Elaborate the significance epistemological theories in educational and in teaching profession
Elaborate the significance epistemological
theories in educational and in teaching profession
Introduction
Education
is a social discipline. Epistemology is about the foundations of knowledge. You
would think they cross paths, but often they don’t.Educators like to ‘gloss
over the difficult parts’. Epistemology is about finding a solution no matter
if it is easy or difficult. They are like rhetorical opposites The way we teach in higher education will be driven
primarily by our beliefs or even more importantly, by the commonly agreed
consensus within an academic discipline about what constitutes valid knowledge
in the subject area. The nature of knowledge centres on the question of how we
know what we know. What makes us believe that something is ‘true’? Questions of
this kind are epistemological in nature. Hofer and Pintrich (1997) state:
‘Epistemology is a branch of
philosophy concerned with the nature and justification of knowledge.’
The Significance
Epistemological Theories In Educational
And In Teaching Profession.
Awareness
Epistemological
beliefs are arguably
important to both
academic and applied
psychology. Development of scientific reasoning skills has been
recommended as a central goal of psychology education (Cranney et al., 2008;
Halonen et al., 2003). Similarly, codes of ethics state that applying
psychological knowledge requires awareness of the need for ongoing learning
and limitations of
existing knowledge (Australian
Psychological Society, 2007).
A critical perspective
regarding new knowledge
requires relatively
sophisticated EB (Halonen
et al., 2003).
Therefore, for graduates
to apply psychological knowledge ethically, technical
skills need to be
accompanied by skills for discovering, interpreting, and
integrating relevant evidence,
which involves well developed Epistemological beliefs
source
of knowledge .Elby
& Hammer, 2001,
for critique of
“consensus” views of EB
sophistication).
Similarly, viewing the source
of knowledge as
“experts” would be considered less
sophisticated than viewing
the source as
an array of
evidence potentially varying in quality,
support for or against a proposition, and
replicability.
Structure of EB and boundaries with other
constructs continue to be
debated (Chinn, Buckland, &
Samarapungavan, 2011), but reviews have consistently supported utility of
EB for understanding
and improving teaching
and learning, due
to associations between
EB and both
learning and motivation
(Bendixen & Rule,
2004; Greene,
Muis,
& Pieschl, 2010;
Hofer, 2001; Hofer
& Pintrich, 1997;
King & Kitchener,
2004;
Schommer-Aikins, 2004). Potential
cultural differences in EB have also
been
explored (Braten, Gil, Stromso, &
Vidal-Abarca, 2009; Khine, 2008).
Measurement
Perry
(1968) used interviews.
A widely used
format is the
semi-structured Reflective
Judgment Interview (King & Kitchener, 2004).
The student is questioned about
several controversial topics
(e.g., the accuracy of
news reporting). Questions include
the student’s beliefs,
their certainty about
those beliefs, and
how people including
experts may disagree
on this topic.
Internal consistency is
high (median Cronbach’s alphas around .80; King &
Kitchener, 2004).
Significance of
Epistemological Beliefs 9
pronounced difference found among
students at higher year levels
(unpublished data
from Wood, Kitchener & Jensen, cited by King
& Kitchener, 2004). Students’
EB change with
time in psychology
programs. Focus groups conducted with beginning, second
and third year psychology students
in the United Kingdom (UK)
showed that beginning
students viewed psychology as
being open-ended and
creative (suggesting
relativist and constructivist epistemologies), but also as
constituting a body of
knowledge (suggesting a dualist epistemology; Wallwork,
Mahoney, & Mason, 2006). Second and
third-year students referred to the discipline’s
complexity,
with this being
viewed more positively
by third years.
This implied
greater acceptance of relativism by advanced
students.
Significance of Epistemological
Beliefs 10
Students changed
in complex ways that
varied among different areas
of knowledge and practice.
They concluded that
development of professional
identity should be considered in conjunction with EB. This may
also pertain to psychology students who are
in professional streams of study. In
summary, studies within
and across disciplines
suggest that students
are likely to
have more sophisticated
EB regarding psychology
than many other disciplines. Why might
psychology foster sophisticated
EB? Psychology focuses
on critical thinking, through
emphasis on research methods
and integrating knowledge from
multiple theoretical
perspectives (Reddy, Hammond, Lewandowska, Trapp,
& Marques, 2011).
Psychology
students are encouraged
to develop scepticism
to understand and
justify sources of
evidence and know
how to distinguish
between different strength
evidence. Psychology also
emphasises writing more
than some other
disciplines, which requires
students to compare
and integrate competing knowledge. This may encourage constructivist
approaches.
If
sophisticated EB are
fostered by studying
psychology, how might
this
Significance of
Epistemological Beliefs
Shinn, 2003). Entwistle and Peterson (2004)
noted that students who viewed learning as
being about transforming or constructing knowledge focused on understanding and
displayed intrinsic
academic orientation and
a self-regulated approach
to learning. Students
who viewed learning
as being about
memorising fact-based fragments
of knowledge were more likely to
use surface-level rehearsal and memorising strategies.
Significance of
Epistemological Beliefs
Schommer- Aikins and Easter (2006) found that
business students who believed in quick learning had
worse reading comprehension and poorer
course grades, whereas other
EB did
not correlate with academic outcomes. However,
Hofer and Pintrich (1997) criticised
“quick learning” on methodological and
conceptual grounds as beliefs about learning
rather than beliefs about knowledge.
Trautwein and Lüdtke (2007) found that higher
certainty of knowledge beliefs in final
year high school students were associated with lower grades, after controlling for cognitive ability and socioeconomic
status. Similarly, Phan (2008) found that both EB
and learning approaches
predicted academic performance
of university mathematics
students, and that
learning approaches mediated
effects of EB on academic
performance. University physics
students who showed
higher gains in conceptual
knowledge during first
year described their learning
in ways
that implied more sophisticated
EB (May & Etkina, 2002).
Conclusion
Beliefs about the nature of knowledge, termed
“epistemological beliefs”, are relevant to
understanding educational strategies of both learners and teachers. Epistemological beliefs arguably have particular relevance in
the discipline and profession of psychology,
due to an emphasis on integration of knowledge from multiple theoretical perspectives.
References
Harasim, L. (2012) Learning Theory and
Online Technologies New York/London: Routledge
Hofer, B. and Pintrich, P. (1997) ‘The development of
epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their
relation to learning’ Review of Educational Research Vol.
67, No. 1, pp. 88-140
Schunk, D. (2011) Learning Theories: An
Educational Perspective Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon
Comments
Post a Comment