ceases in a particular place.
(iii) Forests
Forests should be used with conservation mind
because careless use of trees may lead to
their
disappearance. There should
be proper reforestation
programs to ensure
that
deforested
areas are rehabilitated. Only
mature trees should
be harvested. Alternative
sources of energy should be sought to relieve
forests of the pressure pressed to it by both
rural and urban population.
(iv) Land
When land is used especially in agriculture, care
should be taken to maintain nutrients in
it. When nutrient
in the soil
decrease, proper fertilization
preferably by using
organic
fertilizers should be done. Cultivation in areas
which are prone to soil erosion should be
properly
done by using
contours. Proper agronomic
practices should be
adhered to in
order to avoid land degradation in course of
agricultural activities. Rotational cropping is
one of good agricultural practices that ensure
safety to agricultural land.
(v) Air
Air is the
resource that is
available everywhere on earth.
Misuse of atmosphere
by
dumping
in it undesirable
gases, has led
to major environmental
problems facing the
world today. The problems range from global warming,
acid rain to depletion of ozone
layer.
There should be
deliberate efforts to
ensure discharge of harmful
gases such as
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) into the atmosphere.
Rational utilization of resources for economic
purposes will ensure continuous use of the
same resource for a long time. On the other hand
a wasteful use of resources will result
into ill-impacts which will come back to community
and harm it, soon or later.
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND STRATEGIES
RESOURCES DEGRADATION AND DEPLETION
Natural resource depletion is the sum of net forest
depletion, energy depletion, and mineral depletion.
Net forest depletion is the unit resource rents
times the excess of round wood harvest over natural growth.
Energy depletion is the ratio of the value of the
stock of energy resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25
years). It covers coal, crude oil, and natural gas.
Mineral depletion is the ratio of the value of the
stock of mineral resources to the remaining reserve lifetime (capped at 25
years). It covers tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite,
and phosphat (World Bank, 2011) .
(Source: World Bank "The Changing Wealth of
Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium" 2011)
Resource Depletion
The pressure on the environment due to human
activities has been greatly enhanced due to the
accelerated use and
depletion of natural
resources. Given the finite nature
of all resources the ultimate aim
is to achieve sustainable use of the natural capital. When the
rates at which
certain resources are
used exceed their
ability to renew
(replenish) themselves these resources
are at risk
of exhaustion. This is
simply termed resource depletion as it is further explained
below. Principally there two basic inputs from the environment, namely matter
and energy
Depletion of Matter
Matter resources
are depleted by
being ‘‘lost’’ or
dispersed. Ore deposits are
usually
concentrated
deposits of minerals
that are normally found in
dilute form in
the earth’s crust. When the
minerals are mined and processed metals are obtained they can be used to make
cars and
other refined products.
The atoms contained
in the minerals
may be
dispersed
i.e wearing and
tearing of the
materials or lost
to further human
use when wastes are disposed in
landfills and elsewhere, theurban ore of a landfill may later be mined for its
metal contents. Similarly rapid soil erosion depletes the soil not because the
nutrients
and minerals in
the soil are
destroyed, but because
the soil is
dispersed, ultimately into the oceans.
These
are examples of
nonrenewable matter; when
dispersed, molecules of
metals and soils will stay
dispersed unless much energy and money is used to concentrate them. In terms of
renewable matter resources, dispersion still occurs such as when houses are
built out of timber relatively quickly. The renewable resources are Oftenly
biological resources that can be re-grown.
Depletion of Energy Resources
Energy has a one-way flow through society because it
is transformed to unusable form ‘‘waste heat’’ when used.
Energy resources are
therefore depleted when
they are transformed this way.
This is a key difference fromsome forms of ‘‘lost’’ matter, which
could be recollected
and reconcentrated if
cheap energy is
available. In contrast
ones
energy
is transformed, it
is lost forever;
waste heat can
never be reconcentrated. For example when coal or oil is burnt to
release their chemical energy to drive
engine that energy can never be reused.
It is because of the one way flow of energy that
always an alternative form environmental
friendly
energy which is
ubiquitous is recommended
and that is
sun. This source
of renewable energy could potentially keep the societyrunning for many
millions of years.
Examples
of sun’s energy
include direct solar
power, biomass, hydropower
and wind power.
Bubble Pattern of Resource depletion
Unsustainable
use of many
resources exhibits a
bubble pattern of
depletion. The best
known
example is the
so called Hubbert’s
Bubble of oil
depletion. King Hubbert predicted accurately
the bubble patterns
of oil depletion
in the United
States. The assumptions were
made in 1950s
and have proven
to be strikingly
accurate. U.S oil production peaked in 1970 and has been
declining since the richest reserves are steadily depleted.
The bubble pattern has two causes: exponential exploitation and exponential
depletion. Because both use and exhaustion are exponential, they tend to make
mirror image. The exploitation,
side of the
bubble is exponential
because resources are
exploited very quickly once society
discovers their utility. The underlying cause of this exponential use is the
exponential growth of human populations and
technology that uses the resources.
All
resources on the
earth are finite,
limits to growth
eventually occur, and
demand exceeds supply. At this stage, society usually tends to intensify
its efforts to obtain more of the resources
through further exploration
and increased technological
applications. However these efforts
soon usually encounter
what is termed
Law of Diminishing
Return,
in economics, meaning
that increasing efforts
to extract resource
produce progressively
smaller amounts/returns. This
results into depletion side
of the bubble. Production declines exponentially
because the most easily extracted concentrations of the resource become
exhausted.
As supply of the resource decline, prices rise
sometimes leading to unemployment and other
unpleasant changes. Historically
the society responds
to the increase
in resource prices by switching
to another resource. England switched from wood to coal as energy, when forests
were decimated and more recently to oil because it is cheaper. The series of
bubbles shown in England has often been repeated elsewhere and with other
resources as societies have tended to switch from one unsustainable resource to
another. The only way to break this ‘‘cycle of Unsustainable use’’ is to switch
to sustainable uses.
What is Environment?
The word environment commands a very broad meaning.
It includes air, land, water, and plant, animal life including human life
together with the social, economic, recreational and cultural factors that
influence the lives of human beings.
It also includes the building structures, machines
or other devices made by man, any solids, liquids, gases, heat, sound,
vibration or radiation resulting directly or indirectly from the activities of
man and any part or combination of the fore-going and the inter- relationship
between man and the mother nature.
Over the past hundred years, the terrestrial fresh
water and marine environment have been declining.
Environmental degradation and resources depletion
have escalated/ increased over the past three decades due to the cumulative
impacts of rapid population growth, intensive agriculture, urbanization,
industrialization etc.
·
Deforestation
·
Decline of biodiversity and marine resources
·
Water scarcity – especially clean safe water
· Air
pollution
·
Urbanization etc
The major reason for the adverse/ unfavorable
environmental problems in Africa is POVERTY. (What is the relationship between
poverty and environment?) Poverty-
environmental nexus.
However the main cause of many environmental problems include:
· Persistent
economic sector
·
Agricultural activities
· Industrial
activities
· Mining
activities etc
· Population
increase
· Constructional activities
It is also due to other sectoral policies which
largely neglect and fail to avoid harmful impacts on the environment and
natural resources base.
Generally, we can summarize the causes of
environmental/ land degradation by using the DISASTER CRUNCH MODEL- developed
by Blackie at all 1994, although these are some modifications.
i.e.
Underlying cause’s -Poverty
-Population increase
-Poor
governance
-Ignorance
-Technological stagnation
Immediate cause (lack of) -Lack of income
-Lack of literates society
-Lack of democracy
-Lack of technology
-Lack of peace
Unsafe conditions -Deforestation
-Poor agricultural practices
-Civil wars
-Corruption etc
Land degradation As a disaster
THE KEY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS / CHALLENGES IN
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
1.
Increased Food Insecurity
- This is as result of
rapid population growth degradation of arable land and mismanagement of
available water sources combined with poor economic policies to support food
production.
- Due to such factors and other
related ones, there have been the high rate of decreasing of sufficient and
good quality of food needed to support the available number of population.
- The population growth has
acted as the major cause of increased food insecurity; and there have been a tremendous increase of
population especially in developing countries.
For example:
·
In 1650 year; - 550 million This is a double increase
within 200years
·
In 1850 year – 1100million
·
1850 year – 1100 million This is five times
within 159 years
·
2009 year – 6790 million
If you look at the concept of doubling time, there
have been a decrease of years for (D.T)
e.g. 1930 – 2000million = 45 years
1975- 4000million= 35 years
2.
