INTRODUCTION
A state
control economy is a system where the government, rather than the free market,
determines what goods should be produced, how much should be produced, and the
price at which the goods are offered for sale.A command economy is when government
central planners own or control the means of production, and determine the distribution
of output.It also determines investments and incomes.The political and economic
landscape of Tanzania changed dramatically in 1967. This was a result of a
political decision that gave birth to Arusha Declaration that was proclaimed
in this year. This was a blue print thatdeclared that Tanzania would be
following Ujamaa (This is a kind of African socialism) policy. The policy
impliedthat the country would be following socialist oriented economic and
political policies. The capitalist, private sector market-led economy that was
inherited from the colonialpower at independence was replaced by state owned,centrally
planned and controlled economy. All the major means of production in the
country (industries, plantaions, commerce, mines etc) were nationalized and
put into government hands.Kaiser (1996)& Ngowi (2002).
Economic
development is the growth of the standard of living of a nations people from a
low-income (poor) economy to a high-income (rich) economy.When the local
quality of life is improved, there is more economic development.When social
scientists study economic development, they look at a lot of things. They want
to know about the way economic development is discussed by historians. They
also want to know how development is happening today. They may want to know why
people invest more money in some places than in others. They also want to know
why people are better at making things to sell in some countries rather than
others.Ngowi HP (2002).
THE
FOLLOWING ARE THE IMPACTS OF STATE CONTROLLED ECONOMY
State influenced development of agriculture,The process of structural transformation, whereby low‐income societies with a heavy focus on agriculture transition to become high‐income societies with a smaller but more productive agricultural sector, is widely found to occur alongside (or follow from) agricultural transformation. Such transformation is generally characterized by agricultural intensification (the adoption of improved seed and other modern inputs), greater participation in agricultural factor markets, a shift toward higher‐income crops and animal products, a greater commercial orientation of farms, and increased integration of farm and off‐farm stages of the agri‐food system. Labour productivity rises both within and beyond agriculture as labour shifts away from farming toward higher‐return sectors. Randa J (1999.
State established some industries in the country,Examples KARIBU TEXTILES MILLS LTD DAR ES SALAAM,KILIMANJARO TEXTILES MILLS LTD ARUSHA,MASUMIN TEXTILES Songea, RUVUMA,MBEYA TEXTILES MILLS MBEYA MORCO TEXTILES LIMITED DAR ES SALAAM And processing industries in Tanga,mtwara,morogoro,dar es salaam which introduced to ensure that agriculture has been improved.Examples Since the independence of Tanzania in 1961, it has invested heavily in textile industry, so that it could satisfy the demand of the market in terms of clothes and cotton growing in Tanzania. In the 1960s and 1970s, Tanzania was able to meet the demand of the market in terms of clothes. The industries produce adequate clothes and materials for making clothes. Furthermore, the industries were of the major employers and contributor to GDP. Zuku A (2002),Ngowi HP (2002).
Led
to the creation of epployment opportunities in diffrent public sectors.Exanples
from 1967 to 1980s industries employed about 25% of the working force and
contributed 25% of GDP in manufacturing sector . After independence, Tanzania
adopted a centralised planning system in mid 1960s which survived for about 30.
The centralised planning system, among other things, was concerned about the
wellbeing of workers including restricting the employer’s right tohire and fire
employees. Taking the example of remuneration, the independence Government
provided adequate salaries which could sustain not only the.
State controlled economy led to the scacity
of product and services (high demand but low production and consuption.state
was unable to saticify needs of the community since the fact that They were
typically characterized by inadequate managerial and technical skills;
embezzlement;capacity under-utilization; reliance on government subsidies;
non-payment of taxes; over-employing; protected from imports; and monopolistic
in nature. As a result they became loss-making entities that depended on
government subsidies for their survival. As public enterprises,they did not
pay tax to their owner either. It is not surprising therefore that most of
these came to a virtual verge of collapse. They became heavily indebted andemployees
were now and then sent into long unpaid leaves.Ngowi (2007)
Nationalization of all major means of production within the country.All the
major means of production in the country (industries, plantaions, commerce,
mines etc) were nationalized and put into government hands. The state became
the major owner, controller and manager of the state owned enterprises .These
are parastatals that were formed following nationalization of private property.
State
contolled economy did not give any incentive or opportunity to theprivate
sector enterprises. Private sector entrepreneurs were looked upon as exploiters
and “enemies of thestate”. Given the acknowledged roles of the private as opposed
to public sector in economic development process, this epoch can be said to
have been a lost period inTanzania’s economic development process. The superiority
of the private sector over the public sector in theeconomic development process
lies mainly on the former’s greater efficiency, effectiveness, vibrancy, dynamism,
innovativeness, flexibility and profit orientation.See details in, among
others, Ngowi (2006)
Qualitative and quantitative low because the main tool of production was the hand hoe. Poor transport system. Post colonial state inherited a poor transport system, most of the roads and railways are still concentrated in production areas, with this type of transport system, and it was very difficult to attainreal development. Lonsdale J (1968).
State Controlled prices, exchange rate, interest rate, importsand
exports added to the already hostile business and investment climate, according
to Levin (2001),during the period of Arusha Declaration per capita incomes grew
by 0.7% per year. This was led by the public administration sector with a
sizeable contributionfrom agriculture and manufacturing. Exports stagnated due
to the policy environment that was hostile for exports.Government had monopoly
on marketing of goods and services. Inefficiencies drove down producer prices
and there was high effective protection of the import-substituting industrial
sector. Ngowi HP (2005)
REFFERENCES
Lonsdale J (1968). The Tanzania Experiment. African Affairs. 67(269): Oxford University Press.
Muganda(1988) Tanzania’s Economic Reforms and Lessons Learned. Paper Presented at the Scaling Up Poverty Reduction:
Ngowi HP (2007). Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs): Theories Practices and Lessons in Tanzania. Unpublished book manuscript.
Ngowi HP (2005). Institutional Reforms to Attract Foreign Dir Investments (FDIs) as a Strategy For Economic Growth: What HasTanzania Done?” In Globalization, Technology, and Sustainable
Ngowi HP (2002). The Role of Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) IHost Economies: A Focus on Tanzania. Unpublished, All But Dissertation Thesis. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
Randa J (1999). Economic Reform and the Stability of the Demand forMoney in Tanzania. J. Afr. Econ, (2nd Ed). Oxford University Press
Comments
Post a Comment