INTRODUCTION
Language
change (or linguistic change) describes the variation over time in human
languages - on phonetic, morphological, syntactic, semantic, or pragmatic
level. Phenomena of linguistic change can be on various natures and emerge and
evolve by quite different circumstances, influences and or dynamics. Or
language change is the phenomenon by which permanent alteration are made in
features and the use of language over time. All natural languages change and
language change affects all areas of language use (William l, 2007). There are
two model of language change which is family tree and wave mode; these models
have been discussed below.
Family tree model
The family
tree model is closely linked to the comparative method,
which was developed by the Neo-grammarians in 1860-1880 (Crowley and Bowern,
2010). The comparative method allows us to establish relatedness between
languages that evolved from a common proto-language.
This is done based on regular sound correspondences between
the languages that are examined. These languages are then presented in a family
tree which shows how each of the languages belonging to the language family
descended from the proto-language, thereby splitting into branches. This model has served as the foundation not
only of language classification, but of language change in general
Basic assumptions of the family tree model
The family tree model and the corresponding comparative
method rely on several assumptions which I shall now review based on Campbell
(2004):
Sound change is regular:
This is called the Neogrammarian Hypothesis and
was formulated by Karl Brugmann and Hermann Osthoff. This means that whenever
sound change occurs it occurs everywhere in the language and admits no
exceptions.
Language change occurs by the diversification of language alone: A single language splits into several dialects that later become distinct languages. Once a split of a language into dialects occurs there is no further interaction between the branches. Therefore, each of the new dialects or languages develops further autonomously.
Language change occurs by the diversification of language alone: A single language splits into several dialects that later become distinct languages. Once a split of a language into dialects occurs there is no further interaction between the branches. Therefore, each of the new dialects or languages develops further autonomously.
Any proto-language had a single
form only: Whatever is reconstructed for the proto-language was
invariably used by its speech community.
Wave model
Wave
model is a model of language change in which a new language features
(innovation) or a new combination of language features spread from its original
affecting a gradually expanding cluster of dialects. The model was intended as
a substitute for the tree model which did not seem to be already to explain the
existence of some features, especially in Germanic language by descent former proto-language.
At its most ambition it is a wholesale replacement for the tree model of
language. During the 20th c the wave model had little acceptance as
model for language change overall except for certain cases, such as the study
of dialect continua and among historical linguist, due, to the shortcoming of
the tree model (Campbell L 2004).
Wave
model accommodate distribution of
innovation in intersected patterns such as configuration is typical of dialect
continua that is historical situation in which dialect share innovations with
different neighbors simultaneous in such a way that the genealogical subgroups
they define from an intersected patterns this explain the popularity of the
wave model in studies of dialectology.
A
diagram showing wave model innovations
The circles are to be regarded as
diachronic. That is they increase in diameter over time like the concentric
wave on a water surface struck by stone. The background represents a dialect
continuum of no language boundaries. The circles are stable dialects,
characters over bundles of characters that have been innovated that have
becoming more stable over originally small portion of continuum for social
political-reason, these circles spread from their small centre of maximum
effectiveness like wave becoming less effective and then dissipating at maximum
time and distance from the centre. Language is not regarded as impermanent set
of speech habits that result from and prevail in the intersection of the
circles. The most conservative language is represented by the area not covered
by the circles.
By
conclusion language is always changing , the changes goes across space and
across social group this is because language varies according to time, there
are many factor for language change other factors are like prestige for example
the use of gotten rather than got.
REFERENCES
Campbell, L. (2004). Historical Linguistics.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Crowley, T. And Bowern, C. (2010). An Introduction to Historical Linguistics. Oxford:
Oxford University Press
Comments
Post a Comment