Deforestation
Cutting down of trees/ vegetation cover for various
uses
-
African forests are shrinking
-
Most of the people use firewood as the energy source
-
Also, most of people’s livelihood depends on forests as well as land,
leading to the increased deforestation.
Generally it is one the environmental challenges in
Tanzania and developing countries at large.
E.g. -In Tanzania; about 10,000 ha. Of closed
forests were being deforested annually between 1981 to 1985.
3.
Biodiversity Depletion
The richness of African bio- diversity requires
great protection and a sustainable use
that will ensure the income of those who depend upon such bio-
diversity.
Therefore, there is a need to maximize bio diversity
landscape protection. We need to give priority to biodiversity areas which are
close to areas with high population density and to give balanced attention to
such regions as arid and semi- arid.
4.
Water Scarcity
African’s fresh water problems are acute and
worsening. It is one of the major stresses that face the human livelihoods.
Most of them arise from the poor management of water
resources and sources, lack of financial resources required for sustainable
development and efficient utilization of resources, absent of effective
regional and basin development plans and shared management, and underestimation
of the ground water potential to supplement irrigation and drinking water
supplies.
Water scarcity: a condition in which the annual
availability of fresh water is 1000 or less cubic meters per person.
IUCN (International union for conservation of
natural) over 350 million people suffer from water scarcity.
5.
Coastal and Marine Resources Depletion.
There have been a very high pressure towards the
coastal areas encroachment and use of marine resources in Lakes, oceans, seas
E.g. they include: mangroves, coral reefs, lagoons,
coastal forests, fish stocks, sea cucumbers (overrate ) no back born –long.
Degradation of coastal and marine resources have
been caused by increased population/ urbanization and over exploitation of
resources coupled with mismanagement.
There is an urgent need for integrated coastal zone
management to combat the problem.
6. Air
Pollution
Has now emerged as an environmental issue of
concerns in most of major cities in Africa including Tanzania.
-
Regulatory measures and environmental standards need to be introduced to
combat the problem.
Africans emissions of GHG- Green house gases remain
modest compared to developed countries, despite the factor that it is modest,
be regulated.
Globally, there have been an increasing rate of
CO2 emissions into the air/ atmosphere.
E.g. 1900=280 ppm (Parts per Million).
1980=335 ppm
700= 380 ppm
The projection indicates that up to the year 2050
there will be about 400 ppm
About 90% of GHG emission is caused by the developed
countries. The studies show that china and India also contribute a lot towards
GHG emission.
E.g. china = 22%
Russia =5.24%
Canada = 1.90%
USA= 19.91%
Japan = 4.28%
UK = 1.84%
India = 5.50%
Germany = 2.69%
South Korea 1.72%
Source: UN, 2008
7.
Urbanization
The African urbanization rate is the highest in the
world. This is resulting in urban environmental deterioration.
Most of the environmental problems in urban areas
are inevitable consequences of urbanization (pollution, slums, eruption of
diseases etc).
They can be resolved through efficient and effective
urban management systems.
People have been moving in a very high rate from
rural to urban areas (rural- urban
migration). This has been caused by “push” factors working in rural areas. (ie
insecurity, poor health facilities, poor transport and comm., lack of
electricity etc)
Beside the push factors of rural areas, there are,
of course, the “pull” factors (working in urban areas): like the glamour of big cities, good look –
physical
Higher pay urban jobs etc
There is a challenge high population growth in urban
cities- in developing countries E.g.
Dsm: 1960 = 0.15 %
1981 = 0.9
%
2000 = 4.6 %
Nairobi : 1950 = 0.14%
1979 = 0.83%
2000 = 5.3%
The proportion of people living in urban areas in
DCS’s is increasing from now and then;
E.g. 1950=17%; 1985=31%; 2000 = 39%
1950
1955
2000
Africa
15%
29%
39%
Latin America
41%
69%
76%
ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS/ CHALLENGES IN TANZANIA
Tanzania is one of the developing countries of the
word, and we have already discussed in details the key environmental problems
in the developing countries.
In summary the following are major six environmental
problems in Tanzania (mostly in found rural and urban areas)
(a) Land
degradation
(b) Lack of
accessible good quality water
(c)
Environmental pollution
(d) Loss of wildlife habitats and biodiversity
(e)
Deforestation
All these are threatening the availability of
natural resources found in the environment, hence the need of natural resources
management.
It has been analyzed that;
(a) Land
degradation has contributed to the reduced productivity of soils in many parts
of Tanzania.
(b) Despite
considerable national efforts, over half of the people in towns and in the
country side do not have access to good quality water for washing, cooking,
drinking and bathing.
(c)
Pollution in towns and country side is affecting the health of many
people, and has lowered the productivity of the environment.
(d) The loss
habitats for wildlife is threatening the national heritage and creating an
uncertain future for economic development.
(e) The
productivity of Lake, river, coastal, and marine waters is threatened by
pollution and poor management.
(f)
Tanzania forest and woodland
heritage is being reduced year by year through clearance for
agriculture, wood fuel, and for other demands.
POTENTIALS OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN TANZANIA
The lives of all Tanzania are connected to the
environment.
E.g. Our
survival and survival of the future generation depends on the harmonious
relationship with the natural resources in the environment. Tanzanians
therefore, have no choice, but strive to manage the environment and its natural
resources. The natural resources should be managed in a way that enhances the
potential for growth and opportunity for sustainable development of present and
future generations.
Environmental problems in Tanzania are real and not
some one’s else problems.
The extraction of natural resources from the
environment should not exceed the natural resource generation. When should note
that, a health economy and a health environment go hand in hand; both are
needed for our survival and prosperity.
We are therefore called for the wise use of natural
resources for betterment of the present and future generations.
THE GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES TO COMBAT ENVIRONMENTAL
PROBLEMS IN TANZANIA
Tanzania is committed to sustainable development
through long term and short term plans.
Environmental protection is a social and economic
necessity; it is an integral component of sustainable development.
Satisfaction of basic needs is an environmental
concern of relevant natural resources policy
and environmental policy.
The natural resources in the environment should be
exploited with a great care and any developmental investment should be done in
a sustainable manner.
The environment and its natural resources are the
first victim of things like:
v Acute
poverty urbanization
v
Overgrazing
v
Deforestation
v Mining
v
Overfishing
Natural
resources extraction must aim at eradicating poverty among the people through:
·
Eradication of diseases
·
Guaranteed food security
·
Guaranteed shelter
·
Guaranteed safe and clean water
·
Guaranteed employment
·
Guaranteed income generation.
At the same time, the natural resources extraction
should consider the ecological concerns and the natural regeneration of
resources.
The environmental conservation strategies in
Tanzania can be explained as follows:
a.Historical Overview
1929:-formation of advisory committee on terrain
after Dodoma conference.
1952:-formation of native authority ordinance.
The local authorities were given mandate to combat
land degradation.
-Formation of other ordinances from time to time; e.g.
·
National park ordinance
·
Forestry ordinance
·
Natural resources ordinance
·
Grass fire control ordinance etc.
b. Recent
Efforts
1.
Establishment of national, regional and district based programs and
projects.
E.g.;
§ NEMC – established by an act of parliament no.19
of 1983
To provide advisory
role to the government
§ HASHI (Shinyanga)
§ HESAWA (Lake Zone)
§ HADO (Dodoma)
§ KIGOMA- Rukwa integrated development program.
2.
Promoting and sensitizing communities and individual participation as a
strategy to invigorate (fill something with energy) environmental conservation
and natural resources management.
3. Environmental awareness
campaigns through media institutions (radio, TV, Press, Newspapers)
4.
Establishment of community based organizations (CBO’S) to promote
environmental conservation.
·
HASHI
· SEMA
·
HADO
5.
Establishment of Non Governmental organizations (NGO’S) LAVEMP
6.
Adoption of sector policies related with forest, mineral, wildlife,
fisheries, agriculture and livestock; which actually put priority on
conservation and management of resources and environment.
7.
Subjecting the issues of environmental and resources conservation into
the education curriculum/ learning programs and courses covered into high
institutions.
- But: The Strategies were/
are not fully implemented due to the following:
1.
Lack of good governance
2.
Corruption/ embezzlement
3.
Lack of mass education
4. Poverty
5.
Social beliefs
6.
