Innocent misrepresentation
Innocent misrepresentation is a
misrepresentation made by someone who had reasonable grounds for believing that
his false statement was true. Or isthe belief on reasonable grounds up till the
time of the contract that the facts represented are true, as per section.2(1)of the law of contract Act,
cap 345, [R.E 2002]
There
are five basic elements that must be satisfied to prove innocent
misrepresentation;-
a)Someone must makes a false representation
b)The misrepresentation is material to the transaction
c)The other party must substantially rely on the
misrepresentation,
d)The lie must also proximately
cause the other party to suffer damage
e)The loss of the one party must benefit the other.
Remedy: The misled party may
rescind but has no entitlement to damages. However, the court may declare the
contract subsistingand award damages in lieu of rescission. By contrast, the
victim of a breach of warranty in contract may claim damages for loss, but may
not repudiate.
Fraudulent misrepresentationis
any type of lie or false statement that is used to trick a person into an
agreement. The misrepresentation can occur through many ways, including written
words, spoken words, gestures or body motions (such as a nod), or through
silence or inaction.Fraudulent misrepresentation is frequently raised in
connection with contract law. Whenever
parties enter into a legal agreement or contract with one another, all parties
must agree to the contract terms. However, if there is any instance of
fraudulent misrepresentation, it can affect the contract in many ways, such as
making it invalid.
An example of this is
where one party purposefully makes a statement that is false to the other
party, for the purpose of getting them to sign a contract. For instance, if an
auto dealers lies about the accident history of a used vehicle, and you sign a
contract because you thought the car was never in an accident (but it was),
then it might be considered fraudulent misrepresentation.
It’s important to
keep in mind that almost every legal issue, including issues with fraudulent
misrepresentation, depends on the facts and circumstances surrounding the
case.
Fraudulent misrepresentation is also defined
in the third party test in Donohue v Donohue,
where the defendant Donohue was categorically declared completely fraudulent as
he:
(i) knows the
statement to be false, or
(ii) does not believe
in the statement,or
(iii) is reckless as
to its truth.
The elements of fraudulent
misrepresentation includes;-
1.
A representation was in fact made;
2.
That particular representation was false;
3.
The defendant had knowledge that the representation was
false;
4.
The statement was made with the intention that the other party
rely on it and enter into a contract or agreement;
5.
The plaintiff did in fact rely on the misrepresentation and
would not have otherwise entered into the contract or agreement without it; and
6.
The plaintiff suffered measurable harm as a result of the
fraudulent information or statement.
Remedy: The misled party may
rescind and claim damages for all directly consequential losses. Doyle v Olby 1969. Entitlement
to damages, or rescission of the contract.
The differences between fraudulent and innocent
misrepresentation
Contestability
Period,
when an application is approved and the policy is issued, the
policyholder is then subject to a contestability period, typically lasting two
years. During the contestability period, the insurance company is allowed to
deny a claim if there was a misrepresentation regarding any of the information
provided on the application for insurance. This is the case even if the
misrepresentation was due to an oversight or error. After two years have
elapsed from the issuance of the policy, the misrepresentation must be fraudulent.
This means that the erroneous information was provided either deliberately or
recklessly. At this point, the burden of proof is on the insurance company to
provide evidence of fraud.
Denial
of Benefits, Whether the
misrepresentation in question is innocent or fraudulent, it can result not only
in a denial of benefits, but also render a contract void.Every day, countless
disability, critical illness and life insurance claims are denied and
policies terminated on the basis of misrepresentation. Not all of these denials
are legitimate, as often, the questions on insurance applications can be
deliberately confusing and ambiguous. Or information in the policyholder’s
medical records are incorrectly interpreted by the insurance company.
It is critical to consult with an
experienced insurance lawyer before accepting the insurance company’s denial of
benefits.
REFERENCE
THE LAW OF CONTRACT
ACT ,CHAPTER 345 , R.E 2002
ONLINE MATERIALS.
Comments
Post a Comment