With the use of relevant example critically examine the contribution of community participation in improving educational sector in developing country like Tanzan
Communities can be defined by characteristics that the members share, such as culture, language, tradition, law, geography, class, and race. As Schaeffer (2014) argues, some communities are homogeneous while others are heterogeneous; and some united while others conflictive. Some communities are governed and managed by leaders chosen democratically who act relatively autonomously from other levels of government, and some are governed by leaders imposed from above and represent central authorities. Nevertheless, for the purpose of our study community is defining as the group of people who share the same characteristic and live in the same location.
The concept of
participation tends to confuse many scholars of development studies. In
defining participation, Oakley (2017)
define participation as collaboration, in which people, voluntarily, or because
of some persuasion or incentives, agree to collaborate with an externally
determined development project, often by contributing their labour and
resources in return for some expected benefits. World Bank (2015) defines
participation as a process through which stakeholders influence and shares
control over development initiatives and decisions and resources which affect
them
The contribution of engaging communities in addressing
barriers to education has come to the forefront as governments worldwide strive
to reach their commitments to Education for All goals by 2015. Governments are
increasingly recognizing the value of working with communities and sharing
responsibility for, and ownership of, educational systems.
Community Participation in Education
Craig (2013) recognizes parent and community support as one of the key factors
to determine school effectiveness in Sub-Saharan Africa. They identify five
categories of parent and community support that are relevant to the region: (i)
children come to school prepared to learn; (ii) the community provides
financial and material support to the school; (iii) communication between the
school, parents, and community is frequent; (iv) community has a meaningful
role in school governance; and (v) community members and parents assist with
instruction.
However, a lack of resources and management
incapability has proven that governments cannot provide the community with
adequate resources for education delivery, fully-equipped school buildings, and
a full range of grades, teachers and instructional materials. This triggers the
emergence of the collaborative model, in which community plays a supportive
role in government provision of education.
Epstein (2005) summarizes various types of
involvement to explain how schools, families, and communities can work productively
together: Parenting to help all families to establish home environments that
support children’s learning at school; Communicating to design effective forms
of school-to-home-to-school communication that enables parents to learn about
school programmes and their children’s progress in schools as well as teachers
to learn about how children do at home;
Volunteering to recruit and organize parents’ help and
support; Learning at home to provide
information and ideas to families about how to help students at home with
home-work and other curriculum-related activities, decision, and planning;
Decision-making to include families in school decisions, to have parent leaders
and representatives in school meetings; and 15 Collaborating with the community
to identify and integrate resources as well as services from the community in
order to strengthen school programmes, family practices, and student learning.
Bray (2008) provides the following degrees of
participation in education; designing policy, curriculum development, teachers
hiring or firing, supervision, payment of teachers, teacher training, textbook
distribution, certification, building and maintenance of classrooms and
mobilizing resources.
Rose (2003) argues that there is potentially a range
of areas in which communities can be involved in education from mobilizations
of resources and constructing classrooms, to supporting the development of
curriculum and design of policy. Drawing from the above one can conclude that
community participation in education varies widely in different areas. However,
community participation in education in this study referred to construction of
classrooms, teacher’s houses, school toilets and teachers’ offices.
Furthermore,
participation is used to refer to attendance of meetings, contribution of cash,
contribution of labour and involvement in decision-making in the sense
elaborated by Shaeffer (2014). More specifically, participation in this study
is focused on the construction of classrooms, teachers’ houses and school
toilets. Importance of community participation in general It is now widely
accepted that community participation contributes a lot to the development of
projects. Specifically, community participation in education can improve the
educational delivery in secondary schools. Extensive literature search has
identified the importance of community participation in education. Lancaster
(2002) points out the importance of community participation as follows: the
approach helps the project to be sustainable as communities themselves learn
how to adopt and correct changes resulting from the project; partnership or
participation helps to protect interest of the people concerned; it enhances dignity
and self-reliance among people, that is,
they are enabled to obtain and do things by themselves; communities become
aware of the project implementation as they have a great store of wisdom and
skills. They understand their local needs and the nature of their environment
better than outsiders; participation makes local people to act as multiplier of
new project which they achieve.
They can easily transmit the new knowledge they
acquired to other communities, thus cause a rapid increase in growth of the new
idea; participation promotes a sense of ownership among the community of
equipment used in the project, and even projects itself. For example, they
protect and maintain the project through their own means e.g. school buildings;
REFFERENCE
Statistic in Tanzania
(BEST) (2016-2017). Ministry of Education and Vocation Trainings. Tz
Chandan, J. S. (2013).
Management Theory and Practice.Vikas Ltd., New Delhi. 507pp.
Carry J,and Lee L,(2015)
Community Development as a process, University of Missouri
Press, CA
Colleta, N. (2014).Participation
in Education. Environment Department Paper Series
No.001. Washington, DC,
The World Bank. 12pp.
Cresswell, J.W. (2008). Research design; Qualitative and
Quantitative Approaches.Sage
Publications: London. Chinapah,
Comments
Post a Comment