Gender imbalance
7.
Negligence (leaders and natives)
8.
Communication breakdown
9.
Misconception; that resources are owned by the state.
10.
Incompetent leaders.
Natural Resources/ Environmental Management Options
Proper resource management is therefore based on
recognition that less resource use can lead to long term economic benefits and
recued environmental costs. Such management, while recognizing that some
resource use is unavoidable thus seeks to minimize use where possible.
Resource management is encompassed with three basic
options that can ensure minimum resource utilization; which are; Preservation,
Conservation and Restoration.
i. Environmental Preservation
This refers to nonuse. A ‘‘preserved’’ national park
or wilderness area is an ecosystem that is set aside and (in theory at least)
protected in its pristine condition or natural state.
In this areas consumptive use of products are
prohibited.
ii. Environmental Conservation
This is an attempt to minimize use of natural
resource. This can be attained through
efficiency improvements, recycling
or reuse and
substitution of other
resources. Environmental conservation usually ensures longevity in
resource utilization. When environment
is conserved the resources therein are conserved. Resource conservation is
important as it;
(a) Slows depletion of resources
(b)
Reduces pollution by
slowing flow of
materials and energy
(throughput) through society and
(c) Saves money for example burning less coal by
increasing power plant’s efficiency not only saves coal but produces less acid
rain and other forms of pollution.
iii. Environmental Restoration
This is
the process of
returning a degraded
resource into its
original state. The rapidly growing field of restoration
ecology is attempting to return many ecosystems, such as tall grass degraded
grasslands and wetlands into their original state. Mining activities in most
cases alter the
nature of landscape
and many plants are
cleared and their
existence is therefore threatened.
After mining operations especially open cast mining deliberate efforts
should be taken to restore the origin landscape i.e scenery of the place in
question and its plant population
Environmental Restoration is the deliberate attempt
to speed recovery of damaged areas. It ranges from practical and economic
attempts to simply restore some productivity to degraded grazing lands, to the
attempt to return full ecosystem function and structure in protected
ecosystems. Restoration is needed virtually everywhere humans have been active
past the hunter-gatherer stage. A third of the surface of the earth is
afflicted with land degradation or desertification and this affects almost a
billion people. Every year 6 million
an additional hectares
are completely lost
to production according
to U.N. estimates and
60% of the
rangeland, 60% of
rain-fed croplands and 30%
of irrigated croplands are at
risk. Protecting and restoring damaged lands requires an understanding of
ecology, economics, psychology and culture.
Methods of Resource Conservation
The resources are well managed/conserved by three
basic practices/methods namely; Efficiency, Recycling and substitution.
i.
Efficiency
Efficiency
improvement is generally
most effective and
economically sound because many technologies and activities are wasteful and inefficient. Efficiency improvements
occur when the same task is accomplished with fewer resources.
Example, about two-thirds of the water used in
irrigation is lost through evaporation. Using micro irrigation where
water is carried
by pipes and
sprayed through small
holes decreases water loss to
less than 20%.
Inefficiency
in resource utilization
is costly to
the economy but
efficient utilization of resource results into enormous gains as it
conserves resources like minerals and others.
Besides the economic savings, environmental saving
from efficiency is also enormous.
Less depletion saves more resources for future
generations. Less resource extracted means less degradation of the
land. Less resource
use as well reduces
environmental pollution which
in a way
translates into resource
pollution.
ii. Resource reuse and Recycling
Reuse
occurs when the
same resource is
used again in
the same manner,
for example refilling soda
bottles. Recycling is more or less similar to reuse but the resource is not
used in the same form. With recycling
the original materials are made into other
devices for
example soda bottles
may be remelted
to make new
bottles or other
glass containers. Reuse as efficiency, reduces resource depletion and
pollution from resource extraction and use. Reuse/recycling is useful in
reducing solid wastes. This further spares land that would be used as landfills
for such solid wastes.
Recycling scheme begins with virgin resources which
are the original resources being extracted. The recycling loop begins just
before the purchased product is discarded; the discard is reprocessed into the
same or perhaps another product. The loop is closed when someone buys a product
containing recycled material. This slows depletion of virgin resources and
reduces pollution in two basic ways.
Most
basic it reduces
the amount of
solid wastes that
would have been
discarded into landfills and
incinerators. It further reduces
wastes that would have
been processed by extraction of more virgin resources.
Advanced form of recycling is precycling. This is
not actually recycling but conservation by increased efficiency, the same task
is accomplished but fewer resources are used. For
example
reduce of packaging materials
by concentration of
foods. Concentrated foods require
small package materials.
iv. Substitution
Substitution in terms of resources is the process
whereby one resource is used instead of the other. Substitution can also help
to reduce both depletion and pollution problems. It
helps
with depletion because
when one resource
is being depleted,
a more common substitute can be used at a cheaper
price. For example aluminum a very common metal in
the
earth’s crust can
sometimes be substituted
for much rarer
and more expensive
in making alloys, equipments
and other uses.
Substitution reduces
pollution when extraction, processing
and disposal of
substituted resources produce
less pollution. For example
many plastics last
for 50 to
100 years in
the environment before
they significantly decompose. The plastics are made from nonrenewable
resource, petroleum, whereas trees are renewable. Such considerations have led to substitution
of paper for plastic in many items, such
as drinking cups and containers.
Although
it can be
useful in reducing
resource depletion, substitution
is often less desirable than
efficiency improvements and
reuse/recycle. Instead of
reducing overall
resource depletion substitution
often simply switches
depletion from one
resource to another. This
can be satisfactory
if the new
resource is renewable,
as in paper
or very abundant as
with glass made
from sand.
Furthermore, substitution does not solve the
problems of pollution, solid waste or other output problems completely, for
instance, the use of paper products offers many environmental advantages over
plastic, but it may do little to solve landfill space problems. Paper is indeed
a very big problem in urban areas currently.
It is very difficult to find affordable substitutes
for some resources i.e water for most of its uses. There
is hardly a
substitute for drinking and
agricultural water, so
increased efficiency and recycle/reuse of waste water are the common
options.
Conclusion
The Need for Resource Management: The need for
resource management is inescapable. As
human population and technologies grow
inevitably the pressures
to exploit the
environmental resources will increase. Proper management can help minimize
environmental damage. Careful planning
of water use for instance could spare water for natural ecosystems that would
have been used for agriculture.
Furthermore management can help undo past damage.
Elimination of alien (introduced) species for example is a common management
strategy for some biological communities.
Thus though resource management is not attractive
concept in some ways, it is preferable to
the alternative, which
is uncontrolled resource
exploitation. Global society
will be
facing
many difficult environmental
challenges in the
near future. This
being the case therefore, making informed decisions
about how to use resources is essential for the well being of the resource and
resource users. It is because
of this importance
of resource management
that some people
have even resolved to consider
the concept of resource management as
Human arrogance. They argue that viewing natural environment as ‘‘a resource’’
is a very narrow anthropocentric approach to nature.
Another
objection is that
the concept assumes
that humans not
only should manage environmental resources
but are capable
of managing them effectively.
Environmental ethics revolve around whether humans have a right to
tamper with nature and if so how much tampering is justified. If ethics are set
aside, the assumption that humans are able as a practical reality, to
effectively manage nature is not shown in human history.
RESOURCES USE CONFLICTS AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
NATURAL RESOURCES USE CONFLICTS
These are disagreements and disputes over access to,
control and use of natural resources available in a particular area within a
specified period of time (FAO, 2000).
The conflicts often emerge because people have
different uses for resources such forests, water, land; minerals etc or want to
manage them in different ways.
Sometimes this occurs as the result of incompatible
interests and needs or when the priorities of some user groups/ stake holders
are not considered in policies or short- term plans, projects and programs. In
recent years, the scope and magnitude of natural resource use conflicts have
increased and intensified.
These conflicts, if not addressed can escalate (cause
increase) into violence, cause environmental degradation, disrupt projects, and
undermine livelihood of the people.
Natural resources use conflicts have always been
with us due to multiple and competing demands on resources.
They have been associated with the excludability of
some user groups from participating in natural resources management. Conflicts
have been associated with the contradictions between local and the introduced
management systems, misunderstandings and lack of information about policy and
program objectives, contradictions or lack of clarity in laws and policies,
inequity in resources distribution, poor policy and program implementation with
respect to natural resources use. Conflicts always exist to some degree in
every community, but it can be often managed or resolved. They vary widely by
place, and overtime.
They manifest themselves through breaking rules, or
sabotage and violence.
Sometimes conflicts remain hidden or latent (present
but unexpressed) due to fear, peer pressure, distrust, and financial
constraints.
Types of Natural Resource Use Conflicts
They include;
a.
The interest conflicts
b.
The value conflicts
c.
The cognitive conflicts
d.
The behavioral conflicts
(i)
The Interest Conflicts
These are conflicts that result from conflicting
interests from different people on the use of a certain resource.
If the uses or interests are not compatible,
conflicts are likely to occur.
They develop when the parties/ group have
incompatible interests on the use of a particular resource
Example; Farmers v/s Pastoralists
Forest conservationists against farmers
Investors against local individuals etc
The interests differ because one resource may have
multiple uses.
(ii)
Value Conflicts
These conflicts arise when there are opposing views
as to what benefit/ value the resource shall give and who will benefit from a
resource.
Human beings usually attach different values to
natural resources, and the value of natural resources in one community can
differ to the value of that very resource to other community.
Sometimes the value of a resource can differ among
individuals in the same community.
Consider: watershed Forests.
(iii)
Cognitive Conflicts
They arise when there are different understandings
of resources situation and technical information. Or
Arise due to perceptions and altitudes associated to
the use knowledge and judgment of a particular technology over the available
resources.
They are also as the result of community perceptions
over a certain resource i.e. (The meaning they put over the resource)
For instance: Some Maasai perceive that every cattle
is theirs, wherever they find cattle they claim to be theirs.
(iv)
Behavioral Conflicts
They arise when human beings do not understand or
have difficulties with accepting other people’s behavior over certain
resources.
It is a result of failure of communication to find
out a practicable solution on the use of a particular resource.
E.g. Refugees and local community on forest
resources
SOME OF THE CAUSES OF NATURAL RESOURCES USE
CONFLICTS
i.
Population growth
ii.
Presence of exclusion policies
E.g. 28% of
Tanzania land is protected as N/Parks and G/ Reserves.
-
The local residents are forced / alienated from their areas hence
conflicts.
-
Excluding human activities in N/Parks brings about conflicts.
iii.
Unequal distribution of land among the people
- The
haves own large land than they have notes.
iv.
Conflicting sectoral objectives
E.g.
When you read on urban water supply objective or Fisheries objectives-
environmental conservation objectives, there will be contradicting ideas.
E.gConserving the land and land use/ activities
fishing and water quality preservation. etc.
v.
Tribalism /Regionalism
E.g.
ownership of resources and utilization of resources among the tribes/regions
vi. Change of government political parties.
-
Political parties that different policies over the use of resources.
Case studies of natural resource use conflicts in
Tanzania.
Determining factors for the continuing conflicts
related to natural resources.
CASE STUDIES OF NATURAL RESOURCE USE CONFLICTS
a)
Conflicts over Natural Resources in Simanjiro District, Tanzania
Simanjiro District lies south of Arusha town on the
Maasai steppe and is categorized as a semi-arid zone. 85% of the 65000
inhabitants who lived here in 1995 are Maasai pastoralists. There are also
other Bantu groups, the majority recent immigrants, living in the district and
practicing subsistence agriculture. Small groups of Ndorobo hunters and gathers
are found scattered throughout the district. They are few in numbers compared
to the pastoralists and farmers and are living in abject poverty.
In addition to livestock and vast stretches of open
land the district is also bestowed with substantial quantities of gemstones and
wildlife resources. Because of the availability of natural resources deemed
necessary for development, various individuals and groups of people have
migrated into the district in large numbers in recent years. This situation has
led to various conflicts between the immigrants and inhabitants of the district
over management and utilization of the available resources.
Background to the conflicts
Large scale commercial farming
Land use is a key issue and the alienation of land
is a source of considerable tension in the district. By 1994 over 50 000 ha of
land had been alienated in Simanjiro district for about 80 large scale farms
ranging between 90 and 13 000 ha. These farms only produce seed beans, the
majority of which are exported to Holland. To discourage and prevent
pastoralists from grazing their cattle on these farms, all biomass residues are
burnt immediately after harvest.
This type of land alienation is achieved through
title deeds granted by the Government to the immigrant settlers without any consideration
of the resident Maasai's land use needs. Although the law requires that before
such deeds to public land are granted current owners and users are consulted,
this is not always the case for pastoral lands.
In losing control of their right of land use
planning over these alienated lands, the Maasai have in fact also been denied
their livelihood which has been centredaround optimum use of resources through
traditional pastoralism. The pastoral use of natural resources has an inbuilt
flexibility which takes into consideration prevailing conditions and has proven
to be an effective response to the exigencies of a difficult environment for
many generations. This flexibility is now severely taxed as traditional grazing
areas have been lost to large scale farms. Traditional grazing patterns have
been disturbed or restricted to confined places which has led both to herd
losses and to over exploitation and degradation of resources.
Land alienation inevitably includes the loss of
vital traditional water sources as the land demarcated for the farms
encompasses several natural water holes and springs to which herders are now
denied access and control. Local pastoral control of water resources works
because it is based on principles of equal and fair rights and responsibilities
to share among all herders in need of water for their stock. Control by these
new immigrants has meant exclusion of the pastoralists and this has only led to
conflict.
The combined loss of grazing and water rights are
the two most serious problems for the Maasai in Simanjiro. These are compounded
by others. Stock routes to access other resources, ea. salt licks, livestock
markets, etc. have been blocked by 'private real estates'. The language is
'Trespassers will be prosecuted' and it is not just a wooden law without
meaning. Its active enforcement has daily implications for the Maasai. Examples
abound of the shooting of cattle and people, of fines being levied, of cattle
being confiscated and of pastoralists being imprisoned. To add insult to injury
most of the land acquired through these title deeds is not put into immediate
cultivation or grazing use but rather is held for speculative purposes. From
the perspective of the pastoralists, who are restricted, barred and confined
from the proximity of their land over which they now apparently have no
acknowledged legal rights of access and control, this is a threat to their
survival. They see this land, which they are in immediate need of using, lying
idle. The result has been that the pastoralists' claims and immediate needs
come into head on conflicts with the speculative purposes for which this land
is being held.
Mining
The second source of land use conflicts in the
district is the use of land for mining of gemstones and other precious minerals.
Mining in the district started in the late 1960s when immigrant individual
miners began digging pit mines down to 50 meters underground using only the
crudest of equipment. The realisation of the seemingly unlimited supply of
gemstones, especially the rare and precious 'tanzanite', coupled with the
opening of the economy in the mid 1980s, has encouraged both national and
foreign mining companies to rush into these areas to establish and expand
mining operations. Previously small villages were quickly transformed into
'gold-rush' towns bustling with activity mostly carried out by and of benefit
to people from outside the district and Maasai communities. Mining companies
have obtained mining concessions over large chunks of pastoral lands from the
Government to explore for and extract gemstones. Suddenly these lands became
'prohibited lands' to the pastoralists who are no longer allowed to use them
for their own purpose. The expanding mining activities in the district are
being carried out parallel to the main land use activity for which this area is
best suited, ie. pastoralism. Mining has become a competitor rather than a
complementary activity to pastoralism and in several cases is clearly
antagonistic. These 'outsiders' have grabbed opportunities available in the
district while local inhabitants have been left unaware of the economic value
of the mining resources and have consequently been marginalised.
In addition to losing access to large areas of
grazing land and water rights, mining activities have brought with them other
hazards. These include increasing numbers of accidents when herders and their
cattle have fallen into abandoned and uncovered mining pits and increasing
numbers of livestock thefts by miners. Also there is serious environmental degradation,
ea. deforestation due to land being cleared to facilitate mining activities and
to meet the rising demand for fuelwood and charcoal in the numerous bustling
towns. Soil erosion caused by this deforestation coupled to the underground
soils being brought to the surface and washed into the rivers during the rainy
season is polluting the rivers. Dynamite blasting is also making its
contribution to environmental problems and, together with the pit mines, marrs
the countryside with ugly scars.
Equally evident and perhaps even more harmful is the
distortion of the Maasai culture. The influx of people to pastoral lands for
mining opportunities has brought along with it alien and incompatible cultures
and customs, new and previously unheard of human diseases, and new and
conflicting knowledge systems and skills concerning nature and resource use,
and conflicting interests.
Tourism
The third major area of conflicts over land use is
related to tourism and its accompanying new ideas concerning wildlife resources
management and utilization. In this regard it is important to make clear that
pastoralism and wildlife (both wild animals and wild plants) are not in
conflict with each other. In fact they have co-existed in harmony since time
immemorial and a natural balance has existed in resource use. Today, the
government's emphasis on mass tourism and top down approaches to wildlife
management involves the establishment and expansion of protected areas and the
enactment and enforcement of wildlife legislation. This has accelerated the
competitive trends and accentuated the differences between the consumptive and
non-consumptive approaches to natural resources. The modern world sees nature
as something to be owned, consumed, hunted and photographed – bush meat,
medicinal plants, hunters' trophies, the Maasai. The values of the Maasai have
on the other hand stressed the non-consumptive values of nature and the
importance of respecting the natural balances, which have included human
enjoyment of these magnificent resources but also acknowledging the need to
live in harmony as part of a whole.
The 'modern' seems to be winning and dominates the
agenda, bringing with it the destruction of wildlife resources, now the
'property' of the state. The new rules and law enforcement practices in the
name of wildlife conservation have been instituted to replace traditional
methods of wildlife management. As a result, land has been lost to wildlife by
creating protected areas (National Parks, Game Reserves, Buffer Zones, etc.).
Households have been forced to stop their animals from grazing in these areas.
At the same time the wild animals have been allowed to graze with domestic
animals in traditional grazing areas such as the Simanjiro Plains. This
situation has enabled the transmission of diseases like malignant catarrah
fever from wildebeest to livestock. The pastoralists, to diminish the risk,
have no choice but to surrender this grazing land to the wildebeest. However,
they are not allowed to compensate this loss by grazing their herds in wildlife
designated areas during times of the year when this would be safe. Nor are they
compensated for diseases, lost fodder or damage to their crops. Rather, because
it is an offence to graze in protected areas, the local residents are now being
fined, imprisoned or having their livestock confiscated. The wildlife
conservation effort is made antagonistic to the pastoralists way of life, thus
leading to further conflicts.
Finding a way forward
In trying to find ways to address the serious
conflicts and environmental problems presently existing in Simanjiro District
it appears that a radical change is required. This change must be based on
recognition of the Maasai's rights and capacity to make an informed
contribution to the planning of all activities in their area. Acknowledging
their capacity to manage the natural resources in a sustainable manner as well
as their rights to do so implies that they must be given a leading voice in
deciding how these resources, the land and water, the wildlife, and the
minerals can best be utilized. This utilization can not only be to contribute
in a meaningful way to the short term economic development of the country
today. It must also ensure that local people, those dependent on these
resources for their survival today and in the future, will benefit and be able
to contribute to sustainable use that will help to create the kind of world
where the needs of all take precedence over the greeds of a few. The challenge
remains. Let their voices be heard.
Note
The situation in Simanjiro is critical and for the
Maasai living here it is a question of their very survival. It is clear to us
that natural resource management must be informed and directed by local
communities who are one of the central stakeholders in these resources. Their
inclusion in policy and decision making requires the direct communication of
their perspectives on the problems and solutions with respect to land, natural
resource management and tenure. We feel that the new video technology, as it
has been used by the Maasai in Ngorongoro (see article on page 28) offers an
opportunity to make this possible. We invited those who are involved in
development work in this district to support such an effort.
b)THE NGORONGORO CONSERVATION AREA (NCA)
- It was
established in 1959
-
The purpose for its establishment was to protect the unique blend of
scenery, wildlife, human culture and pre- history.
-
The area occupies 59% of Ngorongoro
district in the Northeastern part of Arusha region.
-
It is not a national park, but a multi- use conservation area.
I.e. managing diverse interests.
E.g. Tourism industry
Community development
Conservation of nature and wildlife etc.
-
It is a UNESSCO world Heritage site and considered in the eighth wonders
of the world.
-
It is one the sites with great tourist attraction and yielding the
highest foreign exchange income in the tourist sector.
-
It is a home for a population of 59,858 Maasai / together owning a large
number of cattle , donkeys, sheep and goals (national census, 2002)
E.g. cattle: 117, 300
Donkeys: 18441
Sheep and goal: 164, 490
-
The beauty of Ngorongoro is the result of the reality that the Maasai
pastoralists have co- existed harmoniously with flora and fauna for centuries.
-
Historically, conservationists and
government decision makers have tended to look at the beauty and
uniqueness of Ngorongoro area as something existing inspite of pastoralism and
human influence rather because of pastoralist land management actions.
-
The Ngorongoro conservation area pastoralists have been struggling for
their human and civil rights since 1958, therefore the conflicts with
conservation interests have prevailed over the last 50years.
-
In the conservation process. The Maasai were internally displaced.
-
The scenario of the internal displacement started when the Maasai
traditional leaders agreed to sign a treaty to move with their herds and settle
to the high lands of Ngorongoro and
never claim back the yast land of Ngorongoro . they were promised by the
colonialists that they would be provided
with:
§ Better
education
§ Water
supply
§ Improve
livelihood.
-
The traditional leaders who signed the contract were by that unqualified
people. In legal terms it means they were not of sound minds for the purpose of
making the contracts.
-
After giving up their land, they realized great loses of :-
·
Vast grazing area
·
Permanent sources of water
·
Salt licks.
-
Being forced to stay in the highlands of Ngorongoro, their livestock’s
were exposed to diseases like :- east coast fever (ECF), Rinderpest ,Tick born
diseases
-
Currently the Ngorongoro conservation area worries about. Population increase, subsistence
agriculture- problem, modern human settlement structure within NCA.
-
The population growth is not compromising with the carrying capacity of
the rangeland.
Key determining factors for the continuing conflicts
within the Ngorongoro conservation area
1.
The Security of Land Tenure
-
Alienation of pastoral land due to promotion of tourist services and
conservation purpose.
E.g.
construction of tourist Hotels like SERENA SOPA lodges.
-
The environmental degradation was most noted around the staff houses.
-
The land in NCA is subjected to vagaries/ unpredictable- short-
term politically motivated changes and
administrative decisions
The land use in N.C.A is a matter of political
struggle rather than scientific planning or efficient management.
2.
Inappropriate Policies
There is a large body of literature examining
several facts/ aspects regarding the lives of pastoralists in Ngorongoro.
The information have been developed into policies
and laws with both negative and positive impacts to the inhabitants of the
Ngorongoro conservation area.
The policies formulated from time to time increase
tension to eliminate the local community. The local rights of occupation are
extinguished/ put to an end.
Pastoralism has lacked support at the highest levels
of government and has rarely, if even, benefited from the institutional
frameworks designed for the improvement of the area.
3.
Increased Level of Vulnerability And Poverty
The ability of pastoralists to manage the ecological
uncertainty and spread risks has been reduced significantly.
These have been a reduced mobility of herds and a
change in the patterns of resources utilization and shrinkage of the resources
base.
This has in turn led to livestock loses
§ Increased
level of poverty
§ Food
insecurity to the local inhabitants
§ Poor
access to socio- economic services
§ Social
dislocation
§ Political
marginalization
4.
Deteriorating Water Infrastructure
Water is a very important resource to the Maasai of
NCA for the daily use and management of pasture.
Most of permanent water sources are under the
custodianship of specific people (hotels and lodges administration). This has
been causing the continuing of the conflicts between the Maasai and the
custodians of water.
Some water sources are naturally occurring springs,
and some are managed springs or dug wells.
The problem of shortage of water has been as the
result of the custodians of water to regulate the livestock access to water
according to the amount of water available.
Water quality is highly contaminated by the
livestock and wildlife urines.
5.
Lack of Vibrant Civil Society Organization
– The vibrant civil society could help in policy
formulation issues. Also to defend and promote the interests of the indigenous
Maasai.
There is lack of organizations that can defend the
interest of pastoralists.
c) Natural resources use conflicts in Kasulu
District
The main natural resources in Kasulu district are
land, water (rivers), and forests. Land is mainly used for peasantry farming,
and there is small scale irrigation in the river valleys i.e. vegetable
cultivation. The native ethnic group is “Waha” which is dominant, whereas the
“Wasukuma” ethnic group from Mwanza and Shinyanga regions is the minority.
Generally, in Kasulu district, land is not limited – there is big uncultivated
land and adequate water sources; districts at nearby regions land is not
limited as well, but it is comparatively less fertile; it receives inadequate
and unreliable rainfall, and there are limited water sources.
Those nearby districts are from Shinyanga and Mwanza
regions where there are many pastoralists – “Wasukuma” ethnic group.
Pastoralists (“Wasukuma” in particular) normally migrate from their original
locations to other places within and without Wikipedia:Tanzania in search of
pastures for their cattle as pastures and water from their original localities
are continuing to decrease time after time due to overuse of natural vegetation
and corresponding climate change. Natural resources use is now causing turbulence
between the local community “Waha” and some Burundi and Democratic Republic of
Congo refugees from Mtabila and Nyagarusu camps respectively and “Wasukuma”
(pastoralists) from Shinyanga and Mwanza regions. Refugees are cutting trees
and hunting some of wild animals in community forests while “Wasukuma” are
accompanied with big flocks of cattle which cause environmental degradation and
sometimes feed on/destroy crops in the farms.
Conflicts regarding natural resources use in Kasulu
district have been resolved amicably through the systems in place, such as
police and game reserve guards that cooperate with community; leadership chain
i.e. from Ten Cell Leader to the District Commissioner; Experts – there are
Village Extension Agents, teachers, famous people, and others at village level
who also contribute to the protection of natural resources and conflict
resolution and; there are also scheduled conflict resolution meetings and ward
tribunal councils aiming at discussing and resolving issues related to the
natural resources use since they are not violent.[10] Hence, further and
sustainable measures should be done to stop those conflicts from growing from
non violent to violent stage.
RESOURCES USE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
In NRM it has been argued that there are diverse NR
use conflicts, but people typically may accept the conflict resolution using
various methods/ styles.
-
Different styles are most useful in different situations e.g. Magnitude,
place, member of the society, political issues, socio- economic status etc and
each has its strengths and weaknesses.
The Styles / Methods include:-
i.
Collaborative Style
They to meet all the needs of the people involved in
the conflict.
Treat everyone as an important person in the matter
concerned.
Bring together variety of viewpoints to get the best
solution- e.g. history of the conflict etc.
ii.
Compromising Style
-
Look / find a solution that would at least partially satisfy everyone.
- Everyone is supposed to give up
something and relinquish something.
-
Show the people the cost of conflict is higher than the cost of losing.
iii.
Accommodating Style
-
This involves willingness to meet the needs of others at the expense of
the person’s needs.
-
It means that should be adaptable enough to allow things be done without
major changes. They should adjust in response to the needs of somebody.
iv.
Avoiding Style
Persuade people to avoid the conflict entirely. They
should delegate controversial decisions, accept default decisions, and not
wanting to hurt anyone’s feelings. Mostly applied when the victory is
impossible
v.
Use of Force/War
- Make sure that all people accept the
decision or they like or not.
-
Take firm stand to what has / have been decided for a fast
implementation.
-
It is coercive in nature, sometimes involve the use of force, threats
etc to make people accept the decision against their will.
INTEGATING NATURAL RRSOURCES MANAGEMENT
-
To integrate means make something open to all. It also refers to the
process of making a group, community, place or organization aware and able to
participate into a particular aspect regardless of race, ethnicity, religion,
gender or social/ class.
Importance of integrated resource management
i) Integrated resource management will help
environmental managers and governments at
large to apply long term goals and set priorities
based on information about all resources. This will further maintain the health
of our ecosystems in which resources are found
ii) Resource managers will be able to periodically
plan, act, control, balance and report on the actual consumption of all
resources.
iii) Integrated resource management will create
synergies and new efficiencies from all resources working together
iv) Integrated resource utilization will integrate
sustainability issues in all administration
departments
v) Integrated resource management is the approach
that will support politicians in setting
priorities and steering local sustainability, as
well as gaining a comprehensive overview of available resources
vi) Integrated resource management will further
reduce or eliminate resource user conflicts
-
Natural resources management needs participatory methods for its
success. One of the methods include participatory rural appraisal (PRA)
PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL
-
This is a collaborative decision making and it is a community- based
method.
-
It is a label given to a growing family of participatory methods that
emphasize or local knowledge and enable local people to make their own
appraisal, analysis, and plans for NRM.
-
It facilitates information sharing, analysis, and action among stake
holders.
-
Originally it was developed for use in rural areas, but it has been
employed successfully in a variety of settings including urban areas.
-
Its purpose is to enable development practitioners, government
officials, and local people to work together and plan appropriate programs with
respect to NRM.
-
Under this method data collection and analysis are undertaken by local
people, with outsiders facilitating rather than controlling. This gives the
local community a sense of belonging and feeling that they are valued hence
avoiding conflict.
Key Tenets of PRA
I.
Participation
Local people’s input into PRA activities is
essential to its value in planning for NRM because it makes people
p[participate and have a sense of being considered and not ignored.
Local people usually know very well all the
necessary things that are to be considered in the whole process of NRM.
II.
Team Work
-
All necessary things should be done through interaction and
brainstorming among the involved.
-
It should be done by a team that include local people with perspective
and knowledge of the area’s conditions and social structure.
-
A well balanced team should represent the diversity of socio-economic,
cultural, gender, and generational perspectives.
III. Flexibility
PRA does not provide blueprints for its
practitioners.
The combination of techniques that are appropriate
will be determined by the size of the context and skills of PRA team, time and
resources available, location, etc.
IV.
Ignoring Optimal Ignorance.
This is connected to the factor that should be
efficient in teams of both time and money.
PRA tends to gather/ collect enough information to
make necessary recommendations and decisions in NRM.
V.
Triangulation
To ensure that the information is valid and
reliable, PRA teams follow the rule of thumb that at least three sources must
be consulted or appropriate techniques must be used to investigate the same
topics with regards to NRM.
PROTECTED AREAS MANAGEMENT
What is a protected area?
- IUCN (International Union
For Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources); defines the protected area
as an area of land or sea specifically dedicated to the protection and
maintenance of biological diversity and of natural and associated cultural
resources managed through legal or other effective means
- Although all protected
areas meet the general purposes mentioned in the above definition, in practice
the precise purpose for which protected areas are managed differ from different
categories.
CATEGORIES OF PROTECTED AREAS
- There are major six
categories of the protected areas
We differentiate these categories by considering the
primary purposes/ management objectives/ reasons/ rationale
Category 1
(a) Strict Nature Reserve
(b) Wilderness
area
(a)
STRICT NATURE RESERVES
- The main purpose for
protection is for science (The study of physical and Natural world)
Definition
- It is an area of land or
sea possessing some outstanding or representative ecosystems, geological or
physiological features or species available primarily for scientific research or environmental monitoring
Eg. Amani Nature Reserve
Eastern Arc mountain (Uluguru, East Usanbara, Udzungwa)- propositions
are underway
Objective of the management
i.
To preserve habitats, ecosystems and species in an undisturbed state as
possible
ii.
To maintain established ecological processes
iii.
To secure examples of natural
environment for scientific studies, environmental monitoring and education
iv.
To limit public access
(b)
WILDERNESS AREA
- This is a protected area that is managed mainly for
wilderness protection
Definition
- The large area of
unmodified or slightly modified land or sea retaining its natural character and
influence without permanent or significant human habitation which is protected
and managed so as to preserve its natural condition.
Category 2: NATIONAL PARKS
- The primary objective of
National Park is ecosystem protection and recreation
Eg. Serengeti, Mikumietc
Definition
It
is a natural area of land or sea designed
v To
protect ecological integrity of one or more ecosystems for present and future
generations,
v To
exclude exploitation or occupation to the purposes of designation of the area.
v To
provide a foundation for spiritual scientific, educational, recreational and
visitor opportunities, all of which must be environmentally and culturally
compatible.
Objectives of National Parks Management
i.
To protect natural and scenic
areas of national and international significant for spiritual scientific,
educational, and recreational or tourist purposes.
ii.
To perpetuate in as natural state as possible a representative examples
of physiographic regions, biotic communities, genetic resources and species to
provide ecological stability and diversity.
iii.
To manage visitor use for inspirational, educational, cultural and
recreational purposes which will maintain the area in a natural or near natural
state.
iv.
To maintain respect for ecological geomorphologies sacred or aesthetic
attributes which warrant designation.
Category 3: NATURAL MONUMENT
- The primary purpose for
protection is conservation of specific natural features
Eg.
vMbozi meteorite
vAmboni caves
v Natural
monument in lake Manyara
vBismark rocks – Mwanza
Definition
- It is an area containing
one or more specific natural or cultural feature which is of outstanding or
unique value because of its inherent rarity, representative qualities, or cultural significance.
