With clear example from English language semine influeximal and delivation Critically elaborate different between the above not less six

-

Definition of derivation
Is the formation of a word from another word or base (as by the addition of a usually no inflectional affix)"Strategize" was formed by derivation from "strategy."
Morphological derivation, in linguistics, is the process of forming a new word from an existing word, often by adding a prefix or suffix, such as -ness or un-. For example, happiness and unhappy derive from the root word happy.
It is differentiated from inflection, which is the modification of a word to form different grammatical categories without changing its core meaning: determines, determining, and determined are from the root determine.The difference between influeximal and  delivation can be explain interms of  meaning, change of category, regularity of meaning, productivity, position in the template, obligatoriness and relevance to syntax.
Derivational patterns
Derivational morphology often involves the addition of a derivational suffix or other affix. Such an affix usually applies to words of one lexical category (part of speech) and changes them into words of another such category. For example, the English derivational suffix -ly changes adjectives into adverbs (slow → slowly).
Here are examples of English derivational patterns and their suffixes:
Adjective-to-noun: -ness (slow → slowness)
Adjective-to-verb: -ise (modern → modernise) in British English or -ize (final → finalize) in American English and Oxford spelling
Adjective-to-adjective: -ish (red → reddish)
Adjective-to-adverb: -ly (personal → personally)
Noun-to-adjective: -al (recreation → recreational)
Noun-to-verb: -fy (glory → glorify)
       Inflectional morphemes do not create separate words. They merely modify the word in which they occur in order to indicate grammatical properties such as plurality, as the {-s} of magazines does, or past tense, as the {ed} of  babecued does. English has eight inflectional morphemes, which we will describe below.
We can regard the root of a word as the morpheme left over when all the derivational and inflectional morphemes have been removed. For example, in immovability, {im-}, {-abil}, and {-ity} are all derivational morphemes, and when we remove them we are left with {move}, which cannot be further divided into meaningful pieces, and so must be the word’s root.
We must distinguish between a word’s root and the forms to which affixes are attached. In moveable, {-able} is attached to {move}, which we’ve determined is the word’s root. However, {im-} is attached to moveable, not to {move} (there is no word immove), but moveable is not a root. Expressions to which affixes are attached are called bases. While roots may be bases, bases are not always roots
 The following are different between influeximal and  delivation
Derivational morphemes are added to forms to create separate words: {‑er} is a derivational suffix whose addition turns a verb into a noun, usually meaning the person or thing that performs the action denoted by the verb. For example, {paint}+{-er} creates painter, one of whose meanings is “someone who paints.
.Derivational affixes do not necessarily alter the lexical category; they may change merely the meaning of the base and leave the category unchanged.
 A prefix (write → re-write; lord → over-lord) rarely changes the lexical category in English. The prefix un- applies to adjectives (healthy → unhealthy) and some verbs (do → undo) but rarely to nouns. A few exceptions are the derivational prefixes en- and be-. En- (replaced by em- before labials) is usually a transitive marker on verbs, but it can also be applied to adjectives and nouns to form transitive verbs: circle (verb) → encircle (verb) but rich (adj) → enrich (verb), large (adj) → enlarge (verb), rapture (noun) → enrapture (verb), slave (noun) → enslave (verb).
Derivation occurs without any change to the word, such as in the conversion of the noun breakfast into the verb to breakfast, it's known as conversion, or zero derivation.
Derivation that results in a noun may be called nominalization. It may involve the use of an affix (such as with employ → employee), or it may occur via conversion (such as with the derivation of the noun run from the verb to run). In contrast, a derivation resulting in a verb may be called verbalization (such as from the noun butter to the verb to butter).
Derivation can be contrasted with inflection, in that derivation produces a new word (a distinct lexeme), whereas inflection produces grammatical variants of the same word.
Derivation and other types of word formation
Derivation can be contrasted with other types of word formation such as compounding. For full details see Word formation.
 Derivational affixes are bound morphemes – they are meaningful units, but can only normally occur when attached to another word. In that respect, derivation differs from compounding by which free morphemes are combined (lawsuit, Latin professor). It also differs from inflection in that inflection does not create new lexemes but new word forms (table → tables; open → opened)
Inflection applies in more or less regular patterns to all members of a part of speech (for example, nearly every English verb adds -s for the third person singular present tense), while derivation follows less consistent patterns (for example, the nominal zing suffix -ity can be used with the adjectives modern and dense, but not with open or strong). However, it is important to note that derivations and inflections can share homonyms, that being, morphemes that have the same sound, but not the same meaning. For example, when the affix -er, is added to an adjective, as in small-er, it acts as an inflection, but when added to a verb, as in cook-er, it acts as a derivation
Derivational change that takes place without the addition of a bound morpheme (such as the use of the noun impact as a verb) is called zero derivation or conversion.
Derivational morphology studies the principles governing the construction of new words, without reference to the specific grammatical role a word might play in a sentence. In the formation of drinkable from drink, or disinfect from infect, for example, we see the formation of new words, each with its own grammatical properties.
Derivation versus Inflection
Morphology may be divided into derivation--rules that form a new word out of old words, like duckfeathers and unkissable--and inflection--rules that modify a word to fit its role in a sentence, what language teachers call conjugation and declension
"The distinction between inflectional morphology and derivational morphology is an ancient one. Fundamentally, it is a matter of the means used to create new lexemes (derivational affixes among other processes) and those used to mark the role of the lexeme in a particular sentence (accidence, inflectional morphology). . . .
"It seems that although we probably can maintain a distinction between inflectional and derivational morphology relatively well in English--albeit with certain problematical cases which do not invalidate the fundamental notion--the distinction is not helpful to us in understanding any other aspects of the morphology of English. The classification might be useful in terms of typology, but does not throw much light on the behavior of English morphological processes."(Laurie Bauer, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag, The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford University Press, 2013
Changes to Meaning and Word Class: Prefixes and Suffixes
"Derivational prefixes do not normally alter the word class of the base word; that is, a prefix is added to a noun to form a new noun with a different meaning:

