Why is it important to define population as specifically as possible

FACULTY OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT: EDUCATIONAL
FOUNDATIONS
COURSE TITLE: RESEARCH METHOD IN EDUCATION
COURSE CODE: RM 211
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: FR. FESTUS
NATURE OF WORK: GROUP ASSIGNMENT
GROUP NO. 12
SUBMISSION DATE: 26/11/2019
NO.
|
NAME
|
REGISTRATION
NO.
|
SIGNATURE
|
01
|
NEREUS
ZEPHRINE
|
STE/BAED/164424
|
|
02
|
ANASTASIA
COSMAS NGONYANI
|
STE/BAED/164100
|
|
03
|
JUMAA MWAKIRI
NZORI
|
STE/BAED/164298
|
|
04
|
EMMANUELI TIMBALALA
ABDALLAH
|
STE/BAED/164085
|
|
05
|
BINKIWA
KALIWANJE MUSSA
|
STE/BAED/164317
|
|
06
|
IDDI SELEMANI
MOHAMEDI
|
STE/BAED/164478
|
|
07
|
MARIA B. KOMBA
|
STE/BAED/164359
|
|
08
|
MARY B. MSIGWA
|
STE/BAED/164134
|
|
09
|
PETER WENDELIN
MHANJE
|
STE/BAED/164407
|
|
10
|
VUMILIA ATANAEL
KOMBA
|
STE/BAED/164144
|
|
TASK: Why is it important to define population
as specifically as possible
INTRODUCTION
Population specification is a requirement in the
documentation of both qualitative and quantitative studies. Moreover, the
concepts of general, target and accessible population often apply to both
designs. However, population specification is not guided by the same principles
in qualitative and quantitative studies (Creswell, 2003; Denzin & Lincoln,
2011). For instance, qualitative studies focus on relatively few participants
who have the ability to describe their experiences and/or knowledge with
respect to some research questions or phenomenon (Baškarada, 2014; Creswell,
2003).
Population in
research is generally a large collection of individuals or objects that is the
main focus of scientific query. It is for the benefit of the population that
researches done. Population can be categorized into three categories which are
general population, accessible population, and target population.
The following are the factors for why is it
important to define population as specifically as possibbe
To
apply different protocols and criteria in selecting population members. This
being the case, the concepts of general, target and accessible population would
not be the same for qualitative and quantitative studies. There is no doubt
that some studies (Banerjee & Chaudhury, 2010; Mahoney & Goertz, 2006)
have discussed these concepts in both qualitative and quantitative contexts;
but little emphasis has been placed on qualitative study, particularly those
associated with large study populations. This situation is deemed a major
problem given the increasing recognition for qualitative research approaches in
academia
To
apply a set of criteria to select participants, without specifying the target
and accessible populations may result in oversight of the most eligible and
convenient participant group and may not allow the qualitative researcher to
reach “the most appropriate” sample. It is therefore advisable for the
researcher to think of what should be the selection criteria for determining
each of the target and accessible populations after specifying the general
population. As indicated earlier therefore, the specification of the target and
accessible populations is necessary if the study population is large.
To identify any individuals who are unwilling
to participate in the study or will not be available at the time of data
collection. If the researcher finds out that the target population is small
enough to select participants from and all its members are both willing and
available to participate in the study, there is no need specifying the
accessible population. The accessible population is reached after taking out all
individuals of the target population who will or may not participate or who
cannot be accessed at the study period (Bartlett et al., 2001).
The researcher focuses on participants who can
best share experiences and thoughts to address the qualitative research goal.
To determine the target population therefore, the researcher ought to Population
in research is generally a large collection of individuals or objects that is
the main focus of scientific query. It is for the benefit of the population
that researches done.
To identify
and eliminate individuals who may not have the ability to share experiences and
thoughts in ample clarity and depth. It is therefore at the stage of specifying
the target population that the researcher considers factors such as ability to
recall and relate to real-life experiences as well as the capacity to logically
reason and communicate thoughts in an appropriate language. As a result,
education and experience in the appropriate field (i.e., healthcare) would have
to be considered in selecting members of the target population.
To
provide information of higher importance in qualitative studies as compared to
quantitative studies. For instance, some quantitative studies (e.g., pure
experiments) only require participants to receive some treatments.
Cross-sectional quantitative designs also only require participants to check
each item of certain measurement scales and thus do not demand much of their
writing and speaking abilities. Qualitative studies, on the other hand, require
their participants to deeply reason and speak/write extensively. So, attributes
relating to education, experience and communication skills more strongly
influence the determination of the target population in qualitative enquiry. .
The accessible population could be argued to be the same for both
qualitative and quantitative studies. For both designs, members of the
accessible population are individual who are eligible to participate in the
study but are unwilling to participate or would not be available at the time of
data collection. However, unlike quantitative studies, qualitative designs take
much more of participants’ time in brainstorming interviews and other data
collection situations (Creswell, 2003; Pernecky, 2016). Participating in
qualitative studies is also often perceived more burdensome by participants
(Creswell, 2003; Williams, 2007). As a result, members of the target population
are less likely to agree to participate in a qualitative study. So, willingness
to participate in a study by members of the target population is likely lower
for qualitative designs.
The
general population is characteristically crude in the sense that it often
contains participants whose inclusion in the study would violate the research
goal, assumptions, and/or context. With respect to our scenario, members of the
general population are health workers in all healthcare institutions in
Jackson. Thus, every employee in these institutions who directly or indirectly
contributes to healthcare delivery is a health worker and is therefore a member
of the general population. By virtue of one of our research contexts, however,
not every health worker can participate in the study.
Refinement
of the general population is necessary in many instances like ours, and it
would be executed by taking all individuals (i.e., from the general population)
whose involvement in the study violates the research goal, assumption or
context. The part of the general population left after its refinement is termed
target population, which is defined as the group of individuals or participants
with the specific attributes of interest and relevance (Bartlett et al., 2001;
Creswell, 2003). The target population is more refined as compared to the
general population on the basis of containing no attribute that controverts a
research assumption, context or goal.
Therefore,
Specification of the accessible population is a precursor of sampling. Until
the accessible population is well identified and understood, any attempt to
sample may lead to unwanted outcomes such as having inaccessible individuals in
the sample, and having a considerable number of such individuals in the sample
will lead to the generation of incomplete data and failure to satisfy sample
size requirements. More noteworthy is the fact that specification of the study
population has different implications for sampling in qualitative nquiry.
REFFERENCE
Comments
Post a Comment