Objectives of Natural monument management
i.
To protect or preserve perpetuity specific outstanding natural features
because of their natural significance, uniqueness or representation quality or
spiritual connotations.
ii.
To provide opportunities for research, education interpretation and
public appreciation.
iii.
To provide benefits to the surrounding community
iv.
To eliminate and thereafter prevent exploitation or occupation with
respect to the purpose of designation.
Category 4: HABITATS OR SPECIES MANAGEMENT AREA
- The primary purpose of
this is to manage the areas for
conservation through management
intervention (Endangered species protection/ management )
Selous
Eg.
v Game
reserves – habitat
vNgorongoro conservation area (NCA) – species –
habitat
Definition
- It is the area of land or sea
subjected to active intervention for management purposes so as to ensure
maintenance of habitats to meet the requirements of specific species.
Objectives of management
i.
To provide benefits to the surrounding community
ii.
To facilitate scientific research
and environmental monitoring as primary activities associated with sustainable
resources management.
iii.
To secure and maintain the habitat conditions necessary to protect
significant species, groups of species, biotic communities or physical feature
of the environment where these require
specific attention.
Category 5:
PROTECTED LANDSCAPE OR SEASCAPE
- The primary purpose for
this is management of landscape and seascape for conservation and recreation.
Eg. Seascape in Tanzania Msambeni -Tanga
Bagamoyo
Rufiji – Mafia complex
Landscape
Longido Heart lands; which include the slopes of mount Kilimanjaro and Savannah
area of Longido.
Contains mammal and birds (more than 400 species)
In
this area, the Maasai people (pastoralists) have lived here for over 400 years;
they have
co-existed with the wildlife in a relative harmony.
vTarangire / Manyaro Heart land
v Mafia
Island
Definition
- It is an area of land or
sea where the interaction of people and nature overtime has produced an area of
distinct character with significant ecological or cultural values and often with
biological diversity.
- Safeguarding the
integrity of this traditional interaction is vital to the protection, maintenance and evaluation of
such areas
Objectives of management
i.
To maintain harmonious interaction of nature and culture through the
protection of landscape or seascape and the continuation of traditional land
uses building practices and socio-cultural values.
ii.
To support lifestyle and economic activities which are in harmony with
nature and the prevention of socio-cultural fabric of the communities
concerned.
iii.
To maintain the diversity of landscape and habitat of associated species
and ecosystem.
iv.
To eliminate where necessary and thereafter prevent land uses and
activities which are inappropriate in scale and character.
v.
To provide opportunities for public enjoyment through recreation and
tourism appropriate in scale and type.
Category 6: MANAGED RESOURCES PROTECTED AREA
- The main purpose of this
is to protect a resource for sustainable use of natural ecosystem
Eg.
v Many
forest reserves
vKazimzumbwe protected area
v Mafia
island
vMnazi boy – Ruvuma
Definition
- It is an area containing
predominantly natural systems managed to ensure long term protection and
maintenance of biological diversity while at the sometime providing sustainable
flow of natural products and services to meet community needs.
Objectives of management
i.
To protect and maintain the biological diversity and other natural
values of the area in a long term
ii.
To promote sound management practices for sustainable production
purposes
iii.
To protect the natural resources base by being alternated for other hand
use purposes that would be detrimental to the area’s biodiversity
iv.
To contribute to regional and national development.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF AREAS FOR PROTECTION
Category 1: STRICT NATURE RESERVE/ WILDERNESS AREA
v Protected
area managed mainly for science/wilderness protection
Criteria
1. The area should be large enough to ensure integrity of its ecosystems
and to accomplish the management objectives for which it is protected.
2. It should be significantly free from direct human intervention and
capable of remaining so.
Category 2: NATIONAL PARK
v Protected
area managed mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation
Criteria
1.
The area should contain a representative sample of natural regions,
features, or scenery where plant and
animal species, habitats and geomorphologic sites are of special spiritual
scientific educational recreational and tourist significant.
2.
The area should be large enough to contain one or more entire ecosystems
not materially altered by current human occupation or exploitation.
Category 3: NATURAL MONUMENTS
v Protected
area, managed mainly for conservation of specific natural features
Criteria
1.
The area should contain one or more features of outstanding
significance, example waterfalls, caves, crators, sand dunes, marine features, unique or representative flora and
founa, archeological sites etc.
2.
The area should be large enough to protect the integrity of the feature
and its immediately surroundings.
Category 4: HABITATS OR SPECIES MANAGEMENT AREAS
v Protected
are managed mainly for conservation
through management intervention
Criteria
1.
The area should play an important role in the protection of nature and
survival of species.
2.
The area should be one where the protection of the habitat is essential
to the wellbeing of nationally or locally important flora or to residents or
migratory founa.
3.
The conservation of these habitats and species should depend upon active
intervention by the management authority.
4.
The size of the area should depend on the habitat requirements of the
species to be protected and may range from relatively small area to a very
extensive area.
Category 5: PROTECTED LANDSCAPE OR SEASCAPE
v Protected
area managed mainly for conservation and recreation
1.
The area should posses a landscape
or coastal and seascape of high scenic quality with diverse associated
habitats of flora and founa. It should manifest the unique or traditional land
use patterns and social organizations as evidenced in human settlements, local customs
livelihoods and beliefs.
2.
These should provide opportunities for public enjoyment through
recreation and tourism within the normal lifestyle an economic activities
Category 6: MANAGED RESOURCE PROTECTED AREA
v Protected
area managed mainly for resources protection for sustainable use of natural
ecosystem
1.
The area should be atleast 2/3 (two thirds) in a natural condition:
although it may also contain limited areas of modified ecosystems.
Large commercial plantations would not be
appropriate for inclusion in the managed resources protected area.
2. The area should be large
enough to absorb sustainable resource uses without detriment to its overall
long term natural values.
PREPARING MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR PROTECTED AREA
Management plan
- Is a written document
that guides the management process of a particular protected area/ National
parks.
What is the all about?
- It describes the physical
biological and cultural features of the area within the local regional and
national levels.
- It describes the
appropriate use of a particular protected are (National Park)
i.e. It
lists / shows in a chronological order all the activities to be carried out so
as to achieve the proposed or agreed management goals.
WHY DO WE NEED A MANAGEMENT PLAN?
(RATIONALE FOR MANAGEMENT PLAN)
1.
It helps to guide the activities and organize the approach in managing
the National Parks (protected area)
2.
To avoid the mistakes of the past and apply successful experiences from
other management plans.
3.
To ensure economies by reducing duplication, so as to facilitate cost
effective analysis and plot a logical approach to the future.
4.
To ensure proper allocation of resources interims of staff and
equipment.
5.
To ensure public and enhance cooperation among community/ local,
non-governmental and governmental agencies.
i.e. Good public relations and cooperation among
stakeholders benefactors
benefactories
6.
To achieve the balance between conservation goals and human needs
through the use of resources within the protected areas (National Parks).
STEPS IN PREPARING THE MANAGEMENT PLAN
1.
Identify the basic purpose of the area
- The planner formulates
the purpose based on the national conservational objectives, policies and general legislations with
regards to six categories of protected
area.
2.
To define the objectives and goods of the management
- This can be done by
considering the categories of objectives namely:
a.
Environmental or resources management objectives
v
Conservation objectives
v Human
needs objectives
b.
Visitors management objectives
v
Recreational issues
c.
Operations management objectives
v
Facilities
v Staffs
etc.
3.
Assess the available resources/ baseline resources
- Seek the basic
information about
v Resources
available
v
Topography (Areas features/ structures)
v Soils
v Climate
etc.
- This gives the general
background information of the area, then draw map of the area.
- During assessment of the
available resources, try your best to cover the following information.
v
Biological resources
v Physical
resources
v The
interactions between the resources
- Also look at
v Cultural features
v Their
location, quality and the distribution etc.
(iii) Limitations constraints in managing the
particular area
Look at physical, political, social constraints
Legal, human, financial constraints
(iv) Land and other resources use in the area
- Describe and map all the
uses especially that may cause changes in the environment
i.e. (The uses that may constraint the basic
management goals).
(v) The basic infrastructure in the area
(vi) Regional influences and integration of the area
v Tran
boundary resources etc.
4.
To analyse and refine the information
- Look at the information
that you have
- Look at the management
objectives so as to see whether you can gain the objectives, given the
constraints within the body of information that
you have.
- Refine the objectives;
sometimes you may decide to drop some depending on the constraints you have
5.
Define the regional land use zones
- These are the zones of
influence and should include specific areas that may have the influence in the
protected area.
Example: Buffer zones – (zones of trsnition)
v Water sheds
v Wildlife
corridors (passage way of animals)
6.
Define the area’s management zones
- Divide the area into
smaller units according to the management goals and uses
- Each zone should have its
own management objectives.
- This process of zoning
helps to achieve the specific objectives for which the area is managed.
7.
Implementation and evaluation
- Set the schedule for
implementation
- Estimate the costs before
the actual management begans
- Review and approve the
plan through consultations
- Put the plan into effect
within the limitations of the funds, human resources and time.
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND REGIMES
Introduction
The concept of property rights was developed by an
English theorist John Locke (1632 – 1704). The theory was so detailed and it is
on private ownership of property. According to
Locke, in the
original state of
nature, land (used
here in a general sense
to include bodies of water) and
its resources are un owned, but every person (human being) owns his or her own
body and the labour produced by the body. When a person mixes her or his
labour (which is
privately owned) with
unowned land or resources,
then that person comes to own the land or the resources
derived from it. Thus by mixing the owned labour of the body with the unowned
material objects of nature come to be owned labour of the body with unowned
material objects of nature, the objects of nature come to be owned by owner of
the labour. A settler, who goes into wilderness, clears the land, builds a
house and plants crops and thereby becomes a property owner. This scenario tend
to ignore any indigenous people who may
have occupied the land previously and it accords property right only to humans
and ignores the fauna and flora in the area concerned.
Property rights
Property rights combine the accessibility ownership
and utilization of the natural resources available. All economic goods have a
property rights attribute. This attribute has three broad components:
i. The right to use the good
ii. The right to earn income from the good
iii. The right to transfer the good to others
Property right regimes involve the arrangements on which
natural resources users, either groups or individual, have the rights and
duties towards a particular resource. An important feature of property rights is the ability to exclude others from
using certain resources, this has an influence on the management of resources.
Property rights over natural resources
should provide a good stand for all individuals without segregation as
stipulated in the available natural resources, policies.
A property
right is the exclusive authority to determine how a resource is used, whether
that resource is owned by government or by individuals. The property right regime should express the
strengths and the bandle of rights an individual owns in terms of
accessibility, ownership, control and utilization.
Importance of property rights
1.
Help us to understand the rights and uses of resources
2.
Help to provide tips on how to manage the resources
3.
To understand- who owns controls the resources
4.
To predict the consequences on the resources available.
Types of property right regimes
- The types of property
rights in natural resources include
i.
Public property
- Under this, the general public
has the right to utilize the natural resources available within defined
arrangement.
- The management of the
natural resources under public property regime/ form is the responsibility of
the government or public sector.
Have a critical look towards the natural resources
available in Tanzania
Example
Water
Ocean
Lakes
- Who owns these
Rivers
- Who emphasizes over the management (cultivating near etc.)
Minerals =II=
ii.
Private Property
- Here the individuals have
the right to own and control the natural resources
- His regime comes with an
element of excludability and such rights are defined by law and can easily be
transferable into gods and services
- Usually the title deal
(the document that show the evidence of somebody’s legal rights to property)
- The management of natural
resources under this regime is the responsibility of individuals or Private
companies operating within the limit set by the policies and laws.
iii.
Common Property
- A group (community
members) share the right towards maintaining accessing and using particular
natural resources
- This means that the
defined members of a certain group (with clarified criteria to belong in a
group) are given the right to own and control the resources.
- Therefore, non-members
are not allowed to use the resources
Consider the tragedy of the commons; The individuals
attempt to exploit the resources of a group, but only harm themselves because
everyone adopts the same strategy and resources are uniformly depleted.
- The management of
natural resources in under the local
leadership of the group
The community institution determines access and
control of resources according to customary laws, norms, traditions and rules-that
govern the community.
iv.
Open access/ Common pool property
- Under this form,
everybody has the right to access and use particular resources available
There is no specific rights set to a specific group or community or individual, but rather
everybody has the right to use and manage
a particular natural
resources
- Therefore, the
management is under those who are using that resources.
- In most cases, the por
make extensive use of the resources
because no one has exclusive rights.
- The materials obtained
from common pool/open access properties consists of a wide range of items for personal use or sale
Examples, Food, Fodder, manure taboos, medical,
plants, honey, building materials, sea weeds, shellfish etc.
NR – MANAGEMENT REGIME
- These are four types of
management regimes namely
i.
State management regime
ii.
Local management regime
iii.
Private management regime
iv.
Community management regime
i.
STATE MANAGEMENT REGIME
- This include executive,
legislative and judiciary with which all the rules and laws are passed supreme and interpreted to govern the use and management of the
natural resources.
- This management regime
includes: Judiciary, beaucracy, regional forces and local government.
- Therefore, the management
(ownership, finance and control) of the natural resources is determined by the
state with its assisting parties.
ii.
LOCAL MANAGEMENT REGIME
- Here, the communities are
increasingly involved in the management of natural resources under the concept
of participatory management.
- The communities
participate in planning, decision making, implementation and evaluation of
communal based management of natural resources
- The communities share benefits from
the proposed management approaches.
- This regime is much used
in wildlife and forest conservation and management.
The communities play a key role in management of the
resources jointly with the government which joins the community in the
management process.
- Community members help
in patrolling and reporting the poachers etc.
iii.
PRIVATE MANAGEMENT REGIME
- It is more feasible/
possible particularly where safe market institutions and private property
traditions exist
- Under this regime, profit
motivation can ignore public interest in the conservation of natural resources.
- The management of
the natural resources may be focused to
the economic/ profit interest
i.e. The owners may decide to maximize profit
without considering the sustainable use of the particular natural
resources.
iv.
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT REGIME
- The community members
(community institutions) with their leaders, basing to the norms and traditions
involve themselves fully in natural resource management process
- Community based
organizations can be formed to help mobilize people in the community to manage
the natural resources available for the benefits to all community members.
PRIORITIES AND STRATEGIES FOR ACTION IN THE NATURAL
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
In
developing countries (Tanzania)
i.
On Population growth
1.
To launch a time bound national campaigns for population stabilization
with the small family size as a social responsible objective.
2.
To increase support for female education employment and increase social
security programmes (sure of old security)
3.
To increase access of the means of
family planning and healthcare facilities
4.
Added incentives interms of family planning
5.
Environmental unhygienic
prevention and control of communicable
diseases to increase the probability of
children / people’s survival
6.
Provision of health education to people.
ii.
On natural resources
a. Land and water resources
1.
To have an integrated land and
water management approach for sustainable food, production, animal husbandry
and other activities
2.
To have the classification,
zoning and appointment of land for designated issue such as agriculture,
forestry grassland, industrial activities, catchment areas, human settlements
and watersheds
3.
Enactment of the laws for appropriate land and water uses so as to
protect the resources from degradation
4.
Protection of land near water bodies and prevention of construction
activities along these areas
5.
To ensure clear property right regimes that ensures equitable access to
responsibility for sustainable land
and water resources.
6.
To encourage and improve the traditional knowledge on land and water
resources management.
b.
The atmosphere
1.
To use clean fuels and clean technologies
Eg. Avoid, high use of coal
Nuclear
power
2.
To have energy efficient devices for air and noise pollution control
3.
Proper location of projects to minimize the adverse impact on people and
environment
4.
To develop the coping modernisms for future climatic changes as the
result of increased emission of Co2 and other green house gases.
c.
Biodiversity
1.
Intensification of surveys of biological resources of the country
including the island and marine
ecosystems
e.g.
Information on the distribution patterns of species and status of the
species
2.
Conservation of the biological
diversity through a network of protected areas including
·
Marine reserves, national parks and game reserves, wetlands etc.
3.
Conservation of micro-fauna and micro-flora including the revival of
biological potential lands.
4. Protection and sustainable use
of plant and animal genetic resources through appropriate laws and practices.
5.
Maintenance of corridors between national parks, forest and other
protected areas
Iko vzuri
ReplyDeleteNapata shida kuatambua approaches za natural resources management Ni zipi ingawa source zingine zinazungumzia top down and bottom up approaches.
ReplyDelete