Derivational suffixes, on the other hand, usually change both the meaning and the word class; that is, a suffix is often added to a verb or adjective to form a new noun with a different meaning: patient
trial: retrial
noun--friend: friendship"
(Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad, and Geoffrey Leech, Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English.(Longman, 2002)
CONCLUTION
Derivation can be contrasted with inflection, in that derivation produces a new word (a distinct lexeme), whereas inflection produces grammatical variants of the same word

"The distinction between inflectional morphology and derivational morphology is an ancient one. Fundamentally, it is a matter of the means used to create new lexemes (derivational affixes among other processes) and those used to mark the role of the lexeme in a particular sentence (accidence, inflectional morphology). . . .
"It seems that although we probably can maintain a distinction between inflectional and derivational morphology relatively well in English--albeit with certain problematical cases which do not invalidate the fundamental notion--the distinction is not helpful to us in understanding any other aspects of the morphology of English. The classification might be useful in terms of typology, but does not throw much light on the behavior of English morphological processes."(Laurie Bauer, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag, The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford University Press, 2013

Derivation can be contrasted with other types of word formation such as compounding. For full details see Word formation.









1. Meaning
2. Change of category
3. Regularity of meaning
4. Productivity
5. Position in the template
6. Obligatoriness
7. Relevance to syntax

                                                            REFERENCES
Crystal, David (1999): The Penguin Dictionary of Language, Penguin Books, England.
Jump Sobin, Nicholas (2011). Syntactic Analysis the Basics. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 17–18. ISBN 978-1-4443-3895-9
(David Crystal, How Language Works. Overlook Press, 2005
(Laurie Bauer, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag, The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford University Press, 2013
Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad, and Geoffrey Leech, Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman, 2002
(Geert Booij, The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford University Press, 2005


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

International Law

-
    International Law The body of law that governs the legal relations between or among states or nations.To qualify as a subject under the traditional definition of international law, a state had to be sovereign: It needed a territory, a population, a government, and the ability to engage in diplomatic or foreign relations. States within the United States, provinces, and cantons were not considered subjects of international law, because they lacked the legal authority to engage in foreign relations. In addition, individuals did not fall within the definition of subjects that enjoyed rights and obligations under international law. so there are two types of international law which are public and private international law. Public International Law: Public International laws have been designed to examine the relationships between the countries and states and they govern the binding rules of the international community to avoid any dispute. Public International laws genera...
Read more
-
Image
 HARMORAPA   Since Artist Harmorapa has entered the music to start to be compared to an artist Harmonize, every time the rapper has been entered on the 'headline' wide and discussed by many artists the biggest in the country, others were pleased with his actions while others mocked him and see that he deserves to be a musician. He started as a joke has to be compared with the bright label WCB minor then starts to penetrate into the ears of love entertainment. We are referring here HarmoRapa  is predicted to major in music of bongo Fleva Time here. His first single not divide a passport is placed on the map and start to be known, though it did not properly market. This Time around HarmoRapa has come up with another hit in Town goes by the name "kiboko ya mabishoo" Many thought if Jokes but relatives had become serious now after signing a deal with a large imaging technology bongo Slides Visual less Mx Carter. Also contusion with producer p funk ...
Read more

KATIBA YA KIKUNDI

-
KATIBA YA VACK GROUP SEHEME YA 1. UTANGULIZI 1 JINA LA KIKUNDI VACK GROUP IBARA YA PILI: 2: TAFSIRI YA MANENO MBALIMBALI  2.1 Kikundi kina mkusanyikon wa watu 2.2 Wanachama wa kikundi wana mtazamo moja  2.3 Wanadhamira moja katika kujenga taifa IBARA YA 3. UTANGULIZI Wanachama wa kikundi cha VACK GROUP tumejipanga kufanya kazi kwa ushirikiano ili kufikia malengo yetu IBARA YA 4. KATIBA Katiba ni kanuni ya nchi au taasisi iliyopangwa kwa makubaliano maalumu yanayosimamia sheria kufuata miongozo yake bila kwenda kinyume.Kwenda kinyume cha hapo ni kosa. IBARA YA 5. JINA LA KIKUNDI Kikundi kinaitwa VACK GROUP  IBARA YA 6. LUGHA RASMI YA KIKUNDI Lugha rasmi ya kikundi ni Kiswahili na kingereza. IBARA YA 7. OFISI KUU Makao makuu ya kikundi yatakua ndani ya Mbinga mjini. IBARA YA 8. ENEO LA UTENDAJI WA KAZI  Itakuwa ndani ya wilaya ya mbinga IBARA YA 9. KANUNI ZA KIMAADILI  9.1 Kuheshimiana wenyewe kwa weny...
Read more