The third philosopher
The third philosopher who is dear to us is Emmanuel
Levinas, who is known as the philosopher of the face and who wrote the apt
phrase: "The face of the other presents me with an ethical
imperative". In fact, he is completely on the same line as Buber and Ricoeur
and he fixates the encounter in seeing the face of the other. This face presents
us with a choice: either I ignore it or I enter into a relationship with the
other. Or go even further and feel responsible for the other's well-being.
Levinas likes to refer to the primal story of Cain and Abel, in which God ask
Cain the ultimate question: "Where is your brother?" to which Cain
replies with an equally ultimate answer: "Am I my brother's keeper?"
According to the author, this is the tragedy of mankind: the fact that he denies
being his brother's keeper, that he considers the other as a competitor wh+
o limits his absolute freedom, which is why he wants
to eliminate him, which Cain did in the end. Levinas states that we can never turn
away from the face of the other even though I am at liberty to do so. My being
a neighbor precedes my absolute freedom so that i do have to show consideration
for the face of the other. This is where a very topical issue sounds about
freedom being mad absolute, and with freedom, autonomy and self-determination
being made absolute. Indeed, we are free but it is always a freedom connection;
in connection to ourselves, to our environment, to the other, and to the Other.
Having arrived at this conclusion, it is a matter of looking at the degree of
this 'consideration' we want to reach. This can range from simply respecting
that the other is there, which is an absolute minimum, overturning to the other
with interest, to actually laboring in the cause of the others welfare. This is
where Levinas starts his well-known ethical imperative' and invites us place every
encounter under it. Ethics call on us to always strive for the greatest human
dignity possible, again a term coined by Ricoeur: 'lemeilleur humain possible'.
Translated to the encounter with the face, this means that we should ask ourselves
whenever we see a face how we can help the other the best for them to grow in
their human dignity. Levinas takes a big step by speaking of an 'epiphany', a revelation
of the face. In the naked face of the other, we descry the infinite; the face transcends
as a reflection of the Infinite. The other is not just the object of a look but
becomes a revelation of the Infinite
This is where Levinas grazes the view of Christ who
said: "As you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it
to me" (Mt25:40). t is the 'Infinite', the divine reflection in the face
of the other, Christ himself, we encounter in the other, who urges us to absolutely
respect and absolutely love the other, every other without distinction, and to
always ask ourselves how we can take on our responsibility for his growth
towards a greater human dignity.
Every encounter holds a task, a radical task at
that. Every time we deny it or perform it in adequately, we affect the essence
of our humanity, which always equals being a neighbor, and we deny our humanity
itself. This radical responsibility for the welfare of the other is just as
radically part of my existence as a human being. Levinas stresses that there
can be no distinction between the people we encounter and therefore every
encounter calls for total nonviolence. My attitude towards the other must not
depend on the attitude of the other. It should be radically marked by
nonviolence, respect, love, taking up our responsibility to lead the other to a
greater human dignity. This is his 'ethical imperative': it is an imperative,
an obligation, not a free choice!
And so, we conclude this first part, and from a
philosophical standpoint with a link with theology, of course, referring to the
radicalness of the commandment of love that is ever present as a perspective
and a direction indicator we can state that our humanity always expresses
itself as being a neighbor and that we must focus all of our attention on the
quality of the encounter with the neighbor, every single neighbor without
distinction. The encounter in vitesus to dedicate ourselves to the other, to
his welfare, in service. Service always originates in the encounter.
Comments
Post